World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Gaetano Thiene

Gaetano Thiene

Award Badge
Medicine
Italy
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 140 1660 1536 34 30 1143 98837

Gaetano Thiene publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Gaetano Thiene between 1975 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Gaetano Thiene published across 51 years, from 1975 to 2025, averaging 24 papers a year. Output peaked at 68 publications in 2013. 51 of the 1,226 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1975 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 68. Peak 68 publications in 2013. 1975: 5 publications 1976: 7 publications 1977: 4 publications 1978: 7 publications 1979: 8 publications 1980: 7 publications 1981: 12 publications 1982: 11 publications 1983: 10 publications 1984: 19 publications 1985: 9 publications 1986: 9 publications 1987: 9 publications 1988: 14 publications 1989: 15 publications 1990: 19 publications 1991: 12 publications 1992: 16 publications 1993: 13 publications 1994: 14 publications 1995: 14 publications 1996: 12 publications 1997: 13 publications 1998: 20 publications 1999: 15 publications 2000: 24 publications 2001: 22 publications 2002: 26 publications 2003: 25 publications 2004: 37 publications 2005: 42 publications 2006: 35 publications 2007: 50 publications 2008: 42 publications 2009: 39 publications 2010: 54 publications 2011: 46 publications 2012: 40 publications 2013: 68 publications 2014: 30 publications 2015: 28 publications 2016: 48 publications 2017: 42 publications 2018: 41 publications 2019: 29 publications 2020: 32 publications 2021: 32 publications 2022: 23 publications 2023: 26 publications 2024: 23 publications 2025: 28 publications
1975 2025

1,226 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Gaetano Thiene: publications per year, 1975 to 2025
Year Publications
1975 5
1976 7
1977 4
1978 7
1979 8
1980 7
1981 12
1982 11
1983 10
1984 19
1985 9
1986 9
1987 9
1988 14
1989 15
1990 19
1991 12
1992 16
1993 13
1994 14
1995 14
1996 12
1997 13
1998 20
1999 15
2000 24
2001 22
2002 26
2003 25
2004 37
2005 42
2006 35
2007 50
2008 42
2009 39
2010 54
2011 46
2012 40
2013 68
2014 30
2015 28
2016 48
2017 42
2018 41
2019 29
2020 32
2021 32
2022 23
2023 26
2024 23
2025 28
Total 1,226
Download as CSV

Gaetano Thiene publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gaetano Thiene sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,141–1,160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,143 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51 1,143
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Gaetano Thiene D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gaetano Thiene sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 140–141 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 140 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134 140
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in Italy Leader Award

Overview

Gaetano Thiene is affiliated with the University of Padua in Italy. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a significant concentration in cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. Over the course of their career, they have contributed notably to several subfields including orthopedics and sports medicine, epidemiology, surgery, and pulmonary and respiratory medicine.

The scientist's work covers diverse topics, demonstrating a strong presence in cardiovascular-related research areas. Main topics include cardiovascular effects of exercise, cardiomyopathy and myosin studies, sports injuries and prevention, cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias, viral infections and immunology research, cardiac valve diseases and treatments, and cardiac arrest and resuscitation.

Gaetano Thiene has published in a wide range of peer-reviewed venues. Frequent publication platforms include:

  • European Heart Journal
  • International Journal of Cardiology
  • Cardiovascular Pathology
  • European Heart Journal Supplements
  • Circulation

The scientist's recent papers reflect their focus on cardiology and cardiac arrhythmias. These include:

  • Recognition and Initial Management of Fulminant Myocarditis, 2020, Circulation
  • Diagnosis of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy: The Padua criteria, 2020, International Journal of Cardiology
  • Ventricular Arrhythmias in Myocarditis, 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy: Characterization of Left Ventricular Phenotype and Differential Diagnosis With Dilated Cardiomyopathy, 2020, Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Evolving Diagnostic Criteria for Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy, 2021, Journal of the American Heart Association

Collaboration has been an important aspect of their research, with frequent co-authors including Cristina Basso, Stefania Rizzo, Kalliopi Pilichou, Domenico Corrado, and Monica De Gaspari.

Best Publications

  • Contemporary Definitions and Classification of the Cardiomyopathies An American Heart Association Scientific Statement From the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Heart Failure and Transplantation Committee; Quality of Care and Outcomes Research and Functional Genomics and Translational Biology Interdisciplinary Working Groups; and Council on Epidemiology and Prevention

    Barry J. Maron;Jeffrey A. Towbin;Gaetano Thiene;Charles Antzelevitch

  • Report of the 1995 World Health Organization/International Society and Federation of Cardiology Task Force on the Definition and Classification of cardiomyopathies.

    P Richardson;W McKenna;M Bristow;B Maisch

  • Current state of knowledge on aetiology, diagnosis, management, and therapy of myocarditis: a position statement of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases.

    Alida L. P. Caforio;Sabine Pankuweit;Eloisa Arbustini;Cristina Basso

  • Diagnosis of Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy/Dysplasia Proposed Modification of the Task Force Criteria

    Frank I. Marcus;William J. McKenna;Duane Sherrill;Cristina Basso

  • Diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy. Task Force of the Working Group Myocardial and Pericardial Disease of the European Society of Cardiology and of the Scientific Council on Cardiomyopathies of the International Society and Federation of Cardiology.

    Wj Mckenna;Gaetano Thiene;Andrea Nava;F Fontaliran

  • Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy and Sudden Death in Young People

    Gaetano Thiene;Andrea Nava;Domenico Corrado;Lino Rossi

  • Trends in sudden cardiovascular death in young competitive athletes after implementation of a preparticipation screening program.

    Domenico Corrado;Cristina Basso;Andrea Pavei;Pierantonio Michieli

  • Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases executive summary; The Task force on the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases of the European society of cardiology.

    Bernhard Maisch;Petar M. Seferovi;Arsen D. Risti;Witold Z. Tomkowski

  • Does sports activity enhance the risk of sudden death in adolescents and young adults

    Domenico Corrado;Cristina Basso;Giulio Rizzoli;Maurizio Schiavon

  • Diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia

    Frank I. Marcus;William J. McKenna;Duane Sherrill;Cristina Basso

  • Cardiovascular pre-participation screening of young competitive athletes for prevention of sudden death: proposal for a common European protocol Consensus Statement of the Study Group of Sport Cardiology of the Working Group of Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology and the Working Group of Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology

    Domenico Corrado;Antonio Pelliccia;Hans Halvor Bjørnstad;Luc Vanhees

  • Clinical profile of congenital coronary artery anomalies with origin from the wrong aortic sinus leading to sudden death in young competitive athletes.

    Cristina Basso;Barry J Maron;Domenico Corrado;Gaetano Thiene

  • Screening for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in young athletes.

    Domenico Corrado;Cristina Basso;Maurizio Schiavon;Gaetano Thiene

  • Recommendations for competitive sports participation in athletes with cardiovascular disease : a consensus document from the study group of sports cardiology of the working group of cardiac rehabilitation and exercise physiology and the working group of myocardial and pericardial diseases of the european society of cardiology

    Antonio Pelliccia;Robert Fagard;Hans Halvor Bjørnstad;Aris Anastassakis

  • Spectrum of Clinicopathologic Manifestations of Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy/Dysplasia: A Multicenter Study

    Domenico Corrado;Cristina Basso;Gaetano Thiene;William J McKenna

  • Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy. Dysplasia, Dystrophy, or Myocarditis?

    Cristina Basso;Gaetano Thiene;Domenico Corrado;Annalisa Angelini

  • Recommendations for interpretation of 12-lead electrocardiogram in the athlete

    Domenico Corrado;Antonio Pelliccia;Hein Heidbuchel;Sanjay Sharma

  • Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy

    Cristina Basso;Domenico Corrado;Frank I Marcus;Andrea Nava

  • Identification of mutations in the cardiac ryanodine receptor gene in families affected with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy type 2 (ARVD2)

    Natascia Tiso;Dietrich A. Stephan;Andrea Nava;Alessia Bagattin

  • Guidelines on prevention, diagnosis and treatment of infective endocarditis executive summary; the task force on infective endocarditis of the European society of cardiology.

    Dieter Horstkotte;Ferenc Follath;Erno Gutschik;Maria Lengyel

Frequent Co-Authors

Cristina Basso
Cristina Basso University of Padua
Domenico Corrado
Domenico Corrado University of Padua
Sabino Iliceto
Sabino Iliceto University of Padua
William J. McKenna
William J. McKenna University College London
Antonio Pelliccia
Antonio Pelliccia Italian National Olympic Committee
Hugh Calkins
Hugh Calkins Johns Hopkins University
Barry J. Maron
Barry J. Maron University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Frank I. Marcus
Frank I. Marcus University of Arizona
Jeffrey E. Saffitz
Jeffrey E. Saffitz Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Mary N. Sheppard
Mary N. Sheppard St George's, University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in medicine but seeking alternative or accelerated routes, online degrees offer flexible pathways. Many healthcare professionals are turning to advanced nursing degrees thanks to convenience, shorter duration, and career advancement potential.

For instance, a 1 year dnp program online allows experienced nurses to fast-track their doctorates, opening doors to higher leadership roles and specialized practice. If you’re looking for flexible formats, several reputable institutions now offer comprehensive online dnp programs that emphasize both accessibility and academic rigor.

Those at the start of their healthcare journey might explore fast track lpn programs for a quicker entry into patient care, with many options designed to prepare students for licensure in under a year. Additionally, if your passion lies in mental health, check out accelerated msn psychiatric np programs to qualify for in-demand psychiatric nurse practitioner roles at an expedited pace.

These online pathways enable busy professionals and aspiring nurses to advance their careers, meet the growing healthcare demand, and specialize in emerging fields—all without compromising work or personal commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Gaetano Thiene

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles