World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
36
Citations
10727
World Ranking
8894
National Ranking
744

Patrick Berg publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick Berg sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 64 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Patrick Berg D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick Berg sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Patrick Berg is affiliated with the University of Konstanz in Germany and focuses their research within the field of Neuroscience. Their work spans several subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, Genetics, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Pharmacy, and Psychiatry and Mental Health.

Their research topics cover diverse aspects of brain function, neurological disorders, and behavioral studies. Key topics include:

  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Infant Health and Development
  • Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Blind Source Separation Techniques

Patrick Berg has contributed to several peer-reviewed publications in recognized scientific journals. Recent papers include:

  • Using mobile eye tracking to study dogs' understanding of human referential communication, 2025, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • Relative Source Power: A novel method for localizing epileptiform EEG discharges, 2021, Clinical Neurophysiology
  • EEG-fMRI: Ballistocardiogram Artifact Reduction by Surrogate Method for Improved Source Localization, 2022, Frontiers in Neuroscience

Their frequent coauthors are:

  • Michael Scherg
  • Jae-Hyun Cho
  • Harald Bornfleth
  • Christoph J. Völter
  • Karoline Gerwisch

The venues where Patrick Berg often publishes include:

  • Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: Recording standards and publication criteria

    Terence W. Picton;S. Bentin;P. Berg;E. Donchin

  • Artifact correction of the ongoing EEG using spatial filters based on artifact and brain signal topographies.

    Nicole Ille;Patrick Berg;Michael Scherg

  • A multiple source approach to the correction of eye artifacts.

    Patrick Berg;Michael Scherg

  • BESA source coherence: a new method to study cortical oscillatory coupling.

    Karsten Hoechstetter;Harald Bornfleth;Dieter Weckesser;Nicole Ille

  • Ocular artifacts in EEG and event-related potentials. I: Scalp topography.

    Otavio G. Lins;Terence W. Picton;Patrick Berg;Michael Scherg

  • Optimizing principal components analysis of event-related potentials: matrix type, factor loading weighting, extraction, and rotations.

    Joseph Dien;Joseph Dien;Daniel J. Beal;Daniel J. Beal;Daniel J. Beal;Patrick Berg

  • A fast method for forward computation of multiple-shell spherical head models

    Patrick Berg;Michael Scherg

  • Advanced tools for digital EEG review: virtual source montages, whole-head mapping, correlation, and phase analysis.

    Michael Scherg;Nicole Ille;Harald Bornfleth;Patrick Berg

  • Use of prior knowledge in brain electromagnetic source analysis.

    Michael Scherg;Michael Scherg;Patrick Berg

  • Dipole models of eye movements and blinks

    Patrick Berg;Michael Scherg

  • Ocular artifacts in recording EEGs and event-related potentials II: Source dipoles and source components

    Otavio G. Lins;Terence W. Picton;Patrick Berg;Michael Scherg

  • The correction of ocular artifacts: a topographic perspective

    Terence W Picton;Patricia van Roon;Maria L Armilio;Patrick Berg

  • Dipole modelling of eye activity and its application to the removal of eye artefacts from the EEG and MEG.

    P Berg;M Scherg

  • Multiple source analysis of interictal spikes: goals, requirements, and clinical value.

    Michael Scherg;Thomas Bast;Patrick Berg

  • Physical aspects of the EEG in schizophrenics

    Thomas Elbert;Werner Lutzenberger;Brigitte Rockstroh;Patrick Berg

  • Mapping EEG-potentials on the surface of the brain: A strategy for uncovering cortical sources

    Markus Junghöfer;Thomas Elbert;Paul Leiderer;Patrick Berg

  • Source analysis of median nerve and finger stimulated somatosensory evoked potentials: multichannel simultaneous recording of electric and magnetic fields combined with 3D-MR tomography.

    Helmut Buchner;Manfred Fuchs;Hans Aloys Wischmann;Olaf Dössel

  • Interaction of tactile input in the human primary and secondary somatosensory cortex--a magnetoencephalographic study.

    Karsten Hoechstetter;André Rupp;Andrej Stančák;Hans-Michael Meinck

  • Study of the human auditory cortices using a whole-head magnetometer : left vs. right hemisphere and ipsilateral vs. contralateral stimulation

    Christo Pantev;Bernhard Ross;Patrick Berg;Thomas Elbert

  • Impaired modulation of the saccadic contingent negative variation preceding antisaccades in schizophrenia

    Christoph Klein;Theda Heinks;Burghard Andresen;Patrick Berg

  • Abnormal auditory mismatch response in tinnitus sufferers with high-frequency hearing loss is associated with subjective distress level

    Nathan Weisz;Sandra Voss;Patrick Berg;Thomas Elbert

Frequent Co-Authors

Brigitte Rockstroh
Brigitte Rockstroh University of Konstanz
Michael Scherg
Michael Scherg Heidelberg University
Thomas Elbert
Thomas Elbert University of Konstanz
Christoph Klein
Christoph Klein University of Freiburg
Terence W. Picton
Terence W. Picton University of Toronto
Michael Wagner
Michael Wagner TU Dresden
André Rupp
André Rupp Heidelberg University
Christoph Stippich
Christoph Stippich University of Zurich
Brett A. Clementz
Brett A. Clementz University of Georgia
Olaf Hauk
Olaf Hauk MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Patrick Berg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles