World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Animal Science and Veterinary

D-Index
56
Citations
10221
World Ranking
430
National Ranking
152

R.K. Miller publication distribution in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R.K. Miller sits on this spectrum.

29–33 publications: 1 scientists 34–38 publications: 6 scientists 39–43 publications: 17 scientists 44–48 publications: 23 scientists 49–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–58 publications: 44 scientists 59–63 publications: 66 scientists 64–68 publications: 75 scientists 69–73 publications: 71 scientists 74–78 publications: 85 scientists 79–83 publications: 108 scientists 84–88 publications: 105 scientists 89–93 publications: 84 scientists 94–98 publications: 103 scientists 99–103 publications: 97 scientists 104–108 publications: 95 scientists 109–113 publications: 89 scientists 114–118 publications: 88 scientists 119–123 publications: 109 scientists 124–128 publications: 93 scientists 129–133 publications: 89 scientists 134–138 publications: 95 scientists 139–143 publications: 92 scientists 144–148 publications: 80 scientists 149–153 publications: 75 scientists 154–158 publications: 74 scientists 159–163 publications: 67 scientists 164–168 publications: 53 scientists 169–173 publications: 62 scientists 174–178 publications: 63 scientists 179–183 publications: 50 scientists 184–188 publications: 55 scientists 189–193 publications: 50 scientists 194–198 publications: 27 scientists 199–203 publications: 44 scientists 204–208 publications: 31 scientists 209–213 publications: 28 scientists 214–218 publications: 38 scientists 219–223 publications: 33 scientists 224–228 publications: 36 scientists 229–233 publications: 29 scientists 234–238 publications: 35 scientists 239–243 publications: 23 scientists 244–248 publications: 24 scientists 249–253 publications: 29 scientists 254–258 publications: 28 scientists 259–263 publications: 21 scientists 264–268 publications: 25 scientists 269–273 publications: 11 scientists 274–278 publications: 18 scientists 279–283 publications: 13 scientists 284–288 publications: 18 scientists 289–293 publications: 10 scientists 294–298 publications: 12 scientists 299–303 publications: 11 scientists 304–308 publications: 15 scientists 309–313 publications: 14 scientists 314–318 publications: 14 scientists 319–323 publications: 8 scientists 324–328 publications: 8 scientists 329–333 publications: 13 scientists 334–338 publications: 14 scientists 339–343 publications: 13 scientists 344–348 publications: 10 scientists 349–353 publications: 11 scientists 354–358 publications: 5 scientists 359–363 publications: 8 scientists 364–368 publications: 8 scientists 369–373 publications: 6 scientists 374–378 publications: 7 scientists 379–383 publications: 8 scientists 384–388 publications: 3 scientists 389–393 publications: 4 scientists 394–398 publications: 5 scientists 399–403 publications: 8 scientists 404–408 publications: 5 scientists 409–413 publications: 4 scientists 414–418 publications: 3 scientists 419–423 publications: 8 scientists 424–428 publications: 5 scientists 429–433 publications: 3 scientists 434–438 publications: 5 scientists 439–441 publications: 5 scientists 442+ publications: 99 scientists
29 publications 442+

This scientist: 244 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more.

R.K. Miller D-index placement in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R.K. Miller sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 5 scientists 21 D-Index: 22 scientists 22 D-Index: 31 scientists 23 D-Index: 44 scientists 24 D-Index: 53 scientists 25 D-Index: 66 scientists 26 D-Index: 80 scientists 27 D-Index: 101 scientists 28 D-Index: 106 scientists 29 D-Index: 116 scientists 30 D-Index: 154 scientists 31 D-Index: 158 scientists 32 D-Index: 143 scientists 33 D-Index: 137 scientists 34 D-Index: 126 scientists 35 D-Index: 134 scientists 36 D-Index: 112 scientists 37 D-Index: 115 scientists 38 D-Index: 105 scientists 39 D-Index: 111 scientists 40 D-Index: 107 scientists 41 D-Index: 87 scientists 42 D-Index: 74 scientists 43 D-Index: 62 scientists 44 D-Index: 61 scientists 45 D-Index: 41 scientists 46 D-Index: 51 scientists 47 D-Index: 43 scientists 48 D-Index: 28 scientists 49 D-Index: 47 scientists 50 D-Index: 40 scientists 51 D-Index: 34 scientists 52 D-Index: 33 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 16 scientists 55 D-Index: 32 scientists 56 D-Index: 21 scientists 57 D-Index: 18 scientists 58 D-Index: 28 scientists 59 D-Index: 33 scientists 60 D-Index: 17 scientists 61 D-Index: 21 scientists 62 D-Index: 18 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 9 scientists 65 D-Index: 20 scientists 66 D-Index: 11 scientists 67 D-Index: 16 scientists 68 D-Index: 12 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 13 scientists 71 D-Index: 15 scientists 72 D-Index: 11 scientists 73 D-Index: 11 scientists 74 D-Index: 14 scientists 75 D-Index: 5 scientists 76 D-Index: 6 scientists 77+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 77+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more.

Overview

R.K. Miller is affiliated with Texas A&M University in the United States and has an extensive body of research primarily focused on agricultural and biological sciences. Their work is notably concentrated in the fields of animal science and zoology, food science, biomedical engineering, nutrition and dietetics, and small animals.

The main topics of Miller's research include:

  • Meat and animal product quality
  • Sensory analysis and statistical methods
  • Animal nutrition and physiology
  • Advanced chemical sensor technologies
  • Biochemical analysis and sensing techniques
  • Food quality and safety studies
  • Animal behavior and welfare studies

Miller has contributed significantly to journals such as Meat and Muscle Biology and Meat Science, each featuring eight publications by the author. Other frequent publication venues include the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports, Journal of Animal Science, and Foods.

Some of the recent notable papers authored or co-authored by Miller include:

  • "Drivers of Consumer Liking for Beef, Pork, and Lamb: A Review" (2020) published in Foods
  • "A 2020 Synopsis of the Cell-Cultured Animal Industry" (2020) published in Animal Frontiers
  • "Descriptive Beef Flavor and Texture Attributes Relationships with Consumer Acceptance of US Light Beef Eaters" (2023) published in Meat Science

Other relevant publications in the field, although not solely authored by Miller, indicate the broader research environment connected to their expertise:

  • "Meat Tenderness: Underlying Mechanisms, Instrumental Measurement, and Sensory Assessment" (2020) in Meat and Muscle Biology
  • "A Current Review of U.S. Beef Flavor II: Managing Beef Flavor" (2023) in Meat Science

Miller collaborates frequently with several researchers, including C. R. Kerth, Jerrad F. Legako, Dale R. Woerner, Mahesh N. Nair, and J.W. Savell, reflecting a network of partnerships within their field of study.

Best Publications

  • Consumer evaluation of beef of known categories of tenderness.

    S J Boleman;S L Boleman;R K Miller;J F Taylor

  • National beef tenderness survey.

    J B Morgan;J W Savell;D S Hale;R K Miller

  • Long-term results of two-stage hepatectomy for irresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases

    Dennis A. Wicherts;Rafael Miller;Robbert J. de Haas;Georgia Bitsakou

  • Beef customer satisfaction: role of cut, USDA quality grade, and city on in-home consumer ratings.

    T R Neely;C L Lorenzen;R K Miller;J D Tatum

  • A comparison of Warner-Bratzler shear force assessment within and among institutions

    T L Wheeler;S D Shackelford;L P Johnson;M F Miller

  • Dry versus wet aging of beef: Retail cutting yields and consumer palatability evaluations of steaks from US Choice and US Select short loins

    R.D. Smith;K.L. Nicholson;J.D.W. Nicholson;K.B. Harris

  • DEVELOPMENT OF A LEXICON FOR BEEF FLAVOR IN INTACT MUSCLE

    Koushik Adhikari;Edgar Chambers;Rhonda Miller;Laura Vázquez-Araújo

  • Performance, carcass, and palatability traits for cull cows fed high-energy concentrate diets for 0, 14, 28, 42 or 56 days

    T D Schnell;K E Belk;J D Tatum;R K Miller

  • Beef flavor: a review from chemistry to consumer.

    Chris R Kerth;Rhonda K Miller

  • Using calcium chloride injection to improve tenderness of beef from mature cows.

    J B Morgan;R K Miller;F M Mendez;D S Hale

  • Beef customer satisfaction: trained sensory panel ratings and Warner-Bratzler shear force values.

    C. L. Lorenzen;R. K. Miller;J. F. Taylor;T. R. Neely

  • Implant strategies during feeding : Impact on carcass grades and consumer acceptability

    D L Roeber;R C Cannell;K E Belk;R K Miller

  • Drivers of Consumer Liking for Beef, Pork, and Lamb: A Review

    Unknown

  • Beef customer satisfaction: cooking method and degree of doneness effects on the top round steak.

    T R Neely;C L Lorenzen;R K Miller;J D Tatum

  • Effect of Sodium Lactate on Microbial and Chemical Composition of Cooked Beef during Storage

    L. S. Papadopoulos;R. K. Miller;G. R. Acuff;C. Vanderzant

  • Factors influencing the variation in tenderness of seven major beef muscles from three Angus and Brahman breed crosses

    G.D. Stolowski;B.E. Baird;R.K. Miller;J.W. Savell

  • Consumer perceptions of pork eating quality as affected by pork quality attributes and end-point cooked temperature.

    S.J. Moeller;R.K. Miller;K.K. Edwards;H.N. Zerby

  • Comparison of sensory characteristics and fatty acid composition between Wagyu crossbred and Angus steers.

    S.G. May;C.A. Sturdivant;D.K. Lunt;R.K. Miller

  • National beef tenderness survey – 2006: Assessment of Warner–Bratzler shear and sensory panel ratings for beef from US retail and foodservice establishments

    K.L. Voges;C.L. Mason;J.C. Brooks;R.J. Delmore

  • Dry versus wet aging of beef: Retail cutting yields and consumer sensory attribute evaluations of steaks from ribeyes, strip loins, and top sirloins from two quality grade groups

    M.A. Laster;R.D. Smith;K.L. Nicholson;J.D.W. Nicholson

  • Sodium lactate effect on sensory characteristics, cooked meat color and chemical composition

    L.S. Papadopoulos;R.K. Miller;L.J. Ringer;H.R. Cross

  • Sodium Lactate Affects Pathogens in Cooked Beef

    R.K. Miller;G.R. Acuff

  • Principles of ultrasound and measurement of intramuscular fat.

    A D Whittaker;B Park;B R Thane;R K Miller

Frequent Co-Authors

J. W. Savell
J. W. Savell Texas A&M University
Chris R. Kerth
Chris R. Kerth Texas A&M University
Stephen B. Smith
Stephen B. Smith Texas A&M University
D. S. Hale
D. S. Hale Texas A&M University
Gary R. Acuff
Gary R. Acuff Texas A&M University
H.R. Cross
H.R. Cross Texas A&M University
Keith E. Belk
Keith E. Belk Colorado State University
Tryon A Wickersham
Tryon A Wickersham Texas A&M University
Jeremy F. Taylor
Jeremy F. Taylor University of Missouri
Rodger K. Johnson
Rodger K. Johnson University of Nebraska–Lincoln

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those passionate about studying Animal Science and Veterinary fields, there are numerous related online degrees to consider. Expanding into areas like counseling can complement your skills, especially when working with animals and their owners. Programs such as online marriage and family therapy programs offer flexible options to develop expertise in human-animal interaction dynamics and emotional support.

For professionals aiming to advance their academic qualifications, pursuing a phd in counseling online could open doors to specialized research or clinical roles involving animal-assisted therapy and behavioral studies.

Graduates can explore high paying jobs with animal science degree, ranging from veterinary specialists to wildlife conservationists. These career paths demand a deep understanding of animal biology combined with practical skills.

Interestingly, leadership roles like athletic directors require skills in team management and program coordination. Learning what does an athletic director do can inspire students to apply similar organizational expertise in managing large-scale animal care or research facilities.

Best Scientists Citing R.K. Miller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles