World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
William R. Markesbery

William R. Markesbery

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
144
Citations
94786
World Ranking
176
National Ranking
114

William R. Markesbery publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William R. Markesbery sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 471 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

William R. Markesbery D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William R. Markesbery sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 144 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

William R. Markesbery was affiliated with the University of Kentucky in the United States. Throughout their career, they contributed to the academic community until their passing.

No recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, book publications, fields of study, subfields, main topics of work, or awards have been documented for this researcher in the provided data.

Best Publications

  • A Randomized Trial of Surgery in the Treatment of Single Metastases to the Brain

    Roy A. Patchell;Phillip A. Tibbs;John W. Walsh;Robert J. Dempsey

  • OXIDATIVE STRESS HYPOTHESIS IN ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE

    William R. Markesbery

  • Brain Infarction and the Clinical Expression of Alzheimer Disease: The Nun Study

    David A. Snowdon;Lydia H. Greiner;James A. Mortimer;Kathryn P. Riley

  • Copper, iron and zinc in Alzheimer's disease senile plaques

    M.A Lovell;J.D Robertson;W.J Teesdale;J.L Campbell

  • Postoperative radiotherapy in the treatment of single metastases to the brain: a randomized trial.

    Roy A. Patchell;Phillip A. Tibbs;William F. Regine;Robert J. Dempsey

  • Excess brain protein oxidation and enzyme dysfunction in normal aging and in Alzheimer disease.

    C D Smith;J M Carney;P E Starke-Reed;C N Oliver

  • Incipient Alzheimer's disease: Microarray correlation analyses reveal major transcriptional and tumor suppressor responses

    Eric M. Blalock;James W. Geddes;Kuey Chu Chen;Nada M. Porter

  • Linguistic Ability in Early Life and Cognitive Function and Alzheimer's Disease in Late Life: Findings From the Nun Study

    David A. Snowdon;Susan J. Kemper;James A. Mortimer;Lydia H. Greiner

  • Impaired proteasome function in Alzheimer's disease.

    Jeffrey N. Keller;Keith B. Hanni;William R. Markesbery

  • Oxidative Alterations in Alzheimer's Disease

    William R. Markesbery;John M. Carney

  • A role for 4-hydroxynonenal, an aldehydic product of lipid peroxidation, in disruption of ion homeostasis and neuronal death induced by amyloid β-peptide

    Robert J. Mark;Mark A. Lovell;William R. Markesbery;Koji Uchida

  • Brain Infarction and the Clinical Expression of Alzheimer Disease-Reply

    David A. Snowdon;Lydia H. Greiner;Kathryn P. Riley;William R. Markesbery

  • Four-Hydroxynonenal, a Product of Lipid Peroxidation, is Increased in the Brain in Alzheimer's Disease

    W.R Markesbery;M.A Lovell

  • Elevated thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances and antioxidant enzyme activity in the brain in Alzheimer's disease

    Mark A. Lovell;William D. Ehmann;Steven M. Butler;William R. Markesbery

  • Neurotrophic factors attenuate glutamate-induced accumulation of peroxides, elevation of intracellular Ca2+ concentration, and neurotoxicity and increase antioxidant enzyme activities in hippocampal neurons.

    Mark P. Mattson;Mark A. Lovell;Katsutoshi Furukawa;William R. Markesbery

  • The National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) database: the Uniform Data Set.

    Duane L. Beekly;Erin M. Ramos;William W. Lee;Woodrow D. Deitrich

  • Brain Regional Correspondence Between Alzheimer's Disease Histopathology and Biomarkers of Protein Oxidation

    Unknown

  • Changes in thiol content and expression of glutathione redox system genes in the hippocampus and cerebellum in Alzheimer's disease

    Michael Y. Aksenov;William R. Markesbery

  • Neuropathology and Cognitive Impairment in Alzheimer Disease: A Complex but Coherent Relationship

    Peter T. Nelson;Heiko Braak;William R. Markesbery

  • Neuropathology of nondemented aging: Presumptive evidence for preclinical Alzheimer disease

    Joseph L. Price;Daniel W. McKeel;Virginia D. Buckles;Catherine M. Roe

  • Copper, iron, and zinc imbalances in severely degenerated brain regions in Alzheimer's disease: possible relation to oxidative stress

    M.A Deibel;W.D Ehmann;W.R Markesbery

  • Alzheimer neuropathologic alterations in aged cognitively normal subjects

    D G Davis;F A Schmitt;D R Wekstein;W R Markesbery

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark A. Lovell
Mark A. Lovell University of Kentucky
D. Allan Butterfield
D. Allan Butterfield University of Kentucky
Richard J. Kryscio
Richard J. Kryscio University of Kentucky
Frederick A. Schmitt
Frederick A. Schmitt University of Kentucky
Charles D. Smith
Charles D. Smith University of Kentucky
Jeffrey N. Keller
Jeffrey N. Keller Pennington Biomedical Research Center
Mark P. Mattson
Mark P. Mattson Johns Hopkins University
Kamal Masaki
Kamal Masaki University of Hawaii at Manoa
Thomas J. Montine
Thomas J. Montine Stanford University
Thomas L. Roszman
Thomas L. Roszman University of Kentucky

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in Neuroscience but considering alternatives or complementary study options, there are a variety of online degrees and career paths that cater to different needs. For those seeking a faster route to graduation, 2 year accelerated bachelor degrees online offer flexible schedules, allowing you to earn a quality degree in less time.

Choosing a field with strong earning potential is important. If salary is a top priority, exploring the best degree in the world and the most profitable degrees can help guide your decision based on current employment trends and high-demand industries.

Affordability is also key for many students. You can find fafsa-approved online certificate programs that make advanced education more accessible and budget-friendly. Weigh your interests, goals, and resources to choose a pathway that best fits your professional aspirations in or alongside neuroscience.

Best Scientists Citing William R. Markesbery

Recently Published Articles