World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
52
Citations
8058
World Ranking
5396
National Ranking
2398

Pamela E. Knapp publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pamela E. Knapp sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 150 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Pamela E. Knapp D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pamela E. Knapp sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Activation of the caspase-3 apoptotic cascade in traumatic spinal cord injury.

    Joe E. Springer;Robert D. Azbill;Pamela E. Knapp

  • Synergistic increases in intracellular Ca2+, and the release of MCP-1, RANTES, and IL-6 by astrocytes treated with opiates and HIV-1 Tat.

    Nazira El-Hage;Julie A. Gurwell;Indrapal N. Singh;Pamela E. Knapp

  • Active, phosphorylated fingolimod inhibits histone deacetylases and facilitates fear extinction memory

    Nitai C Hait;Laura E Wise;Jeremy C Allegood;Megan O'Brien

  • Oligodendroglial cell death in jimpy mice: an explanation for the myelin deficit

    Unknown

  • Exposure to cell phone radiation up-regulates apoptosis genes in primary cultures of neurons and astrocytes.

    Tian-Yong Zhao;Shi-Ping Zou;Pamela E. Knapp

  • Synaptic Dysfunction in the Hippocampus Accompanies Learning and Memory Deficits in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type-1 Tat Transgenic Mice

    Sylvia Fitting;Bogna M. Ignatowska-Jankowska;Cecilia Bull;Robert P. Skoff

  • Cultured oligodendrocytes mimic in vivo phenotypic characteristics: Cell shape, expression of myelin-specific antigens, and membrane production☆

    P.E. Knapp;W.P. Bartlett;R.P. Skoff

  • Morphine causes rapid increases in glial activation and neuronal injury in the striatum of inducible HIV‐1 tat transgenic mice

    Annadora J. Bruce-Keller;Jadwiga Turchan-Cholewo;Eric J. Smart;Theresa Geurin

  • Division of astroblasts and oligodendroblasts in postnatal rodent brain: evidence for separate astrocyte and oligodendrocyte lineages.

    Robert P. Skoff;Pamela E. Knapp

  • HIV-1 Tat and opiate-induced changes in astrocytes promote chemotaxis of microglia through the expression of MCP-1 and alternative chemokines.

    Nazira El-Hage;Guanghan Wu;Juan Wang;Jayakrishna Ambati

  • Rat Nucleus Accumbens Core Astrocytes Modulate Reward and the Motivation to Self-Administer Ethanol after Abstinence

    Cecilia Bull;Kelen C C Freitas;Shiping Zou;Ryan S Poland

  • Interactive comorbidity between opioid drug abuse and HIV-1 Tat: chronic exposure augments spine loss and sublethal dendritic pathology in striatal neurons.

    Sylvia Fitting;Ruqiang Xu;Cecilia Bull;Shreya K. Buch

  • Anti-death properties of TNF against metabolic poisoning: mitochondrial stabilization by MnSOD.

    Annadora J Bruce-Keller;James W Geddes;Pamela E Knapp;Robert W McFall

  • Opioid System Diversity in Developing Neurons, Astroglia and Oligodendroglia in the Subventricular Zone and Striatum: Impact on Gliogenesis In Vivo

    Anne Stiene-Martin;Pamela E. Knapp;Kenneth Martin;Julie A. Gurwell

  • Prodynorphin Mutations Cause the Neurodegenerative Disorder Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 23

    Georgy Bakalkin;Hiroyuki Watanabe;Justyna Jezierska;Cloë Depoorter

  • Morphine Exacerbates HIV-1 Tat-Induced Cytokine Production in Astrocytes through Convergent Effects on [Ca2+]i, NF-κB Trafficking and Transcription

    Nazira El-Hage;Annadora J. Bruce-Keller;Tatiana Yakovleva;Igor Bazov

  • Morphine and HIV-Tat increase microglial-free radical production and oxidative stress: possible role in cytokine regulation.

    Jadwiga Turchan-Cholewo;Filomena O. Dimayuga;Sunita Gupta;Jeffrey N. Keller

  • Apoptotic death of striatal neurons induced by human immunodeficiency virus-1 Tat and gp120: Differential involvement of caspase-3 and endonuclease G.

    Indrapal N Singh;Robin J Goody;Celeste Dean;Nael M Ahmad

  • Endogenous opioid system in developing normal and jimpy oligodendrocytes: mu and kappa opioid receptors mediate differential mitogenic and growth responses.

    Pamela E. Knapp;Katalin Maderspach;Kurt F. Hauser

  • Morphine potentiates neurodegenerative effects of HIV-1 Tat through actions at µ-opioid receptor-expressing glia

    Shiping Zou;Sylvia Fitting;Yun-Kyung Hahn;Sandra P. Welch

  • HIV-1 neuropathogenesis: glial mechanisms revealed through substance abuse.

    Kurt F. Hauser;Nazira El-Hage;Anne Stiene-Martin;William F. Maragos

  • Opiate Drug Use and the Pathophysiology of NeuroAIDS

    Kurt F Hauser;Sylvia Fitting;Seth M Dever;Elizabeth M Podhaizer

  • Pathobiology of dynorphins in trauma and disease

    Kurt F. Hauser;Jane V. Aldrich;Kevin J. Anderson;Georgy Bakalkin

Frequent Co-Authors

Kurt F. Hauser
Kurt F. Hauser Virginia Commonwealth University
Avindra Nath
Avindra Nath National Institutes of Health
Georgy Bakalkin
Georgy Bakalkin Uppsala University
Aron H. Lichtman
Aron H. Lichtman Virginia Commonwealth University
Marina Mata
Marina Mata University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jeffrey N. Keller
Jeffrey N. Keller Pennington Biomedical Research Center
Kazuhiro Ikenaka
Kazuhiro Ikenaka National Institutes of Natural Sciences
Stephen W. Scheff
Stephen W. Scheff University of Kentucky
Andreas Faissner
Andreas Faissner Ruhr University Bochum
Richard J. Sinke
Richard J. Sinke University Medical Center Groningen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Neuroscience graduates have a wide array of online degree options to further specialize their expertise and broaden their career opportunities. For those interested in mental health or community support careers, pursuing cheap online msw programs can offer a cost-effective pathway into social work roles that often overlap with neuropsychological care.

If you are interested in behavior analysis, consider online bcba programs. These programs provide comprehensive training for future Board Certified Behavior Analysts (BCBAs), enabling graduates to support individuals with behavioral or developmental challenges—an area strongly connected to neuroscience principles.

For students looking to accelerate their education, social work accelerated program options can help expedite your transition into the workforce while building skills in allied fields. Similarly, accelerated psychology degree programs offer an intensive path for those interested in the psychological aspects of neuroscience or in pursuing licensure as a psychologist.

These flexible online programs allow neuroscience students and professionals to enhance their credentials and pursue diverse career pathways, from clinical practice to applied research and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Pamela E. Knapp

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles