World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 118 3953 3700 2164 2002 431 105020

George L. King publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by George L. King between 1980 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. George L. King published across 46 years, from 1980 to 2025, averaging 9.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2018. 17 of the 437 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2018. 1980: 2 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 6 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 6 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 9 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 10 publications 1996: 18 publications 1997: 13 publications 1998: 16 publications 1999: 13 publications 2000: 13 publications 2001: 14 publications 2002: 16 publications 2003: 14 publications 2004: 15 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 9 publications
1980 2025

437 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
George L. King: publications per year, 1980 to 2025
Year Publications
1980 2
1981 3
1982 6
1983 3
1984 2
1985 6
1986 4
1987 5
1988 3
1989 9
1990 2
1991 4
1992 7
1993 5
1994 8
1995 10
1996 18
1997 13
1998 16
1999 13
2000 13
2001 14
2002 16
2003 14
2004 15
2005 10
2006 10
2007 13
2008 13
2009 6
2010 13
2011 13
2012 12
2013 8
2014 6
2015 9
2016 10
2017 9
2018 19
2019 16
2020 13
2021 14
2022 7
2023 8
2024 8
2025 9
Total 437
Download as CSV

George L. King publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George L. King sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 421–440 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 431 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806 431
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

George L. King D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George L. King sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 118–119 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 118 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302 118
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

George L. King is primarily affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields with a strong focus on Medicine, having published 82 papers in this area. Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology is another significant field of study, with 38 publications. The scientist's subfields of expertise include Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Molecular Biology, Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

The core topics of their research cover:

  • Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Retinal Imaging and Analysis
  • Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
  • Advanced Glycation End Products research
  • Diabetes Management and Research
  • Diabetes Treatment and Management

Frequent publication venues for George L. King include Diabetes, with 20 publications, followed by Diabetes Care and The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, each with 3 papers. JCI Insight features 2 publications, and there is also presence in Endocrine Reviews.

Recent notable papers include:

  • Protective Factors and the Pathogenesis of Complications in Diabetes, 2023, Endocrine Reviews
  • Insulin's actions on vascular tissues: Physiological effects and pathophysiological contributions to vascular complications of diabetes, 2021, Molecular Metabolism
  • Selective modulation by PARP-1 of HIF-1α-recruitment to chromatin during hypoxia is required for tumor adaptation to hypoxic conditions, 2021, Redox Biology
  • Presence and Determinants of Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality in Individuals With Type 1 Diabetes of Long Duration: The FinnDiane 50 Years of Diabetes Study, 2021, Diabetes Care
  • Endothelial Cells Induced Progenitors Into Brown Fat to Reduce Atherosclerosis, 2022, Circulation Research

Among frequent coauthors, George L. King has collaborated extensively with Kyoungmin Park (30 joint publications), Marc Gregory Yu (25), I-Hsien Wu (23), Hetal Shah (16), and Jialin Fu (15).

The scientist was recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2018.

Best Publications

  • Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33)

    R C Turner;R R Holman;C A Cull;I M Stratton

  • Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group.

    Stearne;SL Palmer;Hammersley;SL Franklin

  • Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38

    M R Stearne;S L Palmer;M S Hammersley;S L Franklin

  • Efficacy of atenolol and captopril in reducing risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 39

    M R Stearne;S L Palmer;M S Hammersley;S L Franklin

  • Protein kinase C activation and the development of diabetic complications.

    Daisuke Koya;George L. King

  • Suppression of retinal neovascularization in vivo by inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) using soluble VEGF-receptor chimeric proteins

    Lloyd Paul Aiello;Eric A. Pierce;Eliot D. Foley;Hitoshi Takagi

  • Amelioration of Vascular Dysfunctions in Diabetic Rats by an Oral PKC β Inhibitor

    Hidehiro Ishii;Michael R. Jirousek;Daisuke Koya;Chikako Takagi

  • Retinopathy in Diabetes

    Donald S. Fong;Lloyd Aiello;Thomas W. Gardner;George L. King

  • Molecular Understanding of Hyperglycemia's Adverse Effects for Diabetic Complications

    Matthew J. Sheetz;George L. King

  • Activation of Protein Kinase C Isoforms and Its Impact on Diabetic Complications

    Pedro Geraldes;George L. King

  • Preferential elevation of protein kinase C isoform beta II and diacylglycerol levels in the aorta and heart of diabetic rats: differential reversibility to glycemic control by islet cell transplantation

    T Inoguchi;R Battan;E Handler;J R Sportsman

  • Vascular endothelial growth factor-induced retinal permeability is mediated by protein kinase C in vivo and suppressed by an orally effective beta-isoform-selective inhibitor.

    Lloyd Paul Aiello;Sven Erik Bursell;Allen Clermont;Elia Duh

  • Microvascular and macrovascular reactivity is reduced in subjects at risk for type 2 diabetes.

    A E Caballero;S Arora;R Saouaf;S C Lim

  • Regulation of Endothelial Constitutive Nitric Oxide Synthase Gene Expression in Endothelial Cells and In Vivo A Specific Vascular Action of Insulin

    Koji Kuboki;Zhen Y. Jiang;Noriko Takahara;Sung Woo Ha

  • Vascular Complications of Diabetes: Mechanisms of Injury and Protective Factors

    Christian Rask-Madsen;George L. King

  • Characterization of protein kinase C beta isoform activation on the gene expression of transforming growth factor-beta, extracellular matrix components, and prostanoids in the glomeruli of diabetic rats.

    D Koya;M R Jirousek;Y W Lin;H Ishii

  • Characterization of selective resistance to insulin signaling in the vasculature of obese Zucker (fa/fa) rats

    Zhen Y. Jiang;You-Wei Lin;Allen Clemont;Edward P. Feener

  • Characterization of vascular endothelial growth factor's effect on the activation of protein kinase C, its isoforms, and endothelial cell growth.

    P Xia;Lloyd Paul Aiello;H Ishii;Zhaoxin Jiang

  • Increased Protein Kinase C Activity and Expression of Ca2+-Sensitive Isoforms in the Failing Human Heart

    Nancy Bowling;Richard A. Walsh;Guojie Song;Thomas Estridge

  • Receptor-mediated transport of insulin across endothelial cells.

    George L. King;Sandra M. Johnson

Frequent Co-Authors

Lloyd Paul Aiello
Lloyd Paul Aiello Harvard University
Daisuke Koya
Daisuke Koya Kanazawa Medical University
C. Ronald Kahn
C. Ronald Kahn Harvard University
Susan Bonner-Weir
Susan Bonner-Weir Harvard University
Morris F. White
Morris F. White Boston Children's Hospital
Timothy S. Kern
Timothy S. Kern University of California, Irvine
Gordon C. Weir
Gordon C. Weir Harvard University
Christopher J. Rhodes
Christopher J. Rhodes University of Chicago
Amy J. Wagers
Amy J. Wagers Harvard University
Chris Wallace
Chris Wallace University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine doesn’t always mean following a traditional path. There are a range of online healthcare degrees that offer flexible entry points and specialized career options, especially in nursing. Exploring affordable nursing programs online can help reduce educational costs while opening doors to high-demand roles in healthcare.

For those looking to advance in clinical leadership or teaching, the cheapest dnp online program offers a pathway to the highest level of nursing practice. Additionally, many working registered nurses opt for the cheapest rn to bsn program to enhance their credentials and earning potential without sacrificing their current job.

Even if you don’t have a nursing background, accelerated options exist. The cheapest direct entry msn programs enable those with a non-nursing bachelor’s degree to make a career change into advanced practice nursing quickly. Whether you’re starting out or advancing your expertise, these options offer diverse ways to build a future in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing George L. King

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles