World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
103
Citations
34388
World Ranking
7430
National Ranking
3885

Jere H. Mitchell publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jere H. Mitchell sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 436 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jere H. Mitchell D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jere H. Mitchell sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 103 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jere H. Mitchell is affiliated with The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the broad field of Medicine, with a focus on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Physiology, Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, and Molecular Biology.

Their work addresses several interconnected topics, including Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control, Cardiovascular and Exercise Physiology, Neuroscience of Respiration and Sleep, Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies, Adipose Tissue and Metabolism, Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments, and Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology.

Jere H. Mitchell has contributed to multiple recent publications, highlighting research on diabetic models, cardiovascular regulation, and sympathetic nervous system activity. Notable papers include:

  • TRPV1 (Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid 1) Sensitization of Skeletal Muscle Afferents in Type 2 Diabetic Rats With Hyperglycemia (2021, Hypertension)
  • Skeletal Muscle Reflex-Induced Sympathetic Dysregulation and Sensitization of Muscle Afferents in Type 1 Diabetic Rats (2020, Hypertension)
  • Insulin resistance is associated with an exaggerated blood pressure response to ischemic rhythmic handgrip exercise in nondiabetic older adults (2020, Journal of Applied Physiology)
  • The Impact of Insulin Resistance on Cardiovascular Control During Exercise in Diabetes (2021, Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews)
  • Exaggerated renal sympathetic nerve and pressor responses during spontaneously occurring motor activity in hypertensive rats (2023, American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology)

The frequency of publications by Jere H. Mitchell spans journals such as The FASEB Journal, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, Hypertension, Journal of Applied Physiology, and Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews.

Collaborations play an important role in their research, with frequent co-authors including Scott A. Smith, Masaki Mizuno, Gary A. Iwamoto, Wanpen Vongpatanasin, and Rie Ishizawa.

Best Publications

  • Response to exercise after bed rest and after training

    B. Saltin;G. Blomqvist;J. H. Mitchell;R. L. Johnson

  • Reflex cardiovascular and respiratory responses originating in exercising muscle

    D. I. McCloskey;J. H. Mitchell

  • Task Force 8: Classification of sports

    Jere H. Mitchell;William Haskell;Peter Snell;Steven P. Van Camp

  • Effects of static muscular contraction on impulse activity of groups III and IV afferents in cats

    M. P. Kaufman;J. C. Longhurst;K. J. Rybicki;J. H. Wallach

  • Cardiovascular and respiratory responses to changes in central command during isometric exercise at constant muscle tension

    G. M. Goodwin;D. I. McCloskey;Jere H Mitchell

  • The physiological meaning of the maximal oxygen intake test.

    Jere H. Mitchell;Brian J. Sproule;Carleton B. Chapman

  • The exercise pressor reflex: its cardiovascular effects, afferent mechanisms, and central pathways.

    J. H. Mitchell;Marc P Kaufman;G. A. Iwamoto

  • Functional Sympatholysis During Muscular Activity OBSERVATIONS ON INFLUENCE OF CAROTID SINUS ON OXYGEN UPTAKE

    John P. Remensnyder;Jere H. Mitchell;Stanley J. Sarnoff

  • J.B. Wolffe memorial lecture. Neural control of the circulation during exercise.

    Jere H Mitchell

  • Maximal oxygen uptake.

    Jere H. Mitchell;Gunnar Blomqvist

  • A 30-Year Follow-Up of the Dallas Bed Rest and Training Study I. Effect of Age on the Cardiovascular Response to Exercise

    Darren K. McGuire;Benjamin D. Levine;Jon W. Williamson;Peter G. Snell

  • Homeometric autoregulation in the heart.

    S. J. Sarnoff;J. H. Mitchell;J. P. Gilmore;J. P. Remensnyder

  • Hemodynamic determinants of the maximal rate of rise of left ventricular pressure.

    A. G. Wallace;N. S. Skinner;J. H. Mitchell

  • New insights into central cardiovascular control during exercise in humans: a central command update.

    J. W. Williamson;P. J. Fadel;J. H. Mitchell

  • Human aging: changes in structure and function.

    Edward G. Lakatta;Jere H. Mitchell;Ariela Pomerance;George G. Rowe

  • A 30-Year Follow-Up of the Dallas Bed Rest and Training Study II. Effect of Age on Cardiovascular Adaptation to Exercise Training

    Darren K. McGuire;Benjamin D. Levine;Jon W. Williamson;Peter G. Snell

  • The effects of acid-base disturbances on cardiovascular and pulmonary function

    Jere H. Mitchell;Kern Wildenthal;Robert L. Johnson

  • Cardiovascular Reflex Control by Afferent Fibers from Skeletal Muscle Receptors

    Jere H. Mitchell;Robert F. Schmidt

  • Estimation of human myocardial mass with MR imaging.

    J. Katz;M. C. Milliken;J. Stray-Gundersen;L. M. Buja

  • 26th Bethesda Conferance: Recommendations for determining eligibility for competetion in athletes with cardiovascular abnormalities

    Barry J. Maron;Jere H. Mitchell

Frequent Co-Authors

Niels H. Secher
Niels H. Secher University of Copenhagen
Benjamin D. Levine
Benjamin D. Levine The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Bengt Saltin
Bengt Saltin University of Copenhagen
Darren K. McGuire
Darren K. McGuire The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Ronald M Peshock
Ronald M Peshock The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Barry J. Maron
Barry J. Maron University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Ronald G. Victor
Ronald G. Victor Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
John T. Potts
John T. Potts Harvard University
William L. Haskell
William L. Haskell Stanford University
Tony G. Waldrop
Tony G. Waldrop University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering a future in medicine, there are several online degrees and career pathways that might suit your interests and professional goals. For those interested in nursing, it's important to note that there are nursing schools that don't require teas, making entry into nursing programs more accessible for some students.

For those drawn to leadership and organizational roles in healthcare, pursuing a healthcare administration online degree opens doors to management and administrative positions in hospitals, clinics, and other health organizations.

Registered Nurses aiming to advance their careers can explore rn to np programs online. These bridge programs offer a flexible pathway to become a Nurse Practitioner, increasing both expertise and earning potential.

Additionally, for those passionate about diet, wellness, and public health, an online degree nutrition can lead to careers ranging from clinical settings to community programs.

Exploring these diverse options can help you tailor your healthcare journey to your unique interests and needs, all while benefiting from the flexibility of online education.

Best Scientists Citing Jere H. Mitchell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles