World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Patricia A. Cleary publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patricia A. Cleary sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Patricia A. Cleary D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patricia A. Cleary sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Patricia A. Cleary is a researcher affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a significant emphasis on endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism. The scope of their work also includes ophthalmology, surgery, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, and genetics.

The scientist's key research topics include diabetes management and research, pancreatic function and diabetes, cardiovascular function and risk factors, diabetes and associated disorders, diabetes treatment and management, ocular diseases and Behçet's syndrome, as well as retinal and optic conditions.

Patricia A. Cleary has contributed to several publications across various well-known scientific venues. These include:

  • Diabetes
  • Diabetic Medicine
  • Ophthalmology
  • Value in Health

Their recent papers encompass the following works:

  • Brain Function Differences in Children With Type 1 Diabetes: A Functional MRI Study of Working Memory (2020) published in Diabetes
  • The Course of Visual Recovery after Optic Neuritis (2020) published in Ophthalmology
  • Weight gain trajectories and obesity rates in intensive and conventional treatments of type 1 diabetes from the DCCT compared with a control population without diabetes (2022) published in Diabetic Medicine
  • EE199 A Systematic Literature Review of Economic Evaluations of Community-Based Interventions to Improve Mobility, Continence, and Psychological Wellbeing in Individuals with Neuro-Physical Disabilities (2023) published in Value in Health

Their frequent co-authors include Lara C. Foland-Ross, Gabby Tong, Nelly Mauras, Allison Cato, and Tandy Aye. These collaborations indicate ongoing engagements in multidisciplinary research teams.

Best Publications

  • The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

    Diabetes Control;D M Nathan;S Genuth

  • Intensive diabetes treatment and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 1 diabetes.

    David M. Nathan;Patricia A. Cleary;Jye Yu C Backlund;Saul M. Genuth

  • Retinopathy and nephropathy in patients with type 1 diabetes four years after a trial of intensive therapy.

    Diabetes Control;Complications Trial

  • A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Corticosteroids in the Treatment of Acute Optic Neuritis

    Roy W. Beck;Patricia A. Cleary;Malcolm M. Anderson;John L. Keltner

  • Intensive diabetes therapy and carotid intima-media thickness in type 1 diabetes mellitus.

    David M Nathan;John Lachin;Patricia Cleary;Trevor Orchard

  • The Effect of Corticosteroids for Acute Optic Neuritis on the Subsequent Development of Multiple Sclerosis

    Beck Rw;Cleary Pa;Trobe Jd;Kaufman Di

  • Long-term effect of diabetes and its treatment on cognitive function.

    Diabetes Control;Complications Trial

  • Intensive diabetes therapy and glomerular filtration rate in type 1 diabetes

    Ian H. De Boer;Wanjie Sun;Patricia A. Cleary;John M. Lachin

  • Skin collagen glycation, glycoxidation, and crosslinking are lower in subjects with long-term intensive versus conventional therapy of type 1 diabetes: relevance of glycated collagen products versus HbA1c as markers of diabetic complications. DCCT Skin Collagen Ancillary Study Group. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial.

    Vincent M. Monnier;Oliver Bautista;David Kenny;David R. Sell

  • Modern-Day Clinical Course of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus After 30 Years’ Duration: The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications and Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications Experience (1983-2005)

    Diabetes Control;Complications Trial;Complications (Dcct)

  • Effect of excessive weight gain with intensive therapy of type 1 Diabetes on lipid levels and blood pressure : Results from the DCCT

    Jonathan Q. Purnell;John E. Hokanson;Santica M. Marcovina;Michael W. Steffes

  • Neuropathy Among the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Cohort 8 Years After Trial Completion

    Catherine L. Martin;James Albers;William H. Herman;Patricia Cleary

  • Association between 7 years of intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes and long-term mortality.

    Trevor J. Orchard;David M. Nathan;Bernard Zinman;Patricia Cleary

  • Use of the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument as a measure of distal symmetrical peripheral neuropathy in Type 1 diabetes: results from the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications.

    W. H. Herman;R. Pop-Busui;B. H. Braffett;C. L. Martin

  • Effect of prior intensive insulin treatment during the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) on peripheral neuropathy in type 1 diabetes during the Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) study

    James W. Albers;William H. Herman;Rodica Pop-Busui;Eva L. Feldman

  • Long-term Renal Outcomes of Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus and Microalbuminuria: An Analysis of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Cohort

    Ian H. de Boer;Tessa C. Rue;Patricia A. Cleary;John M. Lachin

  • Prolonged effect of intensive therapy on the risk of retinopathy complications in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus: 10 years after the diabetes control and complications trial

    Neil H. White;Wanjie Sun;Patricia A. Cleary;Ronald P. Danis

  • Effects of Prior Intensive Insulin Therapy on Cardiac Autonomic Nervous System Function in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Study (DCCT/EDIC)

    Rodica Pop-Busui;Phillip A. Low;Barbara H. Waberski;Catherine L. Martin

  • Development and Progression of Renal Insufficiency With and Without Albuminuria in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial and the Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Study

    Mark E Molitch;Michael W. Steffes;Wanjie Sun;Brandy Rutledge

  • Effect of intensive diabetes therapy on the progression of diabetic retinopathy in patients with type 1 diabetes: 18 years of follow-up in the DCCT/EDIC.

    Diabetes Control;Complications Trial

Frequent Co-Authors

John M. Lachin
John M. Lachin George Washington University
David M. Nathan
David M. Nathan Harvard University
Maria F. Lopes-Virella
Maria F. Lopes-Virella Medical University of South Carolina
Trevor J. Orchard
Trevor J. Orchard University of Pittsburgh
Andrew D. Paterson
Andrew D. Paterson University of Toronto
Michael W. Steffes
Michael W. Steffes University of Minnesota
Gabriel Virella
Gabriel Virella Medical University of South Carolina
Ronald Klein
Ronald Klein University of Wisconsin–Madison
William H. Herman
William H. Herman University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Rodney L. Dunn
Rodney L. Dunn University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in the healthcare field but not sure if a traditional MD program is the right path for you? There are a variety of online RHIT degree programs that can prepare you for crucial behind-the-scenes roles in health information management. These programs focus on the organization and secure management of medical data—skills in high demand at hospitals, clinics, and insurance companies.

If you are detail-oriented and enjoy working with health records, consider pursuing medical coding certification. Certified professionals in this area help ensure patient data accuracy and facilitate smooth insurance billing processes.

Nursing remains one of the most respected and versatile career options in medicine. Students looking to advance their careers can find the cheapest online NP programs to become nurse practitioners—a high-demand, patient-facing role. Alternatively, prospective nurses can research what is the cheapest online college for nursing? to find flexible, affordable paths to a rewarding career in nursing.

Exploring these online programs offers flexibility, lower costs, and opens doors to a wide range of healthcare careers beyond the traditional medical school pathway.

Best Scientists Citing Patricia A. Cleary

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles