World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
141
Citations
86479
World Ranking
1608
National Ranking
936

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
141
Citations
86517
World Ranking
255
National Ranking
172

David T. Scadden publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David T. Scadden sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 644 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

David T. Scadden D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David T. Scadden sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 141 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 2012 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 2007 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

David T. Scadden is a researcher affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their work spans several areas within biomedical science, with a focus on medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. They have contributed extensively to the fields of molecular biology, hematology, immunology, oncology, and cancer research.

The research topics prominently associated with David T. Scadden include:

  • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
  • Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Immune cells in cancer
  • Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics

Significant recent publications by David T. Scadden showcase varied investigations in both basic and translational biomedical research. Key papers include:

  • C9orf72 suppresses systemic and neural inflammation induced by gut bacteria, 2020, Nature
  • Human prostate cancer bone metastases have an actionable immunosuppressive microenvironment, 2021, Cancer Cell
  • Lipid availability determines fate of skeletal progenitor cells via SOX9, 2020, Nature
  • Dissecting the immune suppressive human prostate tumor microenvironment via integrated single-cell and spatial transcriptomic analyses, 2023, Nature Communications
  • Health Consequences of Thymus Removal in Adults, 2023, New England Journal of Medicine

David T. Scadden maintains frequent collaborations with several co-authors, including:

  • David B. Sykes
  • Peter V. Kharchenko
  • Shenglin Mei
  • Azeem Sharda
  • Youmna Kfoury

The researcher has published many articles in notable scientific venues such as Blood, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Experimental Hematology, Blood Advances, and Cancer Research. Their publication record highlights a continued presence in leading journals related to hematology and cancer research.

Recognition of David T. Scadden's contributions is reflected in several honors. These include being named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in 2016, a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2012, membership in the National Academy of Medicine since 2007, and membership in the Association of American Physicians.

Best Publications

  • Osteoblastic cells regulate the haematopoietic stem cell niche

    Laura M Calvi;Gregor B Adams;K. W. Weibrecht;Jonathan Weber

  • Mesenchymal and haematopoietic stem cells form a unique bone marrow niche

    Simón Méndez-Ferrer;Tatyana V. Michurina;Francesca Ferraro;Amin R. Mazloom

  • Direct evidence that the VEGF-specific antibody bevacizumab has antivascular effects in human rectal cancer

    Christopher G Willett;Yves Boucher;Emmanuelle di Tomaso;Dan G Duda

  • The bone marrow niche for haematopoietic stem cells

    Sean J. Morrison;David T. Scadden

  • The stem-cell niche as an entity of action

    David T. Scadden

  • Tat peptide-derivatized magnetic nanoparticles allow in vivo tracking and recovery of progenitor cells.

    Maïté Lewin;Nadia Carlesso;Ching Hsuan Tung;Xiao Wu Tang

  • AZD2171, a Pan-VEGF Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, Normalizes Tumor Vasculature and Alleviates Edema in Glioblastoma Patients

    Tracy T. Batchelor;A. Gregory Sorensen;A. Gregory Sorensen;Emmanuelle di Tomaso;Wei Ting Zhang;Wei Ting Zhang

  • Hematopoietic stem cell quiescence maintained by p21cip1/waf1.

    Tao Cheng;Neil Rodrigues;Hongmei Shen;Yong-guang Yang

  • Bayesian approach to single-cell differential expression analysis

    Peter Vasili Kharchenko;Lev Silberstein;David Thomas Scadden

  • Stem-cell ageing modified by the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p16INK4a.

    Viktor Janzen;Randolf Forkert;Heather E. Fleming;Yoriko Saito

  • Bone progenitor dysfunction induces myelodysplasia and secondary leukaemia

    Marc H. G. P. Raaijmakers;Siddhartha Mukherjee;Shangqin Guo;Siyi Zhang

  • Direct measurement of local oxygen concentration in the bone marrow of live animals

    Joel A. Spencer;Francesca Ferraro;Emmanuel Roussakis;Alyssa Klein

  • In vivo imaging of specialized bone marrow endothelial microdomains for tumour engraftment

    Dorothy A. Sipkins;Xunbin Wei;Juwell W. Wu;Judith M. Runnels

  • Live-animal tracking of individual haematopoietic stem/progenitor cells in their niche

    Cristina Lo Celso;Heather E. Fleming;Juwell W. Wu;Cher X. Zhao

  • Deconstructing stem cell self-renewal: genetic insights into cell-cycle regulation

    Keith W. Orford;David T. Scadden

  • Stem cell engraftment at the endosteal niche is specified by the calcium-sensing receptor

    Gregor B. Adams;Karissa T. Chabner;Ian R. Alley;Douglas P. Olson

  • A putative murine ecotropic retrovirus receptor gene encodes a multiple membrane-spanning protein and confers susceptibility to virus infection.

    Lorraine M. Albritton;Lena Tseng;David Scadden;James M. Cunningham

  • Differentiating the pathologies of cerebral malaria by postmortem parasite counts.

    Terrie E Taylor;Wenjiang J Fu;Wenjiang J Fu;Richard A Carr;Richard O Whitten

  • Oocyte Generation in Adult Mammalian Ovaries by Putative Germ Cells in Bone Marrow and Peripheral Blood

    Joshua Johnson;Jessamyn Bagley;Malgorzata Skaznik-Wikiel;Ho-Joon Lee

  • Cancers predispose neutrophils to release extracellular DNA traps that contribute to cancer-associated thrombosis

    Mélanie Demers;Daniela S. Krause;Daphne Schatzberg;Kimberly Martinod;Kimberly Martinod

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles P. Lin
Charles P. Lin Harvard University
Jerome E. Groopman
Jerome E. Groopman Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
David Dombkowski
David Dombkowski Harvard University
Benjamin L. Ebert
Benjamin L. Ebert Harvard University
Peter V. Kharchenko
Peter V. Kharchenko Harvard University
Noopur Raje
Noopur Raje Harvard University
Henry M. Kronenberg
Henry M. Kronenberg Harvard University
Teru Hideshima
Teru Hideshima Harvard University
Rakesh K. Jain
Rakesh K. Jain Harvard University
Stuart L. Schreiber
Stuart L. Schreiber Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology or Biochemistry opens doors to a variety of flexible online degrees and emerging healthcare career paths. Many students explore roles beyond lab work, such as medical billing, coding, health information management, and nutrition science—fields offering strong job demand and the ability to work remotely.

For instance, those interested in healthcare data may want to know how much do medical coders make, as this career can provide competitive salaries even for entry-level professionals. It’s also important to understand is medical billing and coding in demand—with the ongoing digital transformation in healthcare, these roles are becoming increasingly essential.

If you’d like to pursue further credentials in healthcare administration, you can find accredited and affordable options, such as a him degree online. Alternatively, if nutrition piques your interest, consider the cheapest online nutrition degree programs, which allow you to specialize and advance your career without breaking the bank.

Whether you aim for clinical, administrative, or specialized science roles, there are a wealth of online degrees and career pathways available to Biology and Biochemistry graduates.

Best Scientists Citing David T. Scadden

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles