World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
80
Citations
21129
World Ranking
17216
National Ranking
8627

Ronald M Peshock publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronald M Peshock sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 278 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Ronald M Peshock D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronald M Peshock sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ronald M Peshock is affiliated with The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in the United States. Their research spans a broad range of topics primarily within medicine, with extensive contributions to radiology, cardiology, and health informatics.

Their publication record includes significant work in the areas of cardiac imaging, radiology practices, artificial intelligence in healthcare, muscle physiology, cardiomyopathy studies, cardiovascular risk factors, and venous thromboembolism diagnosis and management.

  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Radiology practices and education
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management

They have co-authored with several frequent collaborators, including Mark H. Drazner, Fernando Uliana Kay, Suhny Abbara, James A. de Lemos, and Colby Ayers, indicating an active engagement in collaborative research efforts.

  • Mark H. Drazner
  • Fernando Uliana Kay
  • Suhny Abbara
  • James A. de Lemos
  • Colby Ayers

Ronald M Peshock's work is published in a variety of notable journals, with a focus on cardiovascular and radiological research.

  • Circulation (7 publications)
  • Radiology (3 publications)
  • American Journal of Roentgenology (2 publications)
  • Journal of the American College of Radiology (2 publications)
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (2 publications)

Recent papers demonstrate an intersection of imaging technology, artificial intelligence, and cardiovascular medicine. These include:

  • Active Reprioritization of the Reading Worklist Using Artificial Intelligence Has a Beneficial Effect on the Turnaround Time for Interpretation of Head CT with Intracranial Hemorrhage, 2020, Radiology Artificial Intelligence
  • Prevalence of pectus excavatum in an adult population-based cohort estimated from radiographic indices of chest wall shape, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • Supranormal Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction, Stroke Volume, and Cardiovascular Risk, 2022, JACC Heart Failure
  • Radiologist Worklist Reprioritization Using Artificial Intelligence: Impact on Report Turnaround Times for CTPA Examinations Positive for Acute Pulmonary Embolism, 2023, American Journal of Roentgenology
  • Detection of Incidental Pulmonary Embolism on Conventional Contrast-Enhanced Chest CT: Comparison of an Artificial Intelligence Algorithm and Clinical Reports, 2022, American Journal of Roentgenology

Their research contributions emphasize the use of artificial intelligence to improve imaging workflow efficiency and diagnostic accuracy, alongside investigations into cardiovascular function and structural abnormalities. The interdisciplinary nature of their work reflects a blend of internal medicine, molecular biology, and imaging sciences to address complex clinical problems.

Best Publications

  • Relationships of generalized and regional adiposity to insulin sensitivity in men.

    N. Abate;Abhimanyu Garg;Ronald M Peshock;J. Stray-Gundersen

  • Cardiac Failure in Transgenic Mice With Myocardial Expression of Tumor Necrosis Factor-α

    Debora Bryant;Lisa Becker;James A Richardson;John Shelton

  • The Dallas Heart Study: a population-based probability sample for the multidisciplinary study of ethnic differences in cardiovascular health.

    Ronald G. Victor;Robert W Haley;Duwayne L Willett;Ronald M Peshock

  • Cardiac atrophy after bed rest and spaceflight.

    Merja A. Perhonen;Fatima Franco;Lynda D. Lane;Jay C. Buckey

  • Human αB-Crystallin Mutation Causes Oxido-Reductive Stress and Protein Aggregation Cardiomyopathy in Mice

    Namakkal S. Rajasekaran;Patrice Connell;Elisabeth S. Christians;Liang Jun Yan

  • Estimation of adipose tissue mass by magnetic resonance imaging: validation against dissection in human cadavers.

    Nicola Abate;Dennis Burns;Ronald M. Peshock;Abhimanyu Garg

  • Acute effects of exercise on MR imaging of skeletal muscle in normal volunteers

    J. L. Fleckenstein;R. C. Canby;R. W. Parkey;Ronald M Peshock

  • Denervated human skeletal muscle: MR imaging evaluation.

    James L. Fleckenstein;Denton Watumull;Kevin E. Conner;Marybeth Ezaki

  • Relationship of Generalized and Regional Adiposity to Insulin Sensitivity in Men With NIDDM

    Nicola Abate;Abhimanyu Garg;Ronald M Peshock;James Stray-Gundersen

  • Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Is More Prevalent in Blacks Than Whites in the General Population. The Dallas Heart Study

    Mark H Drazner;Daniel L. Dries;Ronald M Peshock;Richard S. Cooper

  • Influence of body fat content and distribution on variation in metabolic risk.

    Gloria Lena Vega;Beverley Adams-Huet;Ron Peshock;DuWayne Willett

  • Association between Chronic Kidney Disease and Coronary Artery Calcification: The Dallas Heart Study

    Holly Kramer;Robert D Toto;Ronald M Peshock;Richard Cooper

  • Cardiac Remodeling in Response to 1 Year of Intensive Endurance Training

    Armin Arbab-Zadeh;Merja Perhonen;Erin Howden;Ronald M. Peshock

  • OSTEOMYELITIS : CHARACTERISTICS AND PITFALLS OF DIAGNOSIS WITH MR IMAGING

    William A. Erdman;Fabio Tamburro;Fabio Tamburro;Hal T. Jayson;Paul T Weatherall

  • Estimation of human myocardial mass with MR imaging.

    J. Katz;M. C. Milliken;J. Stray-Gundersen;L. M. Buja

  • Administration of an intravenous perfluorocarbon contrast agent improves echocardiographic determination of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: comparison with cine magnetic resonance imaging.

    W.Gregory Hundley;W.Gregory Hundley;Ali M Kizilbash;Imran Afridi;Fatima Franco

  • Women have higher left ventricular ejection fractions than men independent of differences in left ventricular volume : The dallas heart study

    Anne K. Chung;Sandeep R. Das;David Leonard;Ronald M. Peshock

  • Sex Steroid Hormones, Upper Body Obesity, and Insulin Resistance

    Nicola Abate;Steven M. Haffner;Abhimanyu Garg;Ronald M. Peshock

  • Adipose tissue distribution pattern in patients with familial partial lipodystrophy (Dunnigan variety).

    Abhimanyu Garg;Ronald M. Peshock;James L. Fleckenstein

  • Relationship Between C-Reactive Protein and Subclinical Atherosclerosis The Dallas Heart Study

    Amit Khera;James A. de Lemos;Ronald M. Peshock;Hao S. Lo

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark H. Drazner
Mark H. Drazner The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Amit Khera
Amit Khera Harvard University
James A. de Lemos
James A. de Lemos The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Benjamin D. Levine
Benjamin D. Levine The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
W. Gregory Hundley
W. Gregory Hundley Virginia Commonwealth University
Craig R. Malloy
Craig R. Malloy The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Scott M. Grundy
Scott M. Grundy The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Myron F. Weiner
Myron F. Weiner The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Abhimanyu Garg
Abhimanyu Garg The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Jere H. Mitchell
Jere H. Mitchell The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in a healthcare career but aren’t pursuing traditional medical school, there are flexible online degrees and pathways available. Programs in healthcare administration degree online offer affordable, accredited routes into hospital management, operations, and leadership roles for those with an interest in the non-clinical side of healthcare.

For those seeking advanced leadership positions, an online master’s, such as the cheapest online master degree in healthcare administration, can provide specialized skills in policy, finance, and healthcare systems with increased flexibility for working professionals.

Clinicians looking to advance their practice may consider a cheapest dnp (Doctor of Nursing Practice) program, which focuses on executive, clinical, and academic leadership in nursing.

Pharmacy is another promising career with strong online options. Explore the cheapest online pharmacy school programs for flexible, accredited study leading to a doctorate and licensure in pharmacy practice.

Best Scientists Citing Ronald M Peshock

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles