World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller

M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
50
Citations
12855
World Ranking
5367
National Ranking
361

M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 176 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller is a researcher affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada. Their academic work spans areas within neuroscience and health professions, with a focus on subfields such as cognitive neuroscience, speech and hearing, sensory systems, psychiatry and mental health, and general health professions.

Their research addresses a range of topics, including:

  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Noise Effects and Management
  • Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Hearing Impairment and Communication
  • Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Vestibular and Auditory Disorders

Pichora-Fuller's publications appear frequently in journals such as:

  • Ear and Hearing
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Innovation in Aging
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Age and Ageing

Among recent papers in which Pichora-Fuller contributed are:

  • "Toronto emotional speech set (TESS)", 2020, Borealis

Other notable recent papers by colleagues in closely related areas include:

  • "Ageism and COVID-19: what does our society's response say about us?", 2020, Age and Ageing
  • "The Prevalence of Hearing, Vision, and Dual Sensory Loss in Older Canadians: An Analysis of Data from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging", 2020, Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement
  • "Special Issues on Using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment for Telemedicine Assessment During COVID-19", 2020, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
  • "Sex-Linked Biology and Gender-Related Research Is Essential to Advancing Hearing Health", 2022, Ear and Hearing

Their frequent collaborators include researchers such as Walter Wittich, Natalie A. Phillips, Paul Mick, Jennifer L. Campos, and J. B. Orange.

Best Publications

  • How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise

    M. Kathleen Pichora‐Fuller;Bruce A. Schneider;Meredyth Daneman

  • Hearing impairment and cognitive energy: the Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL)

    M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller;Sophia E. Kramer;Mark A. Eckert;Brent Edwards

  • The Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) model: Theoretical, empirical, and clinical advances

    Jerker Rönnberg;Thomas Lunner;Adriana Zekveld;Adriana Zekveld;Patrik Sörqvist

  • Implications of perceptual deterioration for cognitive aging research.

    Bruce A. Schneider;M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller

  • Effects of Age on Auditory and Cognitive Processing: Implications for Hearing Aid Fitting and Audiologic Rehabilitation

    M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller;Gurjit Singh

  • Effects of aging on auditory processing of speech.

    M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller;Pamela E. Souza

  • Cognitive aging and auditory information processing.

    M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller

  • Listening in aging adults: from discourse comprehension to psychoacoustics.

    Bruce A. Schneider;Meredyth Daneman;M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller

  • Gap detection and the precedence effect in young and old adults.

    Bruce A. Schneider;Margaret Kathleen Pichora‐Fuller;Danielle Kowalchuk;Morag Lamb

  • The emergence of cognitive hearing science.

    Stig Arlinger;Thomas Lunner;Björn Lyxell;M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller

  • Effects of hearing and vision impairments on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment

    Kate Dupuis;M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller;Alison L Chasteen;Veronica Marchuk

  • Use of supportive context by younger and older adult listeners: balancing bottom-up and top-down information processing.

    M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller

  • Normative Voice Data for Younger and Older Adults

    Huiwen Goy;David N. Fernandes;M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller;M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller;Pascal van Lieshout

  • Processing speed and timing in aging adults: psychoacoustics, speech perception, and comprehension.

    M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller

  • Temporal jitter disrupts speech intelligibility: a simulation of auditory aging.

    M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller;Bruce A. Schneider;Ewen MacDonald;Hollis E. Pass

  • Age-Related Changes in Temporal Processing: Implications for Speech Perception

    Bruce A. Schneider;M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller

  • Toronto emotional speech set (TESS)

    M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller;Kate Dupuis

  • Combined impairments in vision, hearing and cognition are associated with greater levels of functional and communication difficulties than cognitive impairment alone: Analysis of interRAI data for home care and long-term care recipients in Ontario.

    Dawn M. Guthrie;Jacob G. S. Davidson;Nicole Williams;Jennifer Campos;Jennifer Campos

  • Priming and sentence context support listening to noise-vocoded speech by younger and older adults

    Signy Sheldon;M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller;Bruce A. Schneider

  • Effects of Aging and Noise on Real-Time Spoken Word Recognition: Evidence From Eye Movements

    Boaz M. Ben-David;Craig G. Chambers;Meredyth Daneman;M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller

Frequent Co-Authors

Bruce A. Schneider
Bruce A. Schneider University of Toronto
Natalie A. Phillips
Natalie A. Phillips Concordia University
Frank A. Russo
Frank A. Russo Toronto Metropolitan University
Björn Lyxell
Björn Lyxell Linköping University
Mary Rudner
Mary Rudner Linköping University
Meredyth Daneman
Meredyth Daneman University of Toronto
Alison L. Chasteen
Alison L. Chasteen University of Toronto
Adriana A. Zekveld
Adriana A. Zekveld Amsterdam UMC
Patrik Sörqvist
Patrik Sörqvist University of Gaevle
Elizabeth Rochon
Elizabeth Rochon University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology unlocks a wide range of online degree options and career pathways, especially in the fields of behavioral health and applied behavior analysis (ABA). Many aspiring professionals are interested in becoming Board Certified Behavior Analysts (BCBAs), a popular specialization that often requires both advanced education and supervised practical experience.

Educational requirements for BCBA certification usually include a graduate-level degree and specific coursework. However, requirements can differ by region. For instance, El Paso bcba requirements highlight the importance of accredited programs and supervised fieldwork. If you're interested in learning how to become a bcba in Fort Wayne, you'll find similar core steps, but local internships and hands-on experience also play a big role.

Those researching bcba certification requirements in Fort Worth will note additional state-specific details that can impact the journey toward certification. Likewise, understanding Fremont bcba education requirements can help guide your choice of university and practical placements.

Exploring online degrees in psychology and ABA can provide flexibility while meeting these regional and national certification standards, preparing graduates for rewarding roles in mental health, education, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles