World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 80 17215 16178 8626 7972 278 21129

Ronald M Peshock publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ronald M Peshock between 1979 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ronald M Peshock published across 47 years, from 1979 to 2025, averaging 6.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 1993. 7 of the 289 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1979 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 1993. 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 9 publications 1987: 7 publications 1988: 6 publications 1989: 8 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 16 publications 1992: 12 publications 1993: 18 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 13 publications 1996: 10 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 5 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 6 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 3 publications
1979 2025

289 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ronald M Peshock: publications per year, 1979 to 2025
Year Publications
1979 1
1980 0
1981 0
1982 2
1983 3
1984 3
1985 4
1986 9
1987 7
1988 6
1989 8
1990 6
1991 16
1992 12
1993 18
1994 6
1995 13
1996 10
1997 3
1998 10
1999 5
2000 2
2001 2
2002 1
2003 1
2004 5
2005 7
2006 7
2007 11
2008 9
2009 6
2010 14
2011 5
2012 5
2013 11
2014 9
2015 8
2016 1
2017 6
2018 3
2019 3
2020 8
2021 7
2022 4
2023 5
2024 4
2025 3
Total 289
Download as CSV

Ronald M Peshock publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronald M Peshock sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 261–280 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 278 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722 278
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Ronald M Peshock D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronald M Peshock sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80–81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972 80
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ronald M Peshock is affiliated with The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in the United States. Their research spans a broad range of topics primarily within medicine, with extensive contributions to radiology, cardiology, and health informatics.

Their publication record includes significant work in the areas of cardiac imaging, radiology practices, artificial intelligence in healthcare, muscle physiology, cardiomyopathy studies, cardiovascular risk factors, and venous thromboembolism diagnosis and management.

  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Radiology practices and education
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management

They have co-authored with several frequent collaborators, including Mark H. Drazner, Fernando Uliana Kay, Suhny Abbara, James A. de Lemos, and Colby Ayers, indicating an active engagement in collaborative research efforts.

  • Mark H. Drazner
  • Fernando Uliana Kay
  • Suhny Abbara
  • James A. de Lemos
  • Colby Ayers

Ronald M Peshock's work is published in a variety of notable journals, with a focus on cardiovascular and radiological research.

  • Circulation (7 publications)
  • Radiology (3 publications)
  • American Journal of Roentgenology (2 publications)
  • Journal of the American College of Radiology (2 publications)
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (2 publications)

Recent papers demonstrate an intersection of imaging technology, artificial intelligence, and cardiovascular medicine. These include:

  • Active Reprioritization of the Reading Worklist Using Artificial Intelligence Has a Beneficial Effect on the Turnaround Time for Interpretation of Head CT with Intracranial Hemorrhage, 2020, Radiology Artificial Intelligence
  • Prevalence of pectus excavatum in an adult population-based cohort estimated from radiographic indices of chest wall shape, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • Supranormal Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction, Stroke Volume, and Cardiovascular Risk, 2022, JACC Heart Failure
  • Radiologist Worklist Reprioritization Using Artificial Intelligence: Impact on Report Turnaround Times for CTPA Examinations Positive for Acute Pulmonary Embolism, 2023, American Journal of Roentgenology
  • Detection of Incidental Pulmonary Embolism on Conventional Contrast-Enhanced Chest CT: Comparison of an Artificial Intelligence Algorithm and Clinical Reports, 2022, American Journal of Roentgenology

Their research contributions emphasize the use of artificial intelligence to improve imaging workflow efficiency and diagnostic accuracy, alongside investigations into cardiovascular function and structural abnormalities. The interdisciplinary nature of their work reflects a blend of internal medicine, molecular biology, and imaging sciences to address complex clinical problems.

Best Publications

  • Relationships of generalized and regional adiposity to insulin sensitivity in men.

    N. Abate;Abhimanyu Garg;Ronald M Peshock;J. Stray-Gundersen

  • Cardiac Failure in Transgenic Mice With Myocardial Expression of Tumor Necrosis Factor-α

    Debora Bryant;Lisa Becker;James A Richardson;John Shelton

  • The Dallas Heart Study: a population-based probability sample for the multidisciplinary study of ethnic differences in cardiovascular health.

    Ronald G. Victor;Robert W Haley;Duwayne L Willett;Ronald M Peshock

  • Cardiac atrophy after bed rest and spaceflight.

    Merja A. Perhonen;Fatima Franco;Lynda D. Lane;Jay C. Buckey

  • Human αB-Crystallin Mutation Causes Oxido-Reductive Stress and Protein Aggregation Cardiomyopathy in Mice

    Namakkal S. Rajasekaran;Patrice Connell;Elisabeth S. Christians;Liang Jun Yan

  • Estimation of adipose tissue mass by magnetic resonance imaging: validation against dissection in human cadavers.

    Nicola Abate;Dennis Burns;Ronald M. Peshock;Abhimanyu Garg

  • Acute effects of exercise on MR imaging of skeletal muscle in normal volunteers

    J. L. Fleckenstein;R. C. Canby;R. W. Parkey;Ronald M Peshock

  • Denervated human skeletal muscle: MR imaging evaluation.

    James L. Fleckenstein;Denton Watumull;Kevin E. Conner;Marybeth Ezaki

  • Relationship of Generalized and Regional Adiposity to Insulin Sensitivity in Men With NIDDM

    Nicola Abate;Abhimanyu Garg;Ronald M Peshock;James Stray-Gundersen

  • Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Is More Prevalent in Blacks Than Whites in the General Population. The Dallas Heart Study

    Mark H Drazner;Daniel L. Dries;Ronald M Peshock;Richard S. Cooper

  • Influence of body fat content and distribution on variation in metabolic risk.

    Gloria Lena Vega;Beverley Adams-Huet;Ron Peshock;DuWayne Willett

  • Association between Chronic Kidney Disease and Coronary Artery Calcification: The Dallas Heart Study

    Holly Kramer;Robert D Toto;Ronald M Peshock;Richard Cooper

  • Cardiac Remodeling in Response to 1 Year of Intensive Endurance Training

    Armin Arbab-Zadeh;Merja Perhonen;Erin Howden;Ronald M. Peshock

  • OSTEOMYELITIS : CHARACTERISTICS AND PITFALLS OF DIAGNOSIS WITH MR IMAGING

    William A. Erdman;Fabio Tamburro;Fabio Tamburro;Hal T. Jayson;Paul T Weatherall

  • Estimation of human myocardial mass with MR imaging.

    J. Katz;M. C. Milliken;J. Stray-Gundersen;L. M. Buja

  • Administration of an intravenous perfluorocarbon contrast agent improves echocardiographic determination of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: comparison with cine magnetic resonance imaging.

    W.Gregory Hundley;W.Gregory Hundley;Ali M Kizilbash;Imran Afridi;Fatima Franco

  • Women have higher left ventricular ejection fractions than men independent of differences in left ventricular volume : The dallas heart study

    Anne K. Chung;Sandeep R. Das;David Leonard;Ronald M. Peshock

  • Sex Steroid Hormones, Upper Body Obesity, and Insulin Resistance

    Nicola Abate;Steven M. Haffner;Abhimanyu Garg;Ronald M. Peshock

  • Adipose tissue distribution pattern in patients with familial partial lipodystrophy (Dunnigan variety).

    Abhimanyu Garg;Ronald M. Peshock;James L. Fleckenstein

  • Relationship Between C-Reactive Protein and Subclinical Atherosclerosis The Dallas Heart Study

    Amit Khera;James A. de Lemos;Ronald M. Peshock;Hao S. Lo

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark H. Drazner
Mark H. Drazner The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Amit Khera
Amit Khera Harvard University
James A. de Lemos
James A. de Lemos The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Benjamin D. Levine
Benjamin D. Levine The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
W. Gregory Hundley
W. Gregory Hundley Virginia Commonwealth University
Craig R. Malloy
Craig R. Malloy The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Scott M. Grundy
Scott M. Grundy The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Myron F. Weiner
Myron F. Weiner The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Abhimanyu Garg
Abhimanyu Garg The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Jere H. Mitchell
Jere H. Mitchell The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in a healthcare career but aren’t pursuing traditional medical school, there are flexible online degrees and pathways available. Programs in healthcare administration degree online offer affordable, accredited routes into hospital management, operations, and leadership roles for those with an interest in the non-clinical side of healthcare.

For those seeking advanced leadership positions, an online master’s, such as the cheapest online master degree in healthcare administration, can provide specialized skills in policy, finance, and healthcare systems with increased flexibility for working professionals.

Clinicians looking to advance their practice may consider a cheapest dnp (Doctor of Nursing Practice) program, which focuses on executive, clinical, and academic leadership in nursing.

Pharmacy is another promising career with strong online options. Explore the cheapest online pharmacy school programs for flexible, accredited study leading to a doctorate and licensure in pharmacy practice.

Best Scientists Citing Ronald M Peshock

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles