World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
47
Citations
29493
World Ranking
5653
National Ranking
2051

Robert M. Hirsch publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert M. Hirsch sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 117 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Robert M. Hirsch D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert M. Hirsch sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1995 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Robert M. Hirsch is affiliated with the United States Geological Survey in the United States. Their primary field of study is Environmental Science, with a focus on several subfields including Water Science and Technology, Environmental Chemistry, Global and Planetary Change, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, and Nature and Landscape Conservation.

The scientist's research encompasses a range of topics related to hydrology and environmental processes. Key areas of study include Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies, Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics, Fish Ecology and Management Studies, Flood Risk Assessment and Management, Mercury Impact and Mitigation Studies, Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes, and Soil Erosion and Sediment Transport.

Robert M. Hirsch has contributed to multiple publications, with research appearing in various scientific venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • Water Resources Research
  • Ecological Indicators
  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association
  • Techniques and methods

Selected recent papers authored or coauthored by Hirsch include:

  • "Statistical methods in water resources" (2020), published in Techniques and methods
  • "Substantial Declines in Salinity Observed Across the Upper Colorado River Basin During the 20th Century, 1929-2019" (2021), published in Water Resources Research
  • "Lake Erie tributary nutrient trend evaluation: Normalizing concentrations and loads to reduce flow variability" (2021), published in Ecological Indicators
  • "The Occurrence of Large Floods in the United States in the Modern Hydroclimate Regime: Seasonality, Trends, and Large-Scale Climate Associations" (2022), published in Water Resources Research
  • "Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Low Streamflow and Precipitation Changes in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed" (2020), published in JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association

Frequent collaborators in Hirsch's work include S. A. Archfield, Christine A. Rumsey, Olivia Miller, Thomas M. Marston, and David D. Susong.

In recognition of contributions to science, Robert M. Hirsch was awarded the status of Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1995.

Best Publications

  • Statistical methods in water resources

    Dennis R. Helsel;Robert M. Hirsch

  • Stationarity Is Dead: Whither Water Management?

    P. C. D. Milly;Julio Betancourt;Malin Falkenmark;Robert M. Hirsch

  • Techniques of trend analysis for monthly water quality data

    Robert M. Hirsch;James R. Slack;Richard A. Smith

  • A Nonparametric Trend Test for Seasonal Data With Serial Dependence

    Robert M. Hirsch;James R. Slack

  • Statistical methods in water resources

    Dennis R. Helsel;Robert M. Hirsch;Karen R. Ryberg;Stacey A. Archfield

  • SELECTION OF METHODS FOR THE DETECTION AND ESTIMATION OF TRENDS IN WATER QUALITY

    Robert M. Hirsch;Richard B. Alexander;Richard A. Smith

  • Estimating constituent loads

    Timothy A. Cohn;Lewis L. Delong;Edward J. Gilroy;Robert M. Hirsch

  • Weighted Regressions on Time, Discharge, and Season (WRTDS), with an Application to Chesapeake Bay River Inputs

    Robert M. Hirsch;Douglas L. Moyer;Stacey A. Archfield

  • Monitoring and Understanding Changes in Heat Waves, Cold Waves, Floods, and Droughts in the United States: State of Knowledge

    Thomas C. Peterson;Richard R. Heim;Robert Hirsch;Dale P. Kaiser

  • A Comparison of Four Streamflow Record Extension Techniques

    Robert M. Hirsch

  • Statistical analysis of hydrologic data.

    R. M. Hirsch;D. R. Helsel;T. A. Cohn;E. J. Gilroy

  • River chloride trends in snow-affected urban watersheds: increasing concentrations outpace urban growth rate and are common among all seasons.

    Steven R. Corsi;Laura A. De Cicco;Michelle A. Lutz;Robert M. Hirsch

  • On Critiques of “Stationarity is Dead: Whither Water Management?”

    Paul C.D. Milly;Julio L. Betancourt;Malin Falkenmark;Robert M. Hirsch

  • Nitrate in the Mississippi River and Its Tributaries, 1980 to 2008: Are We Making Progress?

    Lori A. Sprague;Robert M. Hirsch;Brent T. Aulenbach

  • Has the magnitude of floods across the USA changed with global CO2 levels

    Robert M. Hirsch;Karen R. Ryberg

  • METHODS OF FITTING A STRAIGHT LINE TO DATA: EXAMPLES IN WATER RESOURCES

    Robert M. Hirsch;Edward J. Gilroy

  • User guide to Exploration and Graphics for RivEr Trends (EGRET) and dataRetrieval: R packages for hydrologic data

    Robert M. Hirsch;Laura A. De Cicco

  • Concepts for a National Water-Quality Assessment Program

    Robert M. Hirsch;William M. Alley;William G. Wilber

  • Mean square error of regression-based constituent transport estimates

    E. J. Gilroy;R. M. Hirsch;T. A. Cohn

  • The influence of man on hydrologic systems

    Robert M. Hirsch;John F. Walker;J. C. Day;Raimo Kallio

Frequent Co-Authors

Dennis P. Lettenmaier
Dennis P. Lettenmaier University of California, Los Angeles
David M. Wolock
David M. Wolock United States Geological Survey
Alberto Viglione
Alberto Viglione Polytechnic University of Turin
Zbigniew W. Kundzewicz
Zbigniew W. Kundzewicz Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
Russell S. Vose
Russell S. Vose National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Kenneth E. Kunkel
Kenneth E. Kunkel North Carolina State University
Gabriele Villarini
Gabriele Villarini Princeton University
Donald J. Wuebbles
Donald J. Wuebbles University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Malin Falkenmark
Malin Falkenmark Stockholm University
Thomas C. Peterson
Thomas C. Peterson National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their career in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open up diverse opportunities. Many professionals pursue advanced education such as eds to edd programs to deepen their expertise and prepare for leadership roles in education and policy development.

Social work intersects with environmental advocacy, making a fully funded dsw programs an attractive path for those aiming to address community and environmental health issues. These programs provide critical skills for tackling social determinants of environmental problems.

For students seeking flexible and budget-friendly options, a low cost online general studies degree can serve as a foundational stepping stone into environmental fields or specialized graduate studies.

Additionally, selecting the easiest bachelor's degree programs related to environmental sciences allows students to efficiently gain essential knowledge and skills, balancing academic commitments with work or other responsibilities.

Best Scientists Citing Robert M. Hirsch

Trending Scientists