World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
94
Citations
43403
World Ranking
10302
National Ranking
367

Eloisa Arbustini publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eloisa Arbustini sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 540 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Eloisa Arbustini D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eloisa Arbustini sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eloisa Arbustini is affiliated with Policlinico San Matteo Fondazione in Italy. Their research spans the broad field of Medicine, with a focus on specialized subfields including Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology, and Genetics.

The scientist's work covers multiple key topics such as Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies, Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics, Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise, Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics, BRCA gene mutations in cancer, COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies, and Long-Term Effects of COVID-19.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Eloisa Arbustini include Cristina Basso, Gaetano Maria De Ferrari, Eric Bates, Jeffrey Schussler, and Robert Stoler. These collaborations have contributed substantially to their research output.

Arbustini's publications have appeared predominantly in venues such as The American Journal of Cardiology, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, European Heart Journal Supplements, European Heart Journal, and Nature Reviews Cardiology.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Eloisa Arbustini include:

  • 2022 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension, 2022, European Heart Journal
  • 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies, 2023, European Heart Journal
  • Myocardial localization of coronavirus in COVID-19 cardiogenic shock, 2020, European Journal of Heart Failure
  • Optical coherence tomography in coronary atherosclerosis assessment and intervention, 2022, Nature Reviews Cardiology
  • Cardiac Involvement in Fabry Disease, 2021, Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Best Publications

  • Classification of the cardiomyopathies: a position statement from the european society of cardiology working group on myocardial and pericardial diseases

    Perry Elliott;Bert Andersson;Eloisa Arbustini;Zofia Bilinska

  • Current state of knowledge on aetiology, diagnosis, management, and therapy of myocarditis: a position statement of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases.

    Alida L. P. Caforio;Sabine Pankuweit;Eloisa Arbustini;Cristina Basso

  • Cardiovascular pre-participation screening of young competitive athletes for prevention of sudden death: proposal for a common European protocol Consensus Statement of the Study Group of Sport Cardiology of the Working Group of Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology and the Working Group of Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology

    Domenico Corrado;Antonio Pelliccia;Hans Halvor Bjørnstad;Luc Vanhees

  • Independent and additive prognostic value of right ventricular systolic function and pulmonary artery pressure in patients with chronic heart failure

    Stefano Ghio;Antonello Gavazzi;Carlo Campana;Corinna Inserra

  • Recommendations for competitive sports participation in athletes with cardiovascular disease : a consensus document from the study group of sports cardiology of the working group of cardiac rehabilitation and exercise physiology and the working group of myocardial and pericardial diseases of the european society of cardiology

    Antonio Pelliccia;Robert Fagard;Hans Halvor Bjørnstad;Aris Anastassakis

  • Expert review document on methodology, terminology, and clinical applications of optical coherence tomography: Physical principles, methodology of image acquisition, and clinical application for assessment of coronary arteries and atherosclerosis

    Francesco Prati;Evelyn Regar;Gary S. Mintz;Eloisa Arbustini

  • Proposal for a revised definition of dilated cardiomyopathy, hypokinetic non-dilated cardiomyopathy, and its implications for clinical practice : a position statement of the ESC working group on myocardial and pericardial diseases

    Yigal M Pinto;Perry M Elliott;Eloisa Arbustini;Yehuda Adler

  • Myocardial localization of coronavirus in COVID-19 cardiogenic shock.

    Guido Tavazzi;Carlo Pellegrini;Marco Maurelli;Mirko Belliato

  • Apoptosis in heart failure: Release of cytochrome c from mitochondria and activation of caspase-3 in human cardiomyopathy

    Jagat Narula;Pramod Pandey;Eloisa Arbustini;Nezam Haider

  • Atlas of the clinical genetics of human dilated cardiomyopathy

    Jan Haas;Karen S. Frese;Barbara Peil;Wanda Kloos

  • Effect of mutation type and location on clinical outcome in 1,013 probands with marfan syndrome or related phenotypes and FBN1 mutations : An international study

    L. Faivre;G. Collod-Beroud;G. Collod-Beroud;B.L. Loeys;A. Child

  • Genetic counselling and testing in cardiomyopathies: a position statement of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases

    Philippe Charron;Michael Arad;Michael Arad;Eloisa Arbustini;Cristina Basso

  • Risk Factors for Malignant Ventricular Arrhythmias in Lamin A/C Mutation Carriers A European Cohort Study

    Ingrid A.W. van Rijsingen;Eloisa Arbustini;Perry M. Elliott;Jens Mogensen

  • Autosomal dominant dilated cardiomyopathy with atrioventricular block: a lamin A/C defect-related disease.

    Eloisa Arbustini;Andrea Pilotto;Alessandra Repetto;Maurizia Grasso

  • Diagnostic work-up in cardiomyopathies: bridging the gap between clinical phenotypes and final diagnosis. A position statement from the ESC Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases

    Claudio Rapezzi;Eloisa Arbustini;Alida L P Caforio;Philippe Charron

  • Intraplaque haemorrhages as the trigger of plaque vulnerability

    Jean-Baptiste Michel;Renu Virmani;Eloïsa Arbustini;Gerard Pasterkamp

  • Long-term outcome and risk stratification in dilated cardiolaminopathies.

    Michele Pasotti;Catherine Klersy;Andrea Pilotto;Nicola Marziliano

  • A genome-wide association study identifies two loci associated with heart failure due to dilated cardiomyopathy

    Eric Villard;Claire Perret;Françoise Gary;Carole Proust

  • The MOGE(S) classification for a phenotype-genotype nomenclature of cardiomyopathy: endorsed by the World Heart Federation.

    Eloisa Arbustini;Navneet Narula;G. William Dec;K. Srinath Reddy

  • Plaque erosion is a major substrate for coronary thrombosis in acute myocardial infarction

    E. Arbustini;A. Burke;B. dal Bello;P. Morbini

Frequent Co-Authors

Luigi Tavazzi
Luigi Tavazzi University of Ferrara
Jagat Narula
Jagat Narula Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Perry M. Elliott
Perry M. Elliott University College London
Giampaolo Merlini
Giampaolo Merlini University of Pavia
Claudio Rapezzi
Claudio Rapezzi University of Ferrara
Catherine Klersy
Catherine Klersy University of Pavia
Michel Komajda
Michel Komajda Université Paris Cité
Bart Loeys
Bart Loeys University of Antwerp
Benjamin Meder
Benjamin Meder Heidelberg University
Catherine Boileau
Catherine Boileau Université Paris Cité

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine opens up diverse online study options that can accelerate your healthcare career. For registered nurses aiming to advance, rn to bsn online programs offer an affordable, flexible path to earning a bachelor’s degree. These programs are ideal for those looking to expand clinical opportunities and boost earning potential.

If you hold a non-nursing bachelor’s degree, fast-track options such as online direct entry msn programs for non-nurses can help you quickly transition into advanced nursing roles, with many programs designed for those with no prior nursing credentials.

Those just starting out can consider online adn programs for non nurses, which provide a direct and accessible path to begin practicing as a registered nurse.

For students interested in healthcare administration or working remotely, explore medical billing and coding online schools that accept financial aid. These programs offer a practical alternative to clinical careers, with strong job prospects and financial support options.

Best Scientists Citing Eloisa Arbustini

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles