World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
42
Citations
23302
World Ranking
7363
National Ranking
3970

Ronnie Janoff-Bulman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronnie Janoff-Bulman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 82 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Ronnie Janoff-Bulman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronnie Janoff-Bulman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ronnie Janoff-Bulman is affiliated with the University of Massachusetts Amherst in the United States. Their academic profile indicates a focus on contributions linked to book publications, particularly through Yale University Press.

Their recorded book publications include two works titled The Two Moralities, both published in 2023 by Yale University Press. These books have accrued citations reflecting some engagement within the scholarly community.

Due to the absence of additional data on recent papers, frequent co-authors, or specific research topics, the profile concentrates on these documented academic contributions.

Best Publications

  • Shattered Assumptions: Towards a New Psychology of Trauma

    Ronnie Janoff-Bulman

  • Lottery winners and accident victims: Is happiness relative?

    Philip Brickman;Dan Coates;Ronnie Janoff-Bulman

  • Assumptive Worlds and the Stress of Traumatic Events: Applications of the Schema Construct

    Ronnie Janoff-Bulman

  • Characterological Versus Behavioral Self-Blame: Inquiries Into Depression and Rape

    Ronnie Janoff-Bulman

  • A Theoretical Perspective for Understanding Reactions to Victimization

    Ronnie Janoff-Bulman;Irene Hanson Frieze

  • Characterological versus behavioral self-blame: inquiries into depression and rape.

    Unknown

  • The impact of trauma on meaning: From meaningless world to meaningful life.

    Ronnie Janoff-Bulman;Cynthia McPherson Frantz

  • Proscriptive versus prescriptive morality: two faces of moral regulation.

    Ronnie Janoff-Bulman;Sana Sheikh;Sebastian Hepp

  • Posttraumatic Growth: Three Explanatory Models

    Ronnie Janoff-Bulman

  • Schema-Change Perspectives on Posttraumatic Growth

    Ronnie Janoff-Bulman

  • Grief and the Search for Meaning: Exploring the Assumptive Worlds of Bereaved College Students

    Steven S. Schwartzberg;Ronnie Janoff-Bulman

  • Surveying the Moral Landscape Moral Motives and Group-Based Moralities

    Ronnie Janoff-Bulman;Nate C. Carnes

  • Childhood attachment and abuse: long-term effects on adult attachment, depression, and conflict resolution.

    Thomas Styron;Ronnie Janoff-Bulman

  • Long-term impact of parental divorce on optimism and trust: changes in general assumptions or narrow beliefs?

    Kathryn M. Franklin;Ronnie Janoff-Bulman;John E. Roberts

  • To Provide or Protect: Motivational Bases of Political Liberalism and Conservatism

    Ronnie Janoff-Bulman

  • The “Shoulds” and “Should Nots” of Moral Emotions: A Self-Regulatory Perspective on Shame and Guilt

    Sana Sheikh;Ronnie Janoff-Bulman

  • Optimism about Love Relationships: General vs Specific Lessons from One's Personal Experiences

    Katherine B. Carnelley;Ronnie Janoff-Bulman

  • Attributions, vulnerability, and psychological adjustment: the case of breast cancer.

    Christine Timko;Ronnie Janoff-Bulman

  • Esteem and control bases of blame: “Adaptive” strategies for victims versus observers

    Ronnie Janoff-Bulman

  • Approach Versus Avoidance Goals: Differences in Seff-Evaluation and Well-Being

    Erik J. Coats;Ronnie Janoff-Bulman;Nancy Alpert

  • Mapping moral motives : Approach, avoidance, and political orientation

    Ronnie Janoff-Bulman;Sana Sheikh;Kate G. Baldacci

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Parker
Michael Parker University of Oxford
John E. Roberts
John E. Roberts University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Larry Davidson
Larry Davidson Yale University
Brian Lickel
Brian Lickel University of Massachusetts Amherst
Irene Hanson Frieze
Irene Hanson Frieze University of Pittsburgh
Ellen J. Langer
Ellen J. Langer Harvard University
Adam Smith
Adam Smith Boston University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens doors to a wide array of career opportunities, including specialized fields like speech-language pathology. If you’re interested in helping individuals overcome communication and swallowing disorders, pursuing a career as a speech-language pathologist (SLP) could be a great fit. SLPs are in demand across the US, but each state sets specific educational and certification requirements.

For example, if you want to practice in Washington, you’ll need to meet the Washington speech pathologist certification requirements. Similarly, becoming a speech therapist in West Virginia involves a distinct process, including graduate study and licensure; learn more about becoming a speech therapist in West Virginia.

Requirements vary further from state to state. Aspiring professionals should also review Wisconsin slp certification requirements or find guidance on Wyoming slp certification requirements as part of their research. Many online psychology programs now include pathways or concentrations designed for careers such as SLP, providing both the foundational knowledge and flexibility for today’s students.

Best Scientists Citing Ronnie Janoff-Bulman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles