World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
93
Citations
44435
World Ranking
10685
National Ranking
580

Karin Klingel publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karin Klingel sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 575 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Karin Klingel D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karin Klingel sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Karin Klingel is affiliated with the University of Tübingen in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine with a strong emphasis on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Their work spans several subfields, including Molecular Biology, Infectious Diseases, Surgery, and Epidemiology.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics related to Viral Infections and Immunology Research, Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies, and Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise. Additional research areas include Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair, COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies, SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research, and Amyloidosis covering diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes.

Key publication venues for their work include:

  • European Heart Journal
  • Viruses
  • Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • ESC Heart Failure

Frequent collaborators in their research efforts include:

  • Carsten Tschöpe
  • Hendrik Milting
  • Bettina Heidecker
  • Franziska Seidel
  • Jan Gummert

Some of their notable recent papers are:

  • Myocarditis and inflammatory cardiomyopathy: current evidence and future directions, 2020, Nature Reviews Cardiology
  • Management of Acute Myocarditis and Chronic Inflammatory Cardiomyopathy, 2020, Circulation Heart Failure
  • Spatial multi-omic map of human myocardial infarction, 2022, Nature
  • SARS-CoV-2 infects and induces cytotoxic effects in human cardiomyocytes, 2020, Cardiovascular Research
  • COVID-19 pandemic and troponin: indirect myocardial injury, myocardial inflammation or myocarditis?, 2020, Heart

Best Publications

  • Current state of knowledge on aetiology, diagnosis, management, and therapy of myocarditis: a position statement of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases.

    Alida L. P. Caforio;Sabine Pankuweit;Eloisa Arbustini;Cristina Basso

  • 2015 ESC Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Pericardial Diseases.

    Yehuda Adler;Philippe Charron;Massimo Imazio;Luigi Badano

  • Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Assessment of Human Myocarditis: A Comparison to Histology and Molecular Pathology

    Heiko Mahrholdt;Christine Goedecke;Anja Wagner;Gabriel Meinhardt

  • Simultaneous PET-MRI: a new approach for functional and morphological imaging

    Martin S. Judenhofer;Hans F. Wehrl;Danny F. Newport;Ciprian Catana

  • Update on myocarditis.

    Ingrid Kindermann;Christine Barth;Felix Mahfoud;Christian Ukena

  • Proposal for a revised definition of dilated cardiomyopathy, hypokinetic non-dilated cardiomyopathy, and its implications for clinical practice : a position statement of the ESC working group on myocardial and pericardial diseases

    Yigal M Pinto;Perry M Elliott;Eloisa Arbustini;Yehuda Adler

  • Presentation, Patterns of Myocardial Damage, and Clinical Course of Viral Myocarditis

    Heiko Mahrholdt;Anja Wagner;Claudia C. Deluigi;Eva Kispert

  • Hypomagnesemia with secondary hypocalcemia is caused by mutations in TRPM6, a new member of the TRPM gene family.

    Karl P Schlingmann;Stefanie Weber;Melanie Peters;Lene Niemann Nejsum

  • Myocarditis and inflammatory cardiomyopathy: current evidence and future directions.

    Carsten Tschöpe;Enrico Ammirati;Biykem Bozkurt;Biykem Bozkurt;Alida L.P. Caforio

  • Predictors of Outcome in Patients With Suspected Myocarditis

    Ingrid Kindermann;Michael Kindermann;Reinhard Kandolf;Karin Klingel

  • Long-Term Follow-Up of Biopsy-Proven Viral Myocarditis: Predictors of Mortality and Incomplete Recovery

    Stefan Grün;Julia Schumm;Simon Greulich;Anja Wagner

  • Unexpected Abundance of HLA Class II Presented Peptides in Primary Renal Cell Carcinomas

    Jörn Dengjel;Maria-Dorothea Nastke;Cécile Gouttefangeas;Gitsios Gitsioudis

  • Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Clinically Suspected Cardiac Amyloidosis: Noninvasive Imaging Compared to Endomyocardial Biopsy

    Holger Vogelsberg;Heiko Mahrholdt;Claudia C. Deluigi;Ali Yilmaz

  • Management of Acute Myocarditis and Chronic Inflammatory Cardiomyopathy: An Expert Consensus Document.

    Enrico Ammirati;Maria Frigerio;Eric D. Adler;Cristina Basso

  • Comparative Evaluation of Left and Right Ventricular Endomyocardial Biopsy Differences in Complication Rate and Diagnostic Performance

    Ali Yilmaz;Ingrid Kindermann;Michael Kindermann;Felix Mahfoud

  • Impaired renal Na+ retention in the sgk1-knockout mouse

    Peer Wulff;Volker Vallon;Dan Yang Huang;Harald Völkl

  • Enterovirus infection in human pancreatic islet cells, islet tropism in vivo and receptor involvement in cultured islet beta cells.

    P. Ylipaasto;K. Klingel;A. M. Lindberg;T. Otonkoski

  • Comprehensive Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Suspected Myocarditis: The MyoRacer-Trial.

    Philipp Lurz;Christian Luecke;Ingo Eitel;Felix Föhrenbach

  • Myeloperoxidase acts as a profibrotic mediator of atrial fibrillation.

    Volker Rudolph;René P. Andrié;Tanja K. Rudolph;Kai Friedrichs

  • Human parvovirus B19-associated myocarditis.

    Claus-Thomas Bock;Karin Klingel;Reinhard Kandolf

Frequent Co-Authors

Reinhard Kandolf
Reinhard Kandolf University of Tübingen
Meinrad Gawaz
Meinrad Gawaz University of Tübingen
Udo Sechtem
Udo Sechtem Robert Bosch (Germany)
Carsten Tschöpe
Carsten Tschöpe Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Florian Lang
Florian Lang University of Tübingen
Heinz-Peter Schultheiss
Heinz-Peter Schultheiss Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Holger Thiele
Holger Thiele Leipzig University
Siegfried Waldegger
Siegfried Waldegger Innsbruck Medical University
Stefan Bröer
Stefan Bröer Australian National University
Uwe Völker
Uwe Völker University of Greifswald

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related fields can open up diverse career opportunities in healthcare, especially if you are considering alternatives to a traditional medical degree. For those interested in the administrative side, pursuing a degree in healthcare administration equips you with leadership and management skills essential for running hospitals or clinics.

If direct patient care is your focus, there are programs designed to streamline your path. Many professionals advance from RN to nurse practitioner through rn to np programs, enabling higher qualifications and independence in practice.

Flexibility is also available for aspiring nurses—some nursing school that doesn't require teas make it easier to get started without standardized test barriers.

For those inclined toward healthcare technology, enrolling in medical billing and coding schools with financial aid offers a pathway to administrative roles that are in high demand.

Each of these online options provides unique pathways to rewarding healthcare careers, with more flexibility and accessibility than ever before.

Best Scientists Citing Karin Klingel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles