World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 97 9077 8520 4681 4329 282 56136
Molecular Biology 97 583 521 320 283 262 55015

Amy J. Wagers publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Amy J. Wagers between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Amy J. Wagers published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 10.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 2013. 13 of the 308 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 2013. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 29 publications 2014: 25 publications 2015: 25 publications 2016: 24 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 8 publications
1996 2025

308 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Amy J. Wagers: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 2
1998 2
1999 1
2000 1
2001 2
2002 5
2003 4
2004 11
2005 12
2006 7
2007 6
2008 16
2009 4
2010 12
2011 13
2012 19
2013 29
2014 25
2015 25
2016 24
2017 7
2018 10
2019 14
2020 11
2021 11
2022 14
2023 7
2024 5
2025 8
Total 308
Download as CSV

Amy J. Wagers publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy J. Wagers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 257–266 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 262 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53 262
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Amy J. Wagers D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy J. Wagers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 96–97 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 97 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38 97
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - National Institutes of Health Director's Pioneer Award

Overview

Amy J. Wagers is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States and has contributed to a variety of research areas primarily within biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine.

Their research spans several key subfields, including molecular biology, immunology, physiology, genetics, and aging. The scientist's work covers diverse topics such as muscle physiology and disorders, genetics related to aging and longevity in model organisms, GDF15 and related biomarkers, virus-based gene therapy research, single-cell and spatial transcriptomics, RNA research and splicing, as well as adipose tissue and metabolism.

Wagers has published numerous papers with notable recent publications including:

  • Loss of epigenetic information as a cause of mammalian aging, 2023, Cell
  • Directed evolution of a family of AAV capsid variants enabling potent muscle-directed gene delivery across species, 2021, Cell
  • The neutrotime transcriptional signature defines a single continuum of neutrophils across biological compartments, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Gut CD4+ T cell phenotypes are a continuum molded by microbes, not by TH archetypes, 2021, Nature Immunology
  • FOS licenses early events in stem cell activation driving skeletal muscle regeneration, 2021, Cell Reports

Frequent co-authors include Kathleen A. Messemer, Jason D. Buenrostro, Lee L. Rubin, Richard Lee, and Christophe Benoıst, reflecting collaborations that have appeared repeatedly in their body of work.

Wagers's publications most often appear in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Cell, Nature Immunology, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), and Nature Communications.

The scientist received the National Institutes of Health Director's Pioneer Award in 2018, recognizing contributions within their field.

Best Publications

  • Rejuvenation of aged progenitor cells by exposure to a young systemic environment

    Irina M. Conboy;Michael J. Conboy;Amy J. Wagers;Amy J. Wagers;Eric R. Girma

  • Haematopoietic stem cells adopt mature haematopoietic fates in ischaemic myocardium

    Leora B. Balsam;Amy J. Wagers;Julie L. Christensen;Theo Kofidis

  • The Immunological Genome Project: networks of gene expression in immune cells

    Tracy S P Heng;Michio W Painter;Kutlu Elpek;Veronika Lukacs-Kornek

  • Little evidence for developmental plasticity of adult hematopoietic stem cells.

    Amy J. Wagers;Richard I. Sherwood;Julie L. Christensen;Irving L. Weissman

  • Plasticity of Adult Stem Cells

    Amy J Wagers;Irving L Weissman

  • M2 microglia and macrophages drive oligodendrocyte differentiation during CNS remyelination

    Veronique E. Miron;Amanda Boyd;Jing Wei Zhao;Tracy J. Yuen;Tracy J. Yuen

  • Cell type of origin influences the molecular and functional properties of mouse induced pluripotent stem cells

    Jose M. Polo;Susanna Liu;Maria Eugenia Figueroa;Warakorn Kulalert

  • Physiological migration of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells.

    Douglas E. Wright;Amy J. Wagers;Anjali Pathak Gulati;Frances L. Johnson

  • Biology of hematopoietic stem cells and progenitors: implications for clinical application.

    Motonari Kondo;Amy J. Wagers;Markus G. Manz;Susan S. Prohaska

  • A Special Population of Regulatory T Cells Potentiates Muscle Repair

    Dalia Burzyn;Wilson Kuswanto;Dmitriy Kolodin;Jennifer L. Shadrach;Jennifer L. Shadrach

  • Langerhans cells renew in the skin throughout life under steady-state conditions

    Miriam Merad;Markus G. Manz;Holger Karsunky;Amy Wagers

  • Cell intrinsic alterations underlie hematopoietic stem cell aging

    Derrick J. Rossi;David Bryder;Jacob M. Zahn;Henrik Ahlenius

  • In vivo gene editing in dystrophic mouse muscle and muscle stem cells

    Mohammadsharif Tabebordbar;Kexian Zhu;Jason K. W. Cheng;Wei Leong Chew

  • Vascular and neurogenic rejuvenation of the aging mouse brain by young systemic factors.

    Lida Katsimpardi;Nadia K. Litterman;Pamela A. Schein;Christine M. Miller;Christine M. Miller

  • Growth Differentiation Factor 11 Is a Circulating Factor that Reverses Age-Related Cardiac Hypertrophy

    Francesco Loffredo;Matthew L. Steinhauser;Steven M. Jay;Joseph Gannon

  • No place like home: anatomy and function of the stem cell niche.

    D Leanne Jones;Amy J Wagers

  • Skin infection generates non-migratory memory CD8+ T(RM) cells providing global skin immunity.

    Xiaodong Jiang;Rachael A. Clark;Luzheng Liu;Amy J. Wagers

  • Restoring Systemic GDF11 Levels Reverses Age-Related Dysfunction in Mouse Skeletal Muscle

    M Sinha;Y. C. Jang;Y. C. Jang;Juhyun Oh;Juhyun Oh;Danika Mei Po Khong;Danika Mei Po Khong

  • BIOLOGY OF HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELLS AND PROGENITORS: Implications for

    Motonari Kondo;Amy J. Wagers;Markus G. Manz;Susan S. Prohaska

  • In vivo gene editing in dystrophic mouse muscle and muscle stem cells

    M. Tabebordbar;K. Zhu;J. K. W. Cheng;W. L. Chew

Frequent Co-Authors

Irving L. Weissman
Irving L. Weissman Stanford University
Richard T. Lee
Richard T. Lee Harvard University
Diane Mathis
Diane Mathis Harvard University
Christophe Benoist
Christophe Benoist Harvard University
Derrick J. Rossi
Derrick J. Rossi Harvard University
Aviv Regev
Aviv Regev Genentech
Jill M. Goldstein
Jill M. Goldstein Harvard University
Lee L. Rubin
Lee L. Rubin Harvard University
Miriam Merad
Miriam Merad Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in Molecular Biology have a variety of related online degree options to explore, particularly if they are considering interdisciplinary paths in healthcare or research. Many prospective students compare programs such as capella rn to bsn vs chamberlain rn to bsn when looking for flexible, reputable options to advance their careers.

For those who want to pursue advanced nursing or laboratory roles, several rn to bsn to msn online programs offer a bridge to master's-level study, opening doors to leadership and specialized medical research positions.

When selecting a program, many students prioritize affordability and accreditation. Choosing a non profit online university can provide both value and educational quality, which are important for a strong foundation in molecular sciences or related health fields.

If you are currently serving in the military or a veteran, seeking military friendly online schools can help ensure your chosen program supports your unique needs with flexible schedules and dedicated support resources.

Best Scientists Citing Amy J. Wagers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles