World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

W. Gregory Hundley publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where W. Gregory Hundley sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

W. Gregory Hundley D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where W. Gregory Hundley sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

W. Gregory Hundley is affiliated with Virginia Commonwealth University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a focused subfield emphasis on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Oncology, Complementary and Alternative Medicine, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics, including:

  • Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Cancer survivorship and care
  • Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
  • Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention

Hundley has contributed to multiple publications in several well-known venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Circulation
  • Cardio-Oncology
  • JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Hypertension

Some of the more recent published papers include:

  • Assessment of Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring to Guide Statin Therapy Allocation According to Risk-Enhancing Factors, 2021, JAMA Cardiology
  • A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Resistance Training Added to Caloric Restriction Plus Aerobic Exercise Training in Obese Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction, 2022, Circulation Heart Failure
  • Effect of Intensive Blood Pressure Control on Aortic Stiffness in the SPRINT-HEART, 2021, Hypertension
  • Effects of Exercise and Weight Loss on Proximal Aortic Stiffness in Older Adults With Obesity, 2021, Circulation
  • Cardiovascular Assessment Tool for Breast Cancer Survivors and Oncology Providers: Usability Study, 2020, JMIR Cancer

Hundley frequently collaborates with several coauthors. Notable coauthors include:

  • Ralph B. D'Agostino
  • Jennifer H. Jordan
  • Amy C. Ladd
  • Nathaniel S. O'Connell
  • Kathryn E. Weaver

Best Publications

  • ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 Expert Consensus Document on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents

    W. Gregory Hundley;David A. Bluemke;J. Paul Finn;Scott D. Flamm

  • Pathophysiological characterization of isolated diastolic heart failure in comparison to systolic heart failure.

    Dalane W. Kitzman;William C. Little;Peter H. Brubaker;Roger T. Anderson

  • Heart Failure Prevalence, Incidence, and Mortality in the Elderly With Diabetes

    Alain G. Bertoni;W. Gregory Hundley;Mark W. Massing;Denise E. Bonds

  • Expert Consensus DocumentACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 Expert Consensus Document on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents

    W. Gregory Hundley;David A. Bluemke;J. Paul Finn;Scott D. Flamm

  • Role of noninvasive testing in the clinical evaluation of women with suspected coronary artery disease: Consensus statement from the Cardiac Imaging Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, American Heart Association.

    Jennifer H. Mieres;Leslee J. Shaw;Andrew Arai;Matthew J. Budoff

  • Noninvasive Coronary Artery Imaging Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and the Councils on Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease in the Young

    David A. Bluemke;Stephan Achenbach;Matthew Budoff;Thomas C. Gerber

  • Cardiovascular function in multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis: normal values by age, sex, and ethnicity.

    Shunsuke Natori;Shenghan Lai;J Paul Finn;Antoinette S Gomes

  • Cardiovascular Event Prediction by Machine Learning: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.

    Bharath Ambale-Venkatesh;Xiaoying Yang;Colin O. Wu;Kiang Liu

  • Cardiac cycle-dependent changes in aortic area and distensibility are reduced in older patients with isolated diastolic heart failure and correlate with exercise intolerance☆

    W.Gregory Hundley;Dalane W Kitzman;Timothy M Morgan;Craig A Hamilton

  • Effect of Endurance Exercise Training on Endothelial function and Arterial Stiffness in Older Patients with Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Randomized, Controlled, Single-Blind Trial

    Dalane W. Kitzman;Peter H. Brubaker;David M. Herrington;Timothy M. Morgan

  • The Effect of Alagebrium Chloride (ALT-711), a Novel Glucose Cross-Link Breaker, in the Treatment of Elderly Patients With Diastolic Heart Failure

    William C. Little;Michael R. Zile;Dalane W. Kitzman;W. Gregory Hundley

  • Low to Moderate Dose Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy Is Associated With Early Noninvasive Imaging Evidence of Subclinical Cardiovascular Disease

    Brandon C. Drafts;Katie M. Twomley;Ralph D'Agostino;Julia Lawrence

  • Utility of Fast Cine Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Display for the Detection of Myocardial Ischemia in Patients Not Well Suited for Second Harmonic Stress Echocardiography

    W. Gregory Hundley;Craig A. Hamilton;Mark S. Thomas;David M. Herrington

  • Traditional Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Relation to Left Ventricular Mass, Volume, and Systolic Function by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: The Multiethnic Study of Atherosclerosis

    Susan R. Heckbert;Wendy Post;Gregory D.N. Pearson;Donna K. Arnett

  • ACCF/AHA clinical competence statement on cardiac imaging with computed tomography and magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical Competence and Training.

    Matthew J. Budoff;Mylan C. Cohen;Mario J. Garcia;John Mc B. Hodgson

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging Determination of Cardiac Prognosis

    W. Gregory Hundley;Timothy M. Morgan;Christina M. Neagle;Craig A. Hamilton

  • Evaluation of Age-Related Interstitial Myocardial Fibrosis With Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Contrast-Enhanced T1 Mapping: MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis)

    Chia Ying Liu;Yuan Chang Liu;Colin Wu;Anderson Armstrong

  • Administration of an intravenous perfluorocarbon contrast agent improves echocardiographic determination of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: comparison with cine magnetic resonance imaging.

    W.Gregory Hundley;W.Gregory Hundley;Ali M Kizilbash;Imran Afridi;Fatima Franco

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of the Severity of Mitral Regurgitation Comparison With Invasive Techniques

    W. G. Hundley;H. F. Li;J. E. Willard;C. Landau

  • ACCF/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2013 Multimodality Appropriate Use Criteria for the Detection and Risk Assessment of Stable Ischemic Heart Disease

    Michael J. Wolk;Steven R. Bailey;John U. Doherty;Pamela S. Douglas

Frequent Co-Authors

David A. Bluemke
David A. Bluemke University of Wisconsin–Madison
Joao A.C. Lima
Joao A.C. Lima Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Dalane W. Kitzman
Dalane W. Kitzman Wake Forest University
Ralph B. D'Agostino
Ralph B. D'Agostino Wake Forest University
David M. Herrington
David M. Herrington Wake Forest University
William C. Little
William C. Little University of Mississippi Medical Center
Ronald M Peshock
Ronald M Peshock The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Christopher M. Kramer
Christopher M. Kramer University of Virginia Health System
Matthew J. Budoff
Matthew J. Budoff UCLA Medical Center
Michael Jerosch-Herold
Michael Jerosch-Herold Brigham and Women's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring medical professionals have more flexible education options than ever before. If you’re considering careers outside of traditional MD programs, numerous accredited online degrees can help launch or advance your journey in healthcare.

Those interested in healthcare management can explore cahme-accredited online mha programs, which offer advanced training in healthcare administration from the comfort of home. Registered Nurses looking to complete a bachelor’s degree may prefer online rn to bsn programs without clinicals, providing academic advancement with more flexibility and less hands-on requirement.

For nurses aiming for the pinnacle of clinical practice, Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) degrees are now more convenient, with shortest dnp program online options that can be completed in less time. Additionally, the shortest dnp program can help experienced nurses gain leadership roles and increase earning potential without a lengthy commitment.

Online healthcare degrees can open doors across administration, advanced practice, and leadership—broadening the possibilities for your medical career in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing W. Gregory Hundley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles