World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
56
Citations
9093
World Ranking
4596
National Ranking
2074

Marina Mata publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marina Mata sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 140 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Marina Mata D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marina Mata sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marina Mata is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the broad discipline of Neuroscience, with specific focus on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Genetics, Molecular Biology, and Internal Medicine.

The research topics covered by Marina Mata include:

  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Renal and related cancers
  • Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
  • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management

Marina Mata has co-authored multiple papers with researchers including Arantxa Gelabert, Jesús Aibar, Núria Albacar, Pedro Castro, and Sònia Jiménez, each appearing as co-authors on two publications.

The recent papers authored or co-authored by Marina Mata span several years and publication venues, reflecting interdisciplinary research interests. These include:

  • Case series of kidney transplantation in two pediatric recipients with rare genetic diseases and intellectual disability, 2024, BMC Pediatrics
  • Clinical Outcomes and Treatment Strategies in Catastrophic High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: A Retrospective Analysis, 2025, Preprints.org
  • Clinical Outcomes and Treatment Strategies in Catastrophic High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: A Retrospective Analysis, 2025, Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease

Additionally, Mata contributed to earlier work such as Reduction of Voltage Gated Sodium Channel Protein in DRG by Vector Mediated miRNA Reduces Pain in Rats with Painful Diabetic Neuropathy, published in 2020 in UNC Libraries.

The distribution of publications across different venues indicates a focus on pediatrics, cardiovascular medicine, and neuroscience-related topics. These venues include UNC Libraries, BMC Pediatrics, Preprints.org, and the Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease.

Best Publications

  • Activity-Dependent Energy Metabolism in Rat Posterior Pituitary Primarily Reflects Sodium Pump Activity

    Marina Mata;David J. Fink;Harold Gainer;Carolyn B. Smith

  • Metabolic mapping of functional activity in the hypothalamo-neurohypophysial system of the rat

    William J. Schwartz;Carolyn B. Smith;Leslie Davidsen;Helen Savaki

  • Deletion of multiple immediate-early genes from herpes simplex virus reduces cytotoxicity and permits long-term gene expression in neurons.

    D. M. Krisky;D. Wolfe;W. F. Goins;P. C. Marconi

  • In vivo expression of β-galactosidase in hippocampal neurons by HSV-mediated gene transfer

    David J. Fink;Lawrence R. Sternberg;Lawrence R. Sternberg;Peter C. Weber;Peter C. Weber;Marina Mata

  • Gene therapy for pain: Results of a phase I clinical trial

    David J. Fink;James Wechuck;Marina Mata;Joseph C. Glorioso

  • Antinociceptive effect of a genomic herpes simplex virus-based vector expressing human proenkephalin in rat dorsal root ganglion.

    J R Goss;M Mata;M Mata;W F Goins;H H Wu

  • IL-10 promotes neuronal survival following spinal cord injury.

    Zhigang Zhou;Xiangmin Peng;Ryan Insolera;David J. Fink

  • HSV-mediated expression of interleukin-4 in dorsal root ganglion neurons reduces neuropathic pain.

    Shuanglin Hao;Marina Mata;Joseph C Glorioso;David J Fink

  • Transgene-mediated enkephalin release enhances the effect of morphine and evades tolerance to produce a sustained antiallodynic effect in neuropathic pain.

    Shuanglin Hao;Marina Mata;William Goins;Joseph C. Glorioso

  • S100 is preferentially distributed in myelin-forming Schwann cells.

    Marina Mata;Diane M. Alessi;David J. Fink

  • Tumor necrosis factor-α contributes to below-level neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury

    Xiang Min Peng;Zhi Gang Zhou;Joseph C. Glorioso;David J. Fink

  • Interleukin-10 provides direct trophic support to neurons

    Zhigang Zhou;Xiangmin Peng;Ryan Insolera;David J. Fink

  • Herpes Simplex-Mediated Gene Transfer of Nerve Growth Factor Protects Against Peripheral Neuropathy in Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetes in the Mouse

    James R. Goss;William F. Goins;David Lacomis;Marina Mata

  • Herpes vector-mediated expression of proenkephalin reduces bone cancer pain.

    James R. Goss;Cara F. Harley;Marina Mata;Marina Mata;Mark E. O'Malley

  • Herpes simplex virus vector-mediated expression of Bcl-2 prevents 6-hydroxydopamine-induced degeneration of neurons in the substantia nigra in vivo.

    Masanobu Yamada;Thomas Oligino;Marina Mata;James R. Goss

  • Peripherally delivered glutamic acid decarboxylase gene therapy for spinal cord injury pain

    Joseph C. Glorioso;David J. Fink;Darren Wolfe;David Krisky

  • Continuous δ-Opioid Receptor Activation Reduces Neuronal Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel (NaV1.7) Levels through Activation of Protein Kinase C in Painful Diabetic Neuropathy

    Munmun Chattopadhyay;Marina Mata;David J. Fink

  • Gene transfer of glutamic acid decarboxylase reduces neuropathic pain.

    Shuanglin Hao;Marina Mata;Darren Wolfe;Joseph C. Glorioso

  • Gene transfer to interfere with TNFα signaling in neuropathic pain

    S Hao;M Mata;J C Glorioso;D J Fink

  • Phosphorylation-dependent neurofilament epitopes are reduced at the node of Ranvier

    Marina Mata;Nancy C. Kupina;David J. Fink

Frequent Co-Authors

Joseph C. Glorioso
Joseph C. Glorioso University of Pittsburgh
David Fink
David Fink Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation
William F. Goins
William F. Goins University of Pittsburgh
Pamela E. Knapp
Pamela E. Knapp Virginia Commonwealth University
Elisa Barbarese
Elisa Barbarese University of Connecticut Health Center
Charles ffrench-Constant
Charles ffrench-Constant University of Edinburgh
Andreas Faissner
Andreas Faissner Ruhr University Bochum
Kazuhiro Ikenaka
Kazuhiro Ikenaka National Institutes of Natural Sciences
John L. Beard
John L. Beard Pennsylvania State University
James R. Connor
James R. Connor Pennsylvania State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience can open doors to a wide range of online degrees and career options in related fields. Many students start by considering the cheapest online bachelor's degree in psychology to gain foundational knowledge and keep tuition costs manageable. This pathway is a popular stepping stone for those interested in the mind and brain sciences.

For those looking to pursue careers in social work, counseling, or therapy, researching the easiest online msw program can provide information on accessible options for advanced study. Psychology graduates may also consider further specialization by enrolling in online psyd clinical psychology programs, which focus on clinical practice and psychological assessment.

Another pathway is marriage and family therapy, where students can earn their credentials through mft programs online. These related online degrees offer diverse opportunities to apply neuroscience knowledge across clinical, educational, and research settings, helping to prepare graduates for a wide array of rewarding careers.

Best Scientists Citing Marina Mata

Recently Published Articles