World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Biology and Biochemistry
UK
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
120
Citations
75884
World Ranking
3673
National Ranking
362

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
118
Citations
73017
World Ranking
687
National Ranking
36

Mark B. Pepys publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark B. Pepys sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 376 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Mark B. Pepys D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark B. Pepys sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 118 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Biology and Biochemistry in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Biology and Biochemistry in United Kingdom Leader Award

Overview

Mark B. Pepys is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a focus on subfields such as Molecular Biology, Physiology, Oncology, Genetics, and Epidemiology.

The main topics of Pepys's work include:

  • Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis
  • Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
  • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases

Pepys's notable recent papers comprise:

  • "C-reactive protein predicts outcome in COVID-19: is it also a therapeutic target?", 2021, European Heart Journal

Frequent co-authors in Pepys's research include:

  • Stéphan Ellmerich
  • Graham W. Taylor
  • Diana Canetti
  • Guglielmo Verona
  • P. Patrizia Mangione

Pepys has published in various scientific venues, notably:

  • Open Biology
  • European Heart Journal
  • Nature Communications
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry
  • Brain Communications

Best Publications

  • C-reactive protein: a critical update

    Mark B. Pepys;Gideon M. Hirschfield

  • C-Reactive Protein and Other Circulating Markers of Inflammation in the Prediction of Coronary Heart Disease

    John Danesh;Jeremy G Wheeler;Gideon M Hirschfield;Shinichi Eda

  • The Prognostic Value of C-Reactive Protein and Serum Amyloid A Protein in Severe Unstable Angina

    Liuzzo G;Biasucci Lm;Gallimore;Grillo Rl

  • C-Reactive Protein, a Sensitive Marker of Inflammation, Predicts Future Risk of Coronary Heart Disease in Initially Healthy Middle-Aged Men Results From the MONICA (Monitoring Trends and Determinants in Cardiovascular Disease) Augsburg Cohort Study, 1984 to 1992

    Wolfgang Koenig;Malte Sund;Margit Fröhlich;Hans-Günther Fischer

  • C-reactive protein concentration and risk of coronary heart disease, stroke, and mortality: an individual participant meta-analysis.

    S Kaptoge;E Di Angelantonio;G Lowe

  • Low grade inflammation and coronary heart disease: prospective study and updated meta-analyses

    John Danesh;Peter Whincup;Mary Walker;Lucy Lennon

  • Production of C-reactive protein and risk of coronary events in stable and unstable angina

    F. Haverkate;S.G. Thompson;S.D.M. Pyke;J.R. Gallimore

  • Common core structure of amyloid fibrils by synchrotron X-ray diffraction.

    Margaret Sunde;Louise C Serpell;Mark Bartlam;Paul E Fraser

  • Acute phase proteins with special reference to C-reactive protein and related proteins (pentaxins) and serum amyloid A protein.

    M.B. Pepys;Marilyn L. Baltz

  • Instability, unfolding and aggregation of human lysozyme variants underlying amyloid fibrillogenesis

    David R. Booth;Margaret Sunde;Vittorio Bellotti;Vittorio Bellotti;Carol V. Robinson

  • C-Reactive Protein, Fibrinogen, and Cardiovascular Disease Prediction

    Stephen Kaptoge;Emanuele Di Angelantonio;Lisa Pennells;Angela M. Wood

  • The physiological structure of human C-reactive protein and its complex with phosphocholine.

    Darren Thompson;Mark B Pepys;Steve P Wood

  • C-REACTIVE PROTEIN FIFTY YEARS ON

    M.B. Pepys

  • Association between C-reactive protein and features of the metabolic syndrome: a population-based study.

    Margit Fröhlich;Armin Imhof;Gabriele Berg;Winston L. Hutchinson

  • Targeting C-reactive protein for the treatment of cardiovascular disease

    Mark B Pepys;Gideon M Hirschfield;Glenys A Tennent;J Ruth Gallimore

  • Metabolic and scintigraphic studies of radioiodinated human C-reactive protein in health and disease.

    D M Vigushin;M B Pepys;P N Hawkins

  • Human lysozyme gene mutations cause hereditary systemic amyloidosis

    M. B. Pepys;P. N. Hawkins;D. R. Booth;D. M. Vigushin

  • Misdiagnosis of hereditary amyloidosis as AL (primary) amyloidosis.

    Helen J Lachmann;David R Booth;Susanne E Booth;Alison Bybee

  • C-Reactive Protein and Complement Are Important Mediators of Tissue Damage in Acute Myocardial Infarction

    M. Griselli;J. Herbert;W.L. Hutchinson;K.M. Taylor

  • Amyloid load and clinical outcome in AA amyloidosis in relation to circulating concentration of serum amyloid A protein.

    Julian D Gillmore;Laurence B Lovat;Malcolm R Persey;Mark B Pepys

Frequent Co-Authors

Philip N. Hawkins
Philip N. Hawkins University College London
Julian D. Gillmore
Julian D. Gillmore University College London
Vittorio Bellotti
Vittorio Bellotti University College London
David R. Booth
David R. Booth University of Sydney
Gideon M. Hirschfield
Gideon M. Hirschfield University Health Network
Helen J. Lachmann
Helen J. Lachmann University College London
Wolfgang Koenig
Wolfgang Koenig German Heart Centre
Gordon D.O. Lowe
Gordon D.O. Lowe University of Glasgow
Carol V. Robinson
Carol V. Robinson University of Oxford
Caroline Sabin
Caroline Sabin University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens doors to numerous dynamic professions in healthcare and life sciences. As the industry evolves, students increasingly explore flexible educational options and new career paths, such as medical coding, health information management, and nutrition.

For those interested in data-driven roles, understanding medical.coding salary trends can be reassuring—medical coders are in high demand and offer competitive compensation. Examining the medical coding job outlook reveals strong stability and growth, making this a practical avenue for science graduates.

Online degrees, such as a health information management degree online, provide flexibility for working professionals and enable specialization in health technology. Similarly, earning a master degree in nutrition online can lead to careers in clinical nutrition, wellness consultation, and public health sectors.

Exploring these related fields can expand your career prospects and open new pathways in the ever-changing world of healthcare and science.

Best Scientists Citing Mark B. Pepys

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles