World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 54 3979 3806 1518 1402 182 13804

Uma S. Bhatt publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Uma S. Bhatt between 1989 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Uma S. Bhatt published across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025, averaging 5.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2020. 15 of the 195 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2020. 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 2 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 6 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 7 publications
1989 2025

195 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Uma S. Bhatt: publications per year, 1989 to 2025
Year Publications
1989 1
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 1
1996 2
1997 0
1998 1
1999 0
2000 1
2001 3
2002 7
2003 6
2004 4
2005 2
2006 2
2007 4
2008 1
2009 6
2010 13
2011 4
2012 9
2013 8
2014 5
2015 10
2016 11
2017 10
2018 12
2019 8
2020 19
2021 10
2022 9
2023 11
2024 8
2025 7
Total 195
Download as CSV

Uma S. Bhatt publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Uma S. Bhatt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 182 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400 182
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Uma S. Bhatt D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Uma S. Bhatt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198 54
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Uma S. Bhatt is affiliated with the University of Alaska Fairbanks in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a strong emphasis on Environmental Science. Within these fields, the main subfields of study include Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Sociology and Political Science, and Environmental Chemistry.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics, notably:

  • Climate change and permafrost
  • Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Climate variability and models
  • Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics

Uma S. Bhatt has contributed to several recent publications, including:

  • "Complexity revealed in the greening of the Arctic," 2020, Nature Climate Change
  • "Fluctuating Atlantic inflows modulate Arctic atlantification," 2023, Science
  • "Sea-ice information and forecast needs for industry maritime stakeholders," 2020, Polar Geography
  • "The Record Low Bering Sea Ice Extent in 2018: Context, Impacts, and an Assessment of the Role of Anthropogenic Climate Change," 2020, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • "Arctic Report Card 2020: Surface Air Temperature," 2020, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) - NOAA Central Library

Their frequent co-authors include Peter A. Bieniek, John E. Walsh, Gerald V. Frost, Richard Thoman, and Rick Lader.

Uma S. Bhatt has published extensively in various venues. The most frequent publication platforms are:

  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Remote Sensing
  • Earth Interactions
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) - NOAA Central Library
  • Environmental Research Letters

Best Publications

  • Climate Change and Infectious Diseases: From Evidence to a Predictive Framework

    Sonia Altizer;Richard S. Ostfeld;Pieter T. J. Johnson;Susan Kutz

  • Complexity revealed in the greening of the Arctic

    Isla H. Myers-Smith;Jeffrey T. Kerby;Gareth K. Phoenix;Jarle W. Bjerke

  • Key indicators of Arctic climate change : 1971–2017

    Jason E. Box;William T. Colgan;Torben Røjle Christensen;Torben Røjle Christensen;Niels Martin Schmidt

  • Divergent consensuses on Arctic amplification influence on midlatitude severe winter weather

    J. Cohen;X. Zhang;J. Francis;T. Jung;T. Jung

  • Ecological Consequences of Sea-Ice Decline

    Eric Post;Uma S. Bhatt;Cecilia M. Bitz;Jedediah F. Brodie

  • Climatology and Interannual Variability of Arctic Cyclone Activity: 1948–2002

    Xiangdong Zhang;John E. Walsh;Jing Zhang;Uma S. Bhatt

  • Circumpolar Arctic Tundra Vegetation Change Is Linked to Sea Ice Decline

    Uma S. Bhatt;Donald A. Walker;Martha K. Raynolds;Josefino C. Comiso

  • The Atmospheric Response to Realistic Arctic Sea Ice Anomalies in an AGCM during Winter.

    Michael A. Alexander;Uma S. Bhatt;John E. Walsh;Michael S. Timlin

  • Variability and Trends of Air Temperature and Pressure in the Maritime Arctic, 1875–2000

    Igor V. Polyakov;Roman V. Bekryaev;Roman V. Bekryaev;Genrikh V. Alekseev;Uma S. Bhatt

  • STATE OF THE CLIMATE IN 2017

    R. Abernethy;Steven A. Ackerman;R. Adler;Adelina Albanil Encarnación

  • State of the Climate in 2014

    Arlene P. Aaron-Morrison;Steven A. Ackerman;Nicolaus G. Adams;Robert F. Adler

  • Observationally based assessment of polar amplification of global warming

    Igor V. Polyakov;Genrikh V. Alekseev;Roman V. Bekryaev;Uma Bhatt

  • Dynamics of Aboveground Phytomass of the Circumpolar Arctic Tundra During the Past Three Decades

    Howard E Epstein;Martha K Raynolds;Donald A Walker;Uma S Bhatt

  • Variability of the Intermediate Atlantic Water of the Arctic Ocean over the Last 100 Years

    I. V. Polyakov;G. V. Alekseev;L. A. Timokhov;U. S. Bhatt

  • Recent Declines in Warming and Vegetation Greening Trends over Pan-Arctic Tundra

    Uma S. Bhatt;Donald A. Walker;Martha K. Raynolds;Peter A. Bieniek

  • State of the Climate in 2018

    M. Ades;R. Adler;Laura S. Aldeco;G. Alejandra

  • Long-Term Ice Variability in Arctic Marginal Seas

    Igor V. Polyakov;Genrikh V. Alekseev;Roman V. Bekryaev;Roman V. Bekryaev;Uma S. Bhatt

  • Environment, vegetation and greenness (NDVI) along the North America and Eurasia Arctic transects

    D A Walker;H E Epstein;M K Raynolds;P Kuss;P Kuss

  • A Modeling Study of the Interannual Variability in the Wintertime North Atlantic Ocean

    D. S. Battisti;U. S. Bhatt;M. A. Alexander

  • State of the Climate in 2016

    Arlene P. Aaron-Morrison;Steven A. Ackerman;Nicolaus G. Adams;Robert F. Adler

  • [Regional Climates] Central South America 2016

    J. A. Marengo;Jhan Carlo Espinoza;L. M. Alves;J. Ronchail

Frequent Co-Authors

Donald A. Walker
Donald A. Walker University of Alaska Fairbanks
Martha K. Raynolds
Martha K. Raynolds University of Alaska Fairbanks
Howard E. Epstein
Howard E. Epstein University of Virginia
Igor V. Polyakov
Igor V. Polyakov University of Alaska Fairbanks
Compton J. Tucker
Compton J. Tucker Goddard Space Flight Center
Josefino C. Comiso
Josefino C. Comiso Goddard Space Flight Center
Vladimir E. Romanovsky
Vladimir E. Romanovsky University of Alaska Fairbanks
James E. Overland
James E. Overland Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory
Muyin Wang
Muyin Wang University of Washington
Bruce C. Forbes
Bruce C. Forbes University of Lapland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, diversifying your skills through related online degrees can greatly enhance your career prospects. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) is a crucial field that marries technology with environmental data to inform decision-making. Exploring the best GIS programs in the US can provide valuable expertise for environmental analysis and management roles.

Leadership and policy development are also vital components in addressing environmental challenges. Online Master of Public Administration programs offer training in these areas, often with flexible schedules. Discover the top online MPA programs to develop skills in governance, sustainability initiatives, and public sector management.

Understanding the social dynamics behind environmental issues is equally important. A bachelors degree in sociology online can equip learners with insights into human behavior and societal trends, fostering more effective community engagement and policy development.

For those seeking advanced study, pursuing a doctoral degree without the traditional dissertation hurdle might be appealing. The online doctoral programs without dissertation enable professionals to reach the highest academic levels while focusing on practical research and leadership in environmental fields.

Best Scientists Citing Uma S. Bhatt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles