World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Social Sciences and Humanities
UK
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 75 519 448 90 78 316 55303

Catherine Pope publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Catherine Pope between 1991 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Catherine Pope published across 36 years, from 1991 to 2026, averaging 10.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 47 publications in 2017. 17 of the 385 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 47. Peak 47 publications in 2017. 1991: 3 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 4 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 15 publications 2003: 15 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 17 publications 2006: 20 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 19 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 23 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 47 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 16 publications 2026: 1 publication
1991 2026

385 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Catherine Pope: publications per year, 1991 to 2026
Year Publications
1991 3
1992 2
1993 3
1994 1
1995 4
1996 4
1997 1
1998 2
1999 2
2000 3
2001 8
2002 15
2003 15
2004 2
2005 17
2006 20
2007 15
2008 19
2009 10
2010 13
2011 14
2012 11
2013 10
2014 23
2015 16
2016 10
2017 47
2018 6
2019 15
2020 16
2021 10
2022 6
2023 8
2024 17
2025 16
2026 1
Total 385
Download as CSV

Catherine Pope publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Catherine Pope sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 314–323 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 316 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101 316
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Catherine Pope D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Catherine Pope sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 75 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45 75
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom

Overview

Catherine Pope is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields within medicine and health professions, with a focus on the intersection of healthcare delivery, policy, and patient experience.

The scientist has authored numerous papers covering topics such as emergency and acute care, mental health and patient involvement, telemedicine and telehealth implementation, primary care outcomes, healthcare systems and technology, art therapy and mental health, and health policy implementation science.

Notable recent publications include:

  • "Planning and Evaluating Remote Consultation Services: A New Conceptual Framework Incorporating Complexity and Practical Ethics" (2021, Frontiers in Digital Health)
  • "What would it take to meaningfully attend to ethnicity and race in health research? Learning from a trial intervention development study" (2022, Sociology of Health & Illness)
  • "Black, Asian and minority ethnic women's experiences of maternity services in the UK: A qualitative evidence synthesis" (2022, Journal of Advanced Nursing)
  • "Tailored implementation of internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy in the multinational context of the ImpleMentAll project: a study protocol for a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial" (2020, Trials)
  • "Uncovering the processes of knowledge transformation: the example of local evidence-informed policy-making in United Kingdom healthcare" (2020, Health Research Policy and Systems)

Catherine Pope frequently collaborates with several researchers, including Jennifer MacLellan, Amadea Turk, Kamal R Mahtani, Stephanie Tierney, and Helen Atherton.

Their publication record includes multiple articles in the following venues:

  • Sociology of Health & Illness
  • Health and Social Care Delivery Research
  • BMJ Open
  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BMJ Quality & Safety

Their main fields of study are Medicine and Health Professions, with specific subfields focused on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Emergency Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Economics and Econometrics.

Catherine Pope has been recognized as a Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom.

Best Publications

  • Analysing qualitative data

    Catherine Pope;Sue Ziebland;Nicholas Mays

  • Qualitative research in health care

    Catherine Pope;Nicholas Mays

  • Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research

    Nicholas Mays;Catherine Pope

  • Rigour and qualitative research.

    Nicholas Mays;Catherine Pope

  • Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research.

    Catherine Pope;Nick Mays

  • Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field

    Nicholas Mays;Catherine Pope;Jennie Popay

  • Normalisation process theory: A framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions

    Elizabeth Murray;Shaun Treweek;Catherine Pope;Anne MacFarlane

  • Using meta ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: a worked example.

    Nicky Britten;Rona Campbell;Catherine Pope;Jenny Donovan

  • Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care

    Rona Campbell;Pandora Pound;Catherine Pope;Nicky Britten

  • Resisting medicines: a synthesis of qualitative studies of medicine taking

    Pandora Pound;Nicky Britten;Myfanwy Morgan;Lucy Yardley

  • Qualitative Research: Observational methods in health care settings

    Nicholas Mays;Catherine Pope

  • Qualitative methods in research on healthcare quality

    C Pope;P van Royen;R Baker

  • Ethical Issues: Qualitative Research in Health Care 3rd Edn.

    Dawn Goodwin;N. Mays;C. Pope

  • Evaluating meta-ethnography: systematic analysis and synthesis of qualitative research.

    Rona M Campbell;Pandora Pound;M Morgan;Gavin Daker-White

  • Qualitative methods in health research

    Catherine Pope;Nicholas Mays

  • Patients' help-seeking experiences and delay in cancer presentation: a qualitative synthesis

    Lucy K Smith;Catherine Pope;Johannes L Botha

  • Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: The eMERGe reporting guidance

    Maggie Cunningham;Nicola Ring;Isabelle Uny

  • Synthesizing qualitative and quantitative health evidence: a guide to methods

    Catherine Pope;Nicholas Mays;Jennie Popay

  • Thou shalt versus thou shalt not: a meta-synthesis of GPs' attitudes to clinical practice guidelines.

    Benedicte Carlsen;Claire Glenton;Catherine Pope

  • An open letter to The BMJ editors on qualitative research

    Trisha Greenhalgh;Ellen Annandale;Richard Ashcroft;James Barlow

  • Observational methods inhealth caresettings

    Nicholas Mays;Catherine Pope

  • Evaluating meta ethnography: systematic analysis and synthesis of qualitative research (poster presentation)

    Rona M Campbell;Pandora Pound;C Pope;Jenny L Donovan

Frequent Co-Authors

Anne Rogers
Anne Rogers University of Southampton
Lucy Yardley
Lucy Yardley University of Bristol
Tom Fahey
Tom Fahey Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
Jon Nicholl
Jon Nicholl University of Sheffield
Glyn Lewis
Glyn Lewis University College London
Nicholas Mays
Nicholas Mays London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Carl May
Carl May London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Nicky Britten
Nicky Britten University of Exeter
Rona Campbell
Rona Campbell University of Bristol
Myfanwy Morgan
Myfanwy Morgan King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring the Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens the door to a diverse range of online degree options and rewarding career pathways. Many students today are seeking flexible, affordable, and reputable programs that allow them to balance studies with work and family obligations.

For those interested in helping professions, numerous msw accelerated programs are now available online, allowing you to fast-track your education and gain advanced social work skills. Similarly, if you are passionate about understanding human behavior, you might consider earning a 2-year psychology degree online, which prepares graduates for roles in mental health, education, or research.

Aspiring counselors should look for cacrep-accredited counseling programs, which are essential for licensure and provide a strong foundation for professional counseling careers. If your interests lie in supporting families and couples, you may be drawn to marriage and family therapy master's programs.

These online options offer accelerated timelines, affordability, and flexibility—making it easier than ever to pursue meaningful work in social sciences and humanities fields.

Best Scientists Citing Catherine Pope

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles