World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
134
Citations
71454
World Ranking
2140
National Ranking
227

Philip N. Hawkins publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip N. Hawkins sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 892 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Philip N. Hawkins D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip N. Hawkins sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 134 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Philip N. Hawkins is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with significant contributions to several subfields including Molecular Biology, Nephrology, Genetics, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Epidemiology.

The main topics of their work cover Amyloidosis diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes, Parathyroid disorders and treatments, Medical imaging and pathology studies, Neuroendocrine tumor research advances, Peptidase inhibition and analysis, Eosinophilic disorders and syndromes, and Dermatological and skeletal disorders.

Their recent research publications include:

  • Prevalence and Outcomes of Concomitant Aortic Stenosis and Cardiac Amyloidosis, 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Expert consensus recommendations to improve diagnosis of ATTR amyloidosis with polyneuropathy, 2020, Journal of Neurology
  • Prevalence and outcome of dual aortic stenosis and cardiac amyloid pathology in patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation, 2020, European Heart Journal
  • Impact of Earlier Diagnosis in Cardiac ATTR Amyloidosis Over the Course of 20 Years, 2022, Circulation
  • Reduction in CMR Derived Extracellular Volume With Patisiran Indicates Cardiac Amyloid Regression, 2020, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Philip N. Hawkins include:

  • Julian D. Gillmore
  • Helen J. Lachmann
  • Marianna Fontana
  • Ana Martinez-Naharro
  • Carol Whelan

Philip N. Hawkins has published frequently in journals such as:

  • European Heart Journal
  • JACC. Cardiovascular imaging
  • Circulation
  • European Journal of Heart Failure
  • Blood

Best Publications

  • Patisiran, an RNAi Therapeutic, for Hereditary Transthyretin Amyloidosis

    David Adams;Alejandra Gonzalez-Duarte;William D. O'Riordan;Chih Chao Yang

  • NALP3 Forms an IL-1β-Processing Inflammasome with Increased Activity in Muckle-Wells Autoinflammatory Disorder

    Laetitia Agostini;Fabio Martinon;Kimberly Burns;Michael F. McDermott

  • Definition of organ involvement and treatment response in immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL): A consensus opinion from the 10th International Symposium on Amyloid and Amyloidosis

    Morie A. Gertz;Ray Comenzo;Rodney H. Falk;Jean Paul Fermand

  • Nonbiopsy Diagnosis of Cardiac Transthyretin Amyloidosis.

    Julian D. Gillmore;Mathew S. Maurer;Rodney H. Falk;Giampaolo Merlini

  • Instability, unfolding and aggregation of human lysozyme variants underlying amyloid fibrillogenesis

    David R. Booth;Margaret Sunde;Vittorio Bellotti;Vittorio Bellotti;Carol V. Robinson

  • Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Cardiac Amyloidosis

    Alicia Maria Maceira;Jayshree Joshi;Sanjay Kumar Prasad;James Charles Moon

  • Neonatal-Onset Multisystem Inflammatory Disease Responsive to Interleukin-1β Inhibition

    Raphaela Goldbach-Mansky;Natalie J Dailey;Scott W Canna;Ana Gelabert

  • Natural history and outcome in systemic AA amyloidosis.

    Helen J Lachmann;Hugh J B Goodman;Janet A Gilbertson;J Ruth Gallimore

  • Safety and efficacy of RNAi therapy for transthyretin amyloidosis

    Teresa Coelho;David Adams;Ana Silva;Pierre Lozeron

  • Use of canakinumab in the cryopyrin-associated periodic syndrome.

    Helen J Lachmann;Isabelle Kone-Paut;Jasmin B Kuemmerle-Deschner;Kieron S Leslie

  • New Criteria for Response to Treatment in Immunoglobulin Light Chain Amyloidosis Based on Free Light Chain Measurement and Cardiac Biomarkers: Impact on Survival Outcomes

    Giovanni Palladini;Angela Dispenzieri;Morie A. Gertz;Shaji Kumar

  • Targeting C-reactive protein for the treatment of cardiovascular disease

    Mark B Pepys;Gideon M Hirschfield;Glenys A Tennent;J Ruth Gallimore

  • Metabolic and scintigraphic studies of radioiodinated human C-reactive protein in health and disease.

    D M Vigushin;M B Pepys;P N Hawkins

  • Human lysozyme gene mutations cause hereditary systemic amyloidosis

    M. B. Pepys;P. N. Hawkins;D. R. Booth;D. M. Vigushin

  • Misdiagnosis of hereditary amyloidosis as AL (primary) amyloidosis.

    Helen J Lachmann;David R Booth;Susanne E Booth;Alison Bybee

  • Noncontrast T1 mapping for the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis.

    Theodoros D. Karamitsos;Stefan K. Piechnik;Sanjay M. Banypersad;Marianna Fontana

  • Amyloid load and clinical outcome in AA amyloidosis in relation to circulating concentration of serum amyloid A protein.

    Julian D Gillmore;Laurence B Lovat;Malcolm R Persey;Mark B Pepys

  • Spectrum of clinical features in Muckle‐Wells syndrome and response to anakinra

    Philip N. Hawkins;Helen J. Lachmann;Ebun Aganna;Michael F. McDermott

  • Targeted pharmacological depletion of serum amyloid P component for treatment of human amyloidosis

    M. B. Pepys;J. Herbert;W. L. Hutchinson;G. A. Tennent

  • Clinical improvement and amyloid regression after liver transplantation in hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis

    G Holmgren;L Steen;O Suhr;B.-G Ericzon

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark B. Pepys
Mark B. Pepys University College London
Julian D. Gillmore
Julian D. Gillmore University College London
Helen J. Lachmann
Helen J. Lachmann University College London
James C. Moon
James C. Moon University College London
Michael F. McDermott
Michael F. McDermott University of Galway
David R. Booth
David R. Booth University of Sydney
Giampaolo Merlini
Giampaolo Merlini University of Pavia
Graham A. Hitman
Graham A. Hitman Queen Mary University of London
Vittorio Bellotti
Vittorio Bellotti University College London
J. Justin Hsuan
J. Justin Hsuan University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine? Numerous online degrees in nutrition offer foundational knowledge for healthcare roles, focusing on health, wellness, and disease prevention. This path can be ideal for those interested in dietetics or public health.

For those seeking leadership and administrative roles, accredited mha programs prepare graduates to manage hospitals, clinics, and other health organizations. These programs are recognized for meeting industry standards and typically offer flexible online study options.

Registered nurses looking to advance can consider online rn-bsn programs without clinicals, allowing them to earn their bachelor’s degree through fully online coursework. This is a convenient pathway for working professionals aiming to expand their qualifications.

If you're ready for doctoral study, accelerated dnp programs help experienced nurses achieve the highest clinical degree in a shorter time. These programs emphasize advanced practice and leadership, meeting the growing demand for highly skilled healthcare providers.

Best Scientists Citing Philip N. Hawkins

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles