World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
73
Citations
17935
World Ranking
2214
National Ranking
1053

Philip W. Landfield publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip W. Landfield sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 131 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Philip W. Landfield D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip W. Landfield sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2009 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Philip W. Landfield is affiliated with the University of Kentucky in the United States. Their academic focus is centered around scientific research, with recognized contributions sanctioned through professional acknowledgment.

In 2009, Philip W. Landfield was awarded the distinction of Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), a designation reflecting peer recognition in their scientific domain.

There are no documented recent papers, coauthors, or frequent publication venues currently available for Philip W. Landfield.

Similarly, specific fields, subfields of study, book publications, and primary topics of research conducted by Philip W. Landfield have not been provided in the available data.

Best Publications

  • Incipient Alzheimer's disease: Microarray correlation analyses reveal major transcriptional and tumor suppressor responses

    Eric M. Blalock;James W. Geddes;Kuey Chu Chen;Nada M. Porter

  • Brain Aging Correlates: Retardation by Hormonal-Pharmacological Treatments

    PW Landfield;RK Baskin;TA Pitler

  • Prolonged Ca2+-dependent afterhyperpolarizations in hippocampal neurons of aged rats

    Philip W. Landfield;Thomas A. Pitler

  • Hippocampal aging and adrenocorticoids: quantitative correlations

    P. W. Landfield;Jack C Waymire;G. Lynch

  • Gene microarrays in hippocampal aging: statistical profiling identifies novel processes correlated with cognitive impairment.

    Eric M. Blalock;Kuey-Chu Chen;Keith Sharrow;James P. Herman

  • Vitamin D hormone confers neuroprotection in parallel with downregulation of L-type calcium channel expression in hippocampal neurons.

    Lawrence D. Brewer;Veronique Thibault;Kuey-Chu Chen;Moises C. Langub

  • Increase in Single L-Type Calcium Channels in Hippocampal Neurons During Aging

    Olivier Thibault;Philip W. Landfield

  • Impaired synaptic potentiation processes in the hippocampus of aged, memory-deficient rats.

    Philip W. Landfield;James L. McGaugh;Gary Lynch

  • Statistical implications of pooling RNA samples for microarray experiments

    Xuejun Peng;Constance L Wood;Eric M Blalock;Kuey Chu Chen

  • Corticosteroid modulation of hippocampal potentials: increased effect with aging.

    Kerr Ds;Campbell Lw;Hao Sy;Landfield Pw

  • Chronic stress-induced acceleration of electrophysiologic and morphometric biomarkers of hippocampal aging.

    DS Kerr;LW Campbell;Applegate;A Brodish

  • Expansion of the calcium hypothesis of brain aging and Alzheimer's disease: minding the store

    Olivier Thibault;John C. Gant;Philip W. Landfield

  • Long-term potentiation : from biophysics to behavior

    Philip W. Landfield;Sam A. Deadwyler

  • Calcineurin Triggers Reactive/Inflammatory Processes in Astrocytes and Is Upregulated in Aging and Alzheimer's Models

    Christopher M. Norris;Inga Kadish;Eric M. Blalock;Kuey-Chu Chen

  • Patterns of Astroglial Hypertrophy and Neuronal Degeneration in the Hippocampus of Aged, Memory-deficient Rats

    Philip W. Landfield;Gregory Rose;Lisa Sandles;Thomas C. Wohlstadter

  • Elevated postsynaptic [Ca2+]i and L-type calcium channel activity in aged hippocampal neurons: relationship to impaired synaptic plasticity.

    Olivier Thibault;Robert Hadley;Philip W. Landfield

  • Increased calcium-current hypothesis of brain aging

    Philip W. Landfield

  • Hippocampal glucocorticoid receptor activation enhances voltage-dependent Ca2+ conductances: relevance to brain aging.

    D S Kerr;L W Campbell;O Thibault;P W Landfield

  • Microarray analyses of laser-captured hippocampus reveal distinct gray and white matter signatures associated with incipient Alzheimer's disease

    Eric M. Blalock;Heather M. Buechel;Jelena Popovic;James W. Geddes

  • Ca2+ regulation and gene expression in normal brain aging.

    Emil C. Toescu;Alexei Verkhratsky;Philip W. Landfield

Frequent Co-Authors

Olivier Thibault
Olivier Thibault University of Kentucky
Nada M. Porter
Nada M. Porter University of Kentucky
James L. McGaugh
James L. McGaugh University of California, Irvine
Gary Lynch
Gary Lynch University of California, Irvine
James P. Herman
James P. Herman University of Cincinnati
Thomas C. Foster
Thomas C. Foster University of Florida
Michela Gallagher
Michela Gallagher Johns Hopkins University
Susan M. Resnick
Susan M. Resnick National Institutes of Health
William R. Markesbery
William R. Markesbery University of Kentucky
Kristine Yaffe
Kristine Yaffe University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students intrigued by neuroscience, a range of cheap psychology degree online options are available, offering affordability and flexibility. These programs lay the foundation for a career in mental health, research, or counseling, while delving into human behavior and brain function.

Many also consider advancing their expertise with a masters in psychology. This degree can broaden career opportunities, allowing graduates to pursue roles in clinical psychology, academia, or specialized research.

Those interested in therapeutic practice may explore a marriage and family therapist degree. This path focuses on understanding and treating emotional and relational challenges, grounded in psychological science.

Alternatively, social work offers another interdisciplinary route. Prospective students often ask, how long does it take to get a msw online? Most programs can be completed within two years and open doors in clinical, community, or healthcare settings.

Best Scientists Citing Philip W. Landfield

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles