World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
60
Citations
36867
World Ranking
1399
National Ranking
660

William Croft publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William Croft sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 214 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

William Croft D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William Croft sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

William Croft is affiliated with the University of New Mexico in the United States. Their professional profile reflects involvement in academic research, though specific details about recent publications, co-authors, or frequent publication venues are not currently documented.

Their work spans various fields of study; however, explicit information about these fields and subfields is not available at this time.

Similarly, there is no detailed record of main topics covered in their research portfolio or any listed awards recognizing their contributions.

No book publications or specific publishing houses are documented in relation to William Croft.

Best Publications

  • Radical construction grammar : syntactic theory in typological perspective

    William Albert Croft

  • Typology and Universals

    William Albert Croft

  • Explaining Language Change an evolutionary approach

    William Albert Croft

  • Cognitive Linguistics: Figures

    William Croft;D. Alan Cruse

  • Radical Construction Grammar

    William Croft

  • Language Is a Complex Adaptive System: Position Paper

    Clay Beckner;Richard Blythe;Joan Bybee;Morten H. Christiansen

  • Verbs: Aspect and Causal Structure

    William Albert Croft

  • Syntactic categories and grammatical relations : the cognitive organization of information

    William Albert Croft

  • The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies

    William Croft

  • Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions

    William A. Croft;Jóhanna Barðdal;Willem Hollmann;Violeta Sotirova

  • Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations

    William Croft

  • Lexical rules vs. constructions: A false dichotomy

    William A. Croft

  • Autonomy and Functionalist Linguistics

    William Croft

  • Parts of speech as language universals and as language-particular categories

    William Croft

  • Case Marking and the Semantics of Mental Verbs

    William Croft

  • Phonological development: Toward a 'radical' templatic phonology

    Marilyn Vihman;William Croft

  • Domains, image-schemas and construal.

    William Croft;T. C. Clausner

  • S-curves and the mechanisms of propagation in language change

    Richard A. Blythe;William Croft

  • Typology and Universals: List of abbreviations

    Unknown

  • Modeling language change: An evaluation of Trudgill's theory of the emergence of New Zealand English

    Gareth J. Baxter;Richard A. Blythe;William Croft;Alan J. McKane

  • Building social cognitive models of language change.

    Daniel J. Hruschka;Daniel J. Hruschka;Morten H. Christiansen;Morten H. Christiansen;Richard A. Blythe;William Croft

  • On language change: The invisible hand in language

    William Croft

Frequent Co-Authors

Morten H. Christiansen
Morten H. Christiansen Cornell University
Peter F. Stadler
Peter F. Stadler Leipzig University
Jerry R. Hobbs
Jerry R. Hobbs University of Southern California
John H. Holland
John H. Holland University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Nick C. Ellis
Nick C. Ellis University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Diane Larsen-Freeman
Diane Larsen-Freeman University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Joan L. Bybee
Joan L. Bybee University of New Mexico
Keith T. Poole
Keith T. Poole University of Georgia
T. Florian Jaeger
T. Florian Jaeger University of Rochester
Susan A. Gelman
Susan A. Gelman University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens up a wide range of impactful career opportunities. Many students now prefer the flexibility of online degrees, especially those looking for affordable yet reputable programs. For those interested in professional counseling, consider enrolling in one of the many cacrep schools, which ensure your degree meets high industry standards.

Individuals focused on helping families and couples can look into online mft programs accredited. These programs offer specialized training for those pursuing licensure as marriage and family therapists. If your passion lies in understanding human behavior, a bachelor of science in psychology provides a strong foundation and can lead to diverse roles in mental health, education, or research.

Additionally, those looking to become licensed social workers should explore msw online programs. These options are designed for accessibility and flexibility, helping you enter a range of human services fields. Whether you're just starting out or looking to advance your career, online degrees in the social sciences and humanities can provide clear, rewarding pathways.

Best Scientists Citing William Croft

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles