World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
32
Citations
4264
World Ranking
10923
National Ranking
5709

David H. Rakison publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David H. Rakison sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 90 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

David H. Rakison D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David H. Rakison sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Developmental origin of the animate-inanimate distinction.

    David H. Rakison;Diane Poulin-Dubois

  • Language is not Just for Talking Redundant Labels Facilitate Learning of Novel Categories

    Gary Lupyan;David H. Rakison;James L. McClelland

  • Infants' use of object parts in early categorization

    David H. Rakison;George E. Butterworth

  • Do Infants Possess an Evolved Spider-Detection Mechanism?.

    David H. Rakison;Jaime Derringer

  • Early Category and Concept Development: Making Sense of the Blooming, Buzzing Confusion

    David H. Rakison;Lisa M. Oakes

  • The development of relational category knowledge

    Dedre Gentner

  • Building object categories in developmental time.

    Lisa Gershkoff-Stowe;David H. Rakison

  • What we fear most: A developmental advantage for threat-relevant stimuli

    Vanessa LoBue;David H. Rakison

  • Threat Perception Across the Life Span Evidence for Multiple Converging Pathways

    Vanessa LoBue;David H. Rakison;Judy S. DeLoache

  • Infants' attention to object structure in early categorization

    David H. Rakison;George E. Butterworth

  • Does causal action facilitate causal perception in infants younger than 6 months of age

    David H. Rakison;Lauren Krogh

  • Developing Object Concepts in Infancy: An Associative Learning Perspective

    David H. Rakison;Gary Lupyan

  • Infants’ Use of Functional Parts in Basic-like Categorization

    David H. Rakison;Leslie B. Cohen

  • New perspectives on the effects of action on perceptual and cognitive development.

    David H. Rakison;Amanda L. Woodward

  • You go this way and i'll go that way: Developmental changes in infants' detection of correlations among static and dynamic features in motion events

    David H. Rakison;Diane Poulin-Dubois

  • Does women's greater fear of snakes and spiders originate in infancy?

    David H. Rakison

  • Correspondences between what infants see and know about causal and self-propelled motion.

    Jessica B. Cicchino;Richard N. Aslin;David H. Rakison

  • U-Shaped Curves in Development: A PDP Approach

    Timothy T. Rogers;David H. Rakison;James L. McClelland

  • Infants' attention to object structure in early categorization.

    Unknown

  • Exploring the neural correlates of goal-directed action and intention understanding

    Elizabeth J. Carter;Jessica K. Hodgins;David H. Rakison

Frequent Co-Authors

Lisa M. Oakes
Lisa M. Oakes University of California, Davis
Gary Lupyan
Gary Lupyan University of Wisconsin–Madison
Denis Mareschal
Denis Mareschal Birkbeck, University of London
Diane Poulin-Dubois
Diane Poulin-Dubois Concordia University
Leslie B. Cohen
Leslie B. Cohen The University of Texas at Austin
James L. McClelland
James L. McClelland Stanford University
Vanessa LoBue
Vanessa LoBue Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Paul C. Quinn
Paul C. Quinn University of Delaware
Cynthia R. Johnson
Cynthia R. Johnson Case Western Reserve University
Amanda L. Woodward
Amanda L. Woodward University of Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing David H. Rakison

Recently Published Articles