World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Wayne S. Pitchford

Wayne S. Pitchford

D-Index & Metrics

Animal Science and Veterinary

D-Index
30
Citations
4172
World Ranking
2405
National Ranking
131

Wayne S. Pitchford publication distribution in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wayne S. Pitchford sits on this spectrum.

29–33 publications: 1 scientists 34–38 publications: 6 scientists 39–43 publications: 17 scientists 44–48 publications: 23 scientists 49–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–58 publications: 44 scientists 59–63 publications: 66 scientists 64–68 publications: 75 scientists 69–73 publications: 71 scientists 74–78 publications: 85 scientists 79–83 publications: 108 scientists 84–88 publications: 105 scientists 89–93 publications: 84 scientists 94–98 publications: 103 scientists 99–103 publications: 97 scientists 104–108 publications: 95 scientists 109–113 publications: 89 scientists 114–118 publications: 88 scientists 119–123 publications: 109 scientists 124–128 publications: 93 scientists 129–133 publications: 89 scientists 134–138 publications: 95 scientists 139–143 publications: 92 scientists 144–148 publications: 80 scientists 149–153 publications: 75 scientists 154–158 publications: 74 scientists 159–163 publications: 67 scientists 164–168 publications: 53 scientists 169–173 publications: 62 scientists 174–178 publications: 63 scientists 179–183 publications: 50 scientists 184–188 publications: 55 scientists 189–193 publications: 50 scientists 194–198 publications: 27 scientists 199–203 publications: 44 scientists 204–208 publications: 31 scientists 209–213 publications: 28 scientists 214–218 publications: 38 scientists 219–223 publications: 33 scientists 224–228 publications: 36 scientists 229–233 publications: 29 scientists 234–238 publications: 35 scientists 239–243 publications: 23 scientists 244–248 publications: 24 scientists 249–253 publications: 29 scientists 254–258 publications: 28 scientists 259–263 publications: 21 scientists 264–268 publications: 25 scientists 269–273 publications: 11 scientists 274–278 publications: 18 scientists 279–283 publications: 13 scientists 284–288 publications: 18 scientists 289–293 publications: 10 scientists 294–298 publications: 12 scientists 299–303 publications: 11 scientists 304–308 publications: 15 scientists 309–313 publications: 14 scientists 314–318 publications: 14 scientists 319–323 publications: 8 scientists 324–328 publications: 8 scientists 329–333 publications: 13 scientists 334–338 publications: 14 scientists 339–343 publications: 13 scientists 344–348 publications: 10 scientists 349–353 publications: 11 scientists 354–358 publications: 5 scientists 359–363 publications: 8 scientists 364–368 publications: 8 scientists 369–373 publications: 6 scientists 374–378 publications: 7 scientists 379–383 publications: 8 scientists 384–388 publications: 3 scientists 389–393 publications: 4 scientists 394–398 publications: 5 scientists 399–403 publications: 8 scientists 404–408 publications: 5 scientists 409–413 publications: 4 scientists 414–418 publications: 3 scientists 419–423 publications: 8 scientists 424–428 publications: 5 scientists 429–433 publications: 3 scientists 434–438 publications: 5 scientists 439–441 publications: 5 scientists 442+ publications: 99 scientists
29 publications 442+

This scientist: 187 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more.

Wayne S. Pitchford D-index placement in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wayne S. Pitchford sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 5 scientists 21 D-Index: 22 scientists 22 D-Index: 31 scientists 23 D-Index: 44 scientists 24 D-Index: 53 scientists 25 D-Index: 66 scientists 26 D-Index: 80 scientists 27 D-Index: 101 scientists 28 D-Index: 106 scientists 29 D-Index: 116 scientists 30 D-Index: 154 scientists 31 D-Index: 158 scientists 32 D-Index: 143 scientists 33 D-Index: 137 scientists 34 D-Index: 126 scientists 35 D-Index: 134 scientists 36 D-Index: 112 scientists 37 D-Index: 115 scientists 38 D-Index: 105 scientists 39 D-Index: 111 scientists 40 D-Index: 107 scientists 41 D-Index: 87 scientists 42 D-Index: 74 scientists 43 D-Index: 62 scientists 44 D-Index: 61 scientists 45 D-Index: 41 scientists 46 D-Index: 51 scientists 47 D-Index: 43 scientists 48 D-Index: 28 scientists 49 D-Index: 47 scientists 50 D-Index: 40 scientists 51 D-Index: 34 scientists 52 D-Index: 33 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 16 scientists 55 D-Index: 32 scientists 56 D-Index: 21 scientists 57 D-Index: 18 scientists 58 D-Index: 28 scientists 59 D-Index: 33 scientists 60 D-Index: 17 scientists 61 D-Index: 21 scientists 62 D-Index: 18 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 9 scientists 65 D-Index: 20 scientists 66 D-Index: 11 scientists 67 D-Index: 16 scientists 68 D-Index: 12 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 13 scientists 71 D-Index: 15 scientists 72 D-Index: 11 scientists 73 D-Index: 11 scientists 74 D-Index: 14 scientists 75 D-Index: 5 scientists 76 D-Index: 6 scientists 77+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 77+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more.

Overview

Wayne S. Pitchford is affiliated with the University of Adelaide in Australia and has contributed extensively to the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology as well as Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Their research focuses on genetics, agronomy and crop science, and animal science and zoology, with particular emphasis on genetics in livestock and plants.

The main research topics explored by Pitchford include genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock, genetic mapping and diversity in plants and animals, reproductive physiology in livestock, ruminant nutrition and digestive physiology, meat and animal product quality, genomics and chromatin dynamics, and genetics and plant breeding.

Pitchford has frequently published in several scientific journals, notable venues being Animal Production Science, Meat Science, Agriculture, Genomics, and Animal Genetics. The distribution of publications shows a concentration in Animal Production Science, with twelve articles published there, followed by three in Meat Science.

Frequent collaborators of Pitchford include M. L. Hebart, R. A. McEwin, Helena Oakey, M. L. Facy, and J. M. Pitchford, reflecting ongoing collaborative work in related research areas.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Pitchford include:

  • Cross-species enhancer prediction using machine learning, 2022, Genomics
  • Changing Australia's trading language has enhanced the implementation of objective carcase measurement technologies, 2024, Meat Science
  • Selection strategies for beef cow size and condition, 2021, Animal Production Science
  • Comparison of Methods to Select Candidates for High-Density Genotyping; Practical Observations in a Cattle Breeding Program, 2022, Agriculture
  • Opportunity to improve livestock traits using 3D genomics, 2021, Animal Genetics

Best Publications

  • Optimum postweaning test for measurement of growth rate, feed intake, and feed efficiency in British breed cattle

    J A Archer;P F Arthur;R M Herd;P F Parnell

  • Joint modeling of additive and non-additive genetic line effects in single field trials

    Helena Oakey;Arūnas Verbyla;Wayne Pitchford;Brian Cullis

  • A comparison of the fatty acid composition of triacylglycerols in adipose tissue from Limousin and Jersey cattle

    A. E. O. Malau-Aduli;B. D. Siebert;C. D. K. Bottema;W. S. Pitchford

  • Fatty acid synthase effects on bovine adipose fat and milk fat

    Chris A. Morris;Neil G. Cullen;Belinda C. Glass;Dianne L. Hyndman

  • Genetic variation in fatness and fatty acid composition of crossbred cattle

    W S Pitchford;M P B Deland;B D Siebert;A E O Malau-Aduli

  • Breed comparison of the fatty acid composition of muscle phospholipids in Jersey and Limousin cattle.

    Aduli E. O. Malau-Aduli;Brian D. Siebert;Cynthia D. K. Bottema;Wayne S. Pitchford

  • Genotypic effects of calpain 1 and calpastatin on the tenderness of cooked M. longissimus dorsi steaks from Jersey x Limousin, Angus and Hereford-cross cattle.

    C. A. Morris;N. G. Cullen;S. M. Hickey;P. M. Dobbie

  • Effects of the myostatin F94L substitution on beef traits

    A. K. Esmailizadeh;C. D. K. Bottema;G. S. Sellick;A. P. Verbyla

  • Measures of behavioural reactivity and their relationships with production traits in sheep: A review

    Cathy L. Dodd;Wayne S. Pitchford;Janelle E. Hocking Edwards;Susan J. Hazel

  • Joint modeling of additive and non-additive (genetic line) effects in multi-environment trials.

    Helena Oakey;Arūnas P. Verbyla;Brian R. Cullis;Xianming Wei

  • Effect of myostatin F94L on carcass yield in cattle

    G. S. Sellick;W. S. Pitchford;C. A. Morris;N. G. Cullen

  • Genetic variation in the β, β‐carotene‐9′, 10′‐dioxygenase gene and association with fat colour in bovine adipose tissue and milk

    R. Tian;W. S. Pitchford;C. A. Morris;N. G. Cullen

  • Genetic improvement of feed efficiency of beef cattle: what lessons can be learnt from other species?

    W. S. Pitchford

  • Identification of risk factors for sub-optimal housing conditions in Australian piggeries: Part 3. Environmental parameters.

    T. M. Banhazi;J. Seedorf;D. L. Rutley;W. S. Pitchford

  • Vitamin A and marbling attributes: Intramuscular fat hyperplasia effects in cattle

    Z.A. Kruk;M.J. Bottema;L. Reyes-Veliz;R.E.A. Forder

  • Breed differences in the fatty acid composition of subcutaneous and intramuscular lipid of early and late maturing, grain-finished cattle

    BD Siebert;MP Deland;WS Pitchford

  • Identification of risk factors for sub-optimal housing conditions in Australian piggeries: Part 4. Emission factors and study recommendations

    T. M. Banhazi;D. L. Rutley;W. S. Pitchford

  • Effect of low vitamin A status on fat deposition and fatty acid desaturation in beef cattle.

    B. D. Siebert;Z. A. Kruk;J. Davis;W. S. Pitchford

  • Differences in Δ9 desaturase activity between jersey-and limousin-sired cattle

    B. D. Siebert;W. S. Pitchford;Z. A. Kruk;H. Kuchel

  • Genetic and phenotypic relationships between food intake, growth, efficiency and body composition of mice post weaning and at maturity

    J. A. Archer;W. S. Pitchford;T. E. Hughes;P. F. Parnell

  • Breed variation and genetic parameters for growth and body development in diverse beef cattle genotypes.

    R. A. Afolayan;W. S. Pitchford;M. P. B. Deland;W. A. McKiernan

  • Selection for residual feed intake affects appetite and body composition rather than energetic efficiency

    W. S. Pitchford;W. S. Pitchford;C. D. K. Bottema;C. D. K. Bottema;R. M. Herd;R. M. Herd;V. H. Oddy;V. H. Oddy

  • Effects of vitamin A on growth performance and carcass quality in steers

    Z.A. Kruk;Z.A. Kruk;C.D.K. Bottema;C.D.K. Bottema;J.J. Davis;B.D. Siebert;B.D. Siebert

Frequent Co-Authors

Norah M. E. Fogarty
Norah M. E. Fogarty King's College London
J. A. Archer
J. A. Archer AgResearch
Haydn Kuchel
Haydn Kuchel Australian Grain Technologies
Ali Esmailizadeh
Ali Esmailizadeh Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman
Susan J. Hazel
Susan J. Hazel University of Adelaide
John Mitchell Thompson
John Mitchell Thompson University of New England
Harris A. Lewin
Harris A. Lewin University of California, Davis
Gary L. Bennett
Gary L. Bennett Agricultural Research Service
Eduardo Casas
Eduardo Casas Agricultural Research Service
William Barendse
William Barendse Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Animal Science and Veterinary studies, there are several related online degrees that can complement or expand your career options. Psychology and counseling fields, for example, often intersect with animal behavior and welfare, making programs like nasp approved online programs a useful avenue for those looking to support animal-assisted therapy or behavioral research.

Further educational opportunities include advanced degrees in mental health, such as online psyd programs accredited by the APA, which can provide strong clinical skills relevant to veterinary behavioral medicine and holistic animal care.

Career pathways also extend into specialized counseling fields. For those interested in addressing human-animal interactions and community health, an addiction counseling degree online can open doors to support both human clients and their pets in recovery processes.

Additionally, a marriage and family masters programs may appeal to professionals seeking to incorporate family dynamics into animal welfare education and therapy, broadening the impact on both human and animal well-being.

Best Scientists Citing Wayne S. Pitchford

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles