World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
83
Citations
28600
World Ranking
1432
National Ranking
719

James A. Joseph publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James A. Joseph sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 263 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

James A. Joseph D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James A. Joseph sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Reversals of Age-Related Declines in Neuronal Signal Transduction, Cognitive, and Motor Behavioral Deficits with Blueberry, Spinach, or Strawberry Dietary Supplementation

    James A. Joseph;Barbara Shukitt-Hale;Natalia A. Denisova;Donna Bielinski

  • Blueberry Supplementation Improves Memory in Older Adults

    Robert Krikorian;Marcelle D Shidler;Tiffany A Nash;Wilhelmina Kalt

  • Anthocyanins in aged blueberry-fed rats are found centrally and may enhance memory.

    Cristina Andres-Lacueva;Barbara Shukitt-Hale;Rachel L. Galli;Olga Jauregui

  • Essential fatty acids and the brain: possible health implications.

    Kuresh A. Youdim;Antonio Martin;James A. Joseph

  • A possible emerging role of phytochemicals in improving age-related neurological dysfunctions: a multiplicity of effects.

    Kuresh A Youdim;James A Joseph

  • Long-Term Dietary Strawberry, Spinach, or Vitamin E Supplementation Retards the Onset of Age-Related Neuronal Signal-Transduction and Cognitive Behavioral Deficits

    J. A. Joseph;B. Shukitt-Hale;N. A. Denisova;R. L. Prior

  • Blueberry Supplementation Enhances Signaling and Prevents Behavioral Deficits in an Alzheimer Disease Model

    J. A. Joseph;G. Arendash;M Gordon;David M. Diamond

  • Flavonoids and the brain: interactions at the blood-brain barrier and their physiological effects on the central nervous system.

    Kuresh A. Youdim;Barbara Shukitt-Hale;James A. Joseph

  • Blueberry polyphenols increase lifespan and thermotolerance in Caenorhabditis elegans

    Mark A. Wilson;Barbara Shukitt-Hale;Wilhelmina Kalt;Donald K. Ingram

  • Concord grape juice supplementation improves memory function in older adults with mild cognitive impairment

    Robert Krikorian;Tiffany A. Nash;Marcelle D. Shidler;Barbara Shukitt-Hale

  • Antioxidant-rich diets improve cerebellar physiology and motor learning in aged rats.

    Paula C Bickford;Thomas Gould;Lori Briederick;Kathy Chadman

  • Modulation of hippocampal plasticity and cognitive behavior by short-term blueberry supplementation in aged rats.

    Gemma Casadesus;Barbara Shukitt-Hale;Heather M. Stellwagen;Xiongwei Zhu

  • Nutrition, brain aging, and neurodegeneration

    James Joseph;Greg Cole;Elizabeth Head;Donald Ingram

  • The beneficial effects of fruit polyphenols on brain aging.

    Francis C. Lau;Barbara Shukitt-Hale;James A. Joseph

  • Inhibitory effects of blueberry extract on the production of inflammatory mediators in lipopolysaccharide-activated BV2 microglia.

    Francis C. Lau;Donna F. Bielinski;James A. Joseph

  • Berry fruit supplementation and the aging brain.

    Barbara Shukitt-Hale;Francis C. Lau;James A. Joseph

  • Age-related Changes in the Nigrostriatum: A Behavioral and Biochemical Analysis

    James A. Joseph;Rick E. Berger;Bernard T. Engel;George S. Roth

  • Fruit Polyphenolics and Brain Aging

    Rachel L. Galli;Rachel L. Galli;Barbara Shukitt-Hale;Kuresh A. Youdim;James A. Joseph

  • Blueberry Supplemented Diet: Effects on Object Recognition Memory and Nuclear Factor-kappa B Levels in Aged Rats

    Pilar Goyarzu;David H. Malin;Francis C. Lau;Giulio Taglialatela

  • Effects of Concord grape juice on cognitive and motor deficits in aging

    Barbara Shukitt-Hale;Amanda Carey;Laura Simon;David A. Mark

  • Reversing the deleterious effects of aging on neuronal communication and behavior: beneficial properties of fruit

    James A Joseph;Barbara Shukitt-Hale;Gemma Casadesus

Frequent Co-Authors

Barbara Shukitt-Hale
Barbara Shukitt-Hale Tufts University
Donald K. Ingram
Donald K. Ingram Louisiana State University
Paula C. Bickford
Paula C. Bickford University of South Florida
Mark A. Smith
Mark A. Smith Case Western Reserve University
George S. Roth
George S. Roth National Institutes of Health
George Perry
George Perry The University of Texas at San Antonio
Edward L. Spangler
Edward L. Spangler National Institutes of Health
Giulio Taglialatela
Giulio Taglialatela The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Gregory J. Brewer
Gregory J. Brewer University of California, Irvine
Caleb E. Finch
Caleb E. Finch University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in neuroscience but exploring a broader range of online degrees, several related fields offer flexible programs to help you achieve your career goals. Psychology is a common pathway, with options available for those seeking the how much does it cost to get a masters in psychology and the most affordable online psychology degree. These degrees can lead to roles in research, behavioral health, or counseling.

For those interested in therapy and counseling, becoming a marriage and family therapist is another rewarding option—explore what’s involved with an lmft degree online. If you’re passionate about making a difference in communities, consider social work. Those looking for accessible programs might start with the easiest social work programs to get into.

These online programs vary in cost, admissions criteria, and specialization, so it’s important to research and compare your options. Related degrees can complement your neuroscience studies or offer alternative routes into brain and behavioral health careers.

Best Scientists Citing James A. Joseph

Recently Published Articles