World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jonathan D. Geiger

Jonathan D. Geiger

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 64 3291 3010 193 174 204 13640

Jonathan D. Geiger publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jonathan D. Geiger between 1979 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jonathan D. Geiger published across 47 years, from 1979 to 2025, averaging 4.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2002. 9 of the 217 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1979 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2002. 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 7 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 8 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 16 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 1 publication
1979 2025

217 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jonathan D. Geiger: publications per year, 1979 to 2025
Year Publications
1979 1
1980 0
1981 0
1982 1
1983 0
1984 4
1985 5
1986 4
1987 7
1988 5
1989 2
1990 8
1991 7
1992 4
1993 3
1994 3
1995 3
1996 8
1997 3
1998 3
1999 4
2000 9
2001 3
2002 16
2003 6
2004 3
2005 2
2006 2
2007 3
2008 9
2009 5
2010 4
2011 4
2012 7
2013 2
2014 8
2015 3
2016 3
2017 3
2018 3
2019 13
2020 7
2021 10
2022 5
2023 3
2024 8
2025 1
Total 217
Download as CSV

Jonathan D. Geiger publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan D. Geiger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 198–207 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 204 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306 204
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Jonathan D. Geiger D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan D. Geiger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64–65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278 64
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Jonathan D. Geiger is affiliated with the University of Manitoba in Canada. Their research spans multiple fields with a primary focus on Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology. Within these disciplines, Geiger has contributed notably to subfields such as Physiology, Epidemiology, Virology, Cell Biology, and Molecular Biology.

The scientist's work centers around several main topics including:

  • Calcium signaling and nucleotide metabolism
  • Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • HIV Research and Treatment
  • Mosquito-borne diseases and control
  • Cellular transport and secretion
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research

Jonathan D. Geiger has published extensively in notable scientific journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  • Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology
  • Frontiers in Pharmacology
  • Viruses
  • The FASEB Journal

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Geiger reflect a focus on cellular function, infectious diseases, and therapeutic mechanisms. Selected publications include:

  • "Lysosomal Stress Response (LSR): Physiological Importance and Pathological Relevance," 2021, Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology
  • "Overcoming Chemoresistance: Altering pH of Cellular Compartments by Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine," 2021, Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
  • "Role of Endolysosomes in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 Infection and Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pathogenesis: Implications for Potential Treatments," 2020, Frontiers in Pharmacology
  • "Janus sword actions of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine against COVID-19," 2020, Cellular Signalling
  • "Two-pore channels regulate Tat endolysosome escape and Tat-mediated HIV-1 LTR transactivation," 2020, The FASEB Journal

The collaborative nature of Geiger's research is evident through frequent co-authors, who have contributed to numerous publications together. These co-authors include:

  • Peter W. Halcrow
  • Nabab Khan
  • Xuesong Chen
  • Nirmal Kumar
  • Zahra Afghah

Best Publications

  • Mitochondrial biogenesis in the anticonvulsant mechanism of the ketogenic diet.

    Kristopher J. Bough;Kristopher J. Bough;Jonathon Wetherington;Bjørnar Hassel;Jean Francois Pare

  • Calcium signaling in the ER: its role in neuronal plasticity and neurodegenerative disorders

    Mark P Mattson;Frank M LaFerla;Sic L Chan;Malcolm A Leissring

  • Presenilin-1 Mutations Increase Levels of Ryanodine Receptors and Calcium Release in PC12 Cells and Cortical Neurons

    Sic L. Chan;Michael Mayne;Clark P. Holden;Jonathan D. Geiger

  • Dietary supplement creatine protects against traumatic brain injury.

    Patrick G. Sullivan;Jonathan D. Geiger;Jonathan D. Geiger;T. Mark P. Mattson;Stephen W. Scheff

  • Identification of a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat epitope that is neuroexcitatory and neurotoxic.

    Avindra Nath;Karen Psooy;Carol Martin;Bodo Knudsen

  • Brain Glycogen Decreases with Increased Periods of Wakefulness: Implications for Homeostatic Drive to Sleep

    Jiming Kong;P. Nicolas Shepel;Clark P. Holden;Mirek Mackiewicz

  • Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 tat activates non-N-methyl-D-aspartate excitatory amino acid receptors and causes neurotoxicity.

    David S. K. Magnuson;Bodo E. Knudsen;Jonathan D. Geiger;Robert M. Brownstone

  • Neurobiological aspects of human immunodeficiency virus infection: neurotoxic mechanisms.

    Avindra Nath;Jonathan Geiger

  • HIV-1 Tat through phosphorylation of NMDA receptors potentiates glutamate excitotoxicity.

    N. J. Haughey;N. J. Haughey;A. Nath;M. P. Mattson;J. T. Slevin

  • Synergistic neurotoxicity by human immunodeficiency virus proteins Tat and gp120: protection by memantine.

    Avindra Nath;Norman J. Haughey;Melina Jones;Caroline Anderson

  • Adenosine A2A receptors and brain injury: Broad spectrum of neuroprotection, multifaceted actions and “fine tuning” modulation

    Jiang Fan Chen;Patricia K. Sonsalla;Felicita Pedata;Alessia Melani

  • Involvement of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate-regulated stores of intracellular calcium in calcium dysregulation and neuron cell death caused by HIV-1 protein tat.

    N. J. Haughey;C.P. Holden;A. Nath;J.D. Geiger

  • Tumor necrosis factor‐α‐induced neutral sphingomyelinase‐2 modulates synaptic plasticity by controlling the membrane insertion of NMDA receptors

    David Wheeler;Edward Knapp;Veera V.R. Bandaru;Yue Wang

  • Caffeine protects against MPTP‐induced blood‐brain barrier dysfunction in mouse striatum

    Unknown

  • Adenosine A2A receptor activation reduces proinflammatory events and decreases cell death following intracerebral hemorrhage

    Michael Mayne;Julie Fotheringham;Hui Jin Yan;Christopher Power

  • Presence and functional significance of presynaptic ryanodine receptors.

    Ron Bouchard;Roberto Pattarini;Jonathan D. Geiger

  • Caffeine protects against oxidative stress and Alzheimer's disease-like pathology in rabbit hippocampus induced by cholesterol-enriched diet

    Jaya R.P. Prasanthi;Bhanu Dasari;Gurdeep Marwarha;Tyler Larson

  • Neuronal excitatory properties of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 tat protein

    J Cheng;A Nath;B Knudsen;S Hochman

  • Caffeine blocks disruption of blood brain barrier in a rabbit model of Alzheimer's disease

    Xuesong Chen;Jeremy W Gawryluk;John F Wagener;Othman Ghribi

  • Characterization and localization of adenosine receptors in rat spinal cord

    JD Geiger;FS LaBella;JI Nagy

  • Caffeine protects against disruptions of the blood-brain barrier in animal models of Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases.

    Xuesong Chen;Othman Ghribi;Jonathan D. Geiger

Frequent Co-Authors

James I. Nagy
James I. Nagy University of Manitoba
Norman J. Haughey
Norman J. Haughey Tulane University
Avindra Nath
Avindra Nath National Institutes of Health
Mark P. Mattson
Mark P. Mattson Johns Hopkins University
Allan I. Pack
Allan I. Pack University of Pennsylvania
Christopher Power
Christopher Power University of Alberta
David S.K. Magnuson
David S.K. Magnuson University of Louisville
Shawn Hochman
Shawn Hochman Emory University
Sic L. Chan
Sic L. Chan University of Central Florida
Robert M. Brownstone
Robert M. Brownstone University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience can open doors to diverse online degree options and rewarding career paths. Some students look for easiest bachelor degree to get online to kickstart their academic journey or to supplement their main area of study in neuroscience. Others are keen to combine passion and a high salary by reviewing fun majors in college that pay well in the sciences or related fields.

Online education offers plenty of flexibility for aspiring neuroscience professionals. Many online colleges that accept financial aid make it easier and more affordable to pursue a degree or certificate without compromising quality. If you’re looking to boost your credentials quickly, certificate programs that pay well can provide valuable skills in fields like data analysis, health technology, and research methods—all highly applicable to neuroscience careers. Consider these online options to create your own unique pathway into neuroscience and related professional opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan D. Geiger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles