World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 140 1650 1526 164 156 848 123017

Perry M. Elliott publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Perry M. Elliott between 1962 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Perry M. Elliott published across 64 years, from 1962 to 2025, averaging 15.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 60 publications in 2020. 102 of the 1,017 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1962 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 60. Peak 60 publications in 2020. 1962: 1 publication 1963: 1 publication 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 1 publication 1968: 1 publication 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 1 publication 1972: 4 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 2 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 1 publication 1981: 3 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 3 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 5 publications 1989: 8 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 3 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 12 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 22 publications 1999: 16 publications 2000: 22 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 22 publications 2003: 30 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 18 publications 2006: 17 publications 2007: 28 publications 2008: 28 publications 2009: 22 publications 2010: 49 publications 2011: 34 publications 2012: 45 publications 2013: 37 publications 2014: 38 publications 2015: 38 publications 2016: 28 publications 2017: 30 publications 2018: 59 publications 2019: 46 publications 2020: 60 publications 2021: 46 publications 2022: 31 publications 2023: 45 publications 2024: 51 publications 2025: 51 publications
1962 2025

1,017 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Perry M. Elliott: publications per year, 1962 to 2025
Year Publications
1962 1
1963 1
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 1
1968 1
1969 0
1970 0
1971 1
1972 4
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 1
1977 2
1978 0
1979 1
1980 1
1981 3
1982 3
1983 3
1984 1
1985 3
1986 4
1987 1
1988 5
1989 8
1990 4
1991 1
1992 1
1993 3
1994 2
1995 12
1996 9
1997 8
1998 22
1999 16
2000 22
2001 11
2002 22
2003 30
2004 8
2005 18
2006 17
2007 28
2008 28
2009 22
2010 49
2011 34
2012 45
2013 37
2014 38
2015 38
2016 28
2017 30
2018 59
2019 46
2020 60
2021 46
2022 31
2023 45
2024 51
2025 51
Total 1,017
Download as CSV

Perry M. Elliott publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Perry M. Elliott sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 841–860 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 848 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177 848
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Perry M. Elliott D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Perry M. Elliott sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 140–141 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 140 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134 140
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Perry M. Elliott is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, with significant contributions to molecular biology as well. Their work encompasses a broad area of study within medicine and related fields.

Their research covers key topics such as:

  • Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
  • Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Viral Infections and Immunology Research
  • Cardiac Pacing and Defibrillation Studies
  • Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
  • Congenital Heart Defects Research

Perry M. Elliott's subfields of study include:

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Molecular Biology
  • Epidemiology
  • Genetics
  • Surgery

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Roberto Barriales-Villa
  • Petros Syrris
  • Pablo García-Pavía
  • Iacopo Olivotto
  • Luís R. Lopes

They publish regularly in several venues, including:

  • European Heart Journal
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Circulation
  • JACC Heart Failure
  • European Journal of Heart Failure

Among their recent published papers are:

  • 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies, 2023, European Heart Journal
  • 2020 ESC Guidelines on sports cardiology and exercise in patients with cardiovascular disease, 2020, European Heart Journal
  • Mavacamten for treatment of symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (EXPLORER-HCM): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, 2020, The Lancet
  • European Society of Cardiology: cardiovascular disease statistics 2021, 2021, European Heart Journal
  • 2020 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Executive Summary, 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Best Publications

  • 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC.

    Piotr Ponikowski;Adriaan A. Voors;Stefan D. Anker;Héctor Bueno

  • ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012

    John J.V. McMurray;Stamatis Adamopoulos;Stefan D. Anker;Angelo Auricchio

  • ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2008: the Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2008 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association of the ESC (HFA) and endorsed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM).

    Kenneth Dickstein;Alain Cohen-Solal;Gerasimos Filippatos;John J V McMurray

  • 2014 ESC Guidelines on diagnosis and management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)

    Perry M Elliott;Aris Anastasakis

  • 2013 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy : The Task Force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)

    Michele Brignole;Angelo Auricchio;Gonzalo Baron-Esquivias;Pierre Bordachar

  • ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2008

    John Camm;Veronica Dean;Jose Luis Zamorano;Perry M. Elliott

  • Classification of the cardiomyopathies: a position statement from the european society of cardiology working group on myocardial and pericardial diseases

    Perry Elliott;Bert Andersson;Eloisa Arbustini;Zofia Bilinska

  • Current state of knowledge on aetiology, diagnosis, management, and therapy of myocarditis: a position statement of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases.

    Alida L. P. Caforio;Sabine Pankuweit;Eloisa Arbustini;Cristina Basso

  • 2014 ESC Guidelines on diagnosis and management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

    Perry M. Elliott;Aris Anastasakis;Michael A. Borger;Martin Borggrefe

  • 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: The Task Force for the Management of Patients with Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC).

    Silvia G. Priori;Carina Blomström-Lundqvist

  • Tafamidis Treatment for Patients with Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy

    Mathew S. Maurer;Jeffrey H. Schwartz;Balarama Gundapaneni;Perry M. Elliott

  • 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope.

    Michele Brignole;Angel Moya;Frederik J de Lange;Jean-Claude Deharo

  • 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapyDeveloped by the Task Force on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) With the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)

    Michael Glikson;Jens Cosedis Nielsen;Mads Brix Kronborg;Yoav Michowitz

  • Sudden death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: identification of high risk patients.

    Perry M Elliott;Jan Poloniecki;Shaughan Dickie;Sanjay Sharma

  • A novel clinical risk prediction model for sudden cardiac death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM Risk-SCD)

    Constantinos O'Mahony;Fatima Jichi;Menelaos Pavlou;Lorenzo Monserrat

  • 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope

    Michele Brignole;Angel Moya;Frederik J. de Lange;Jean-Claude Deharo

  • Proposal for a revised definition of dilated cardiomyopathy, hypokinetic non-dilated cardiomyopathy, and its implications for clinical practice : a position statement of the ESC working group on myocardial and pericardial diseases

    Yigal M Pinto;Perry M Elliott;Eloisa Arbustini;Yehuda Adler

  • Equilibrium Contrast Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance for the Measurement of Diffuse Myocardial Fibrosis Preliminary Validation in Humans

    Andrew S. Flett;Martin P. Hayward;Michael T. Ashworth;Michael S. Hansen

  • Toward clinical risk assessment inhypertrophic cardiomyopathy withgadolinium cardiovascular magnetic resonance

    James C.C Moon;William J McKenna;Jane A McCrohon;Perry M Elliott

  • 2015 ESC Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death.

    Silvia G. Priori;Carina Blomström-Lundqvist;Andrea Mazzanti;Nico Blom

Frequent Co-Authors

William J. McKenna
William J. McKenna University College London
James C. Moon
James C. Moon University College London
Sanjay Sharma
Sanjay Sharma St George's, University of London
Derralynn Hughes
Derralynn Hughes Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust
Luigi Tavazzi
Luigi Tavazzi University of Ferrara
Eloisa Arbustini
Eloisa Arbustini Policlinico San Matteo Fondazione
Claudio Rapezzi
Claudio Rapezzi University of Ferrara
Michael P. Frenneaux
Michael P. Frenneaux University of East Anglia
Aleš Linhart
Aleš Linhart Charles University
Dudley J. Pennell
Dudley J. Pennell National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Medicine opens doors to a wide variety of online degrees and alternative pathways in healthcare. Many students choose to start with foundational programs such as an online bachelor's in nutrition, which provides a strong background in health sciences and can lead to unique specializations.

For those interested in healthcare administration, enrolling in top online mha programs that are cahme accredited offers the credibility and flexibility needed to advance into leadership positions. Nurses looking to further their education often consider accredited rn to bsn programs that do not require clinical hours, making it easier for working professionals to upskill.

For advanced practice, the demand for nurse leaders is growing. The fastest dnp online program options help experienced nurses gain doctoral-level expertise efficiently. These online programs are ideal for those balancing work, study, and personal commitments, enabling diverse career progressions in healthcare beyond traditional medical degrees.

Best Scientists Citing Perry M. Elliott

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles