World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Joseph Galaskiewicz

Joseph Galaskiewicz

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
43
Citations
19323
World Ranking
4250
National Ranking
2025

Joseph Galaskiewicz publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph Galaskiewicz sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 115 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Joseph Galaskiewicz D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph Galaskiewicz sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joseph Galaskiewicz is affiliated with the University of Arizona in the United States. Their research primarily spans the social sciences, with a particular focus on various subfields including transportation, sociology and political science, public administration, organizational behavior and human resource management, and management information systems.

The scientist's work addresses several main topics, notably urban transport and accessibility, urban, neighborhood, and segregation studies, transportation planning and optimization, public policy and administration research, management and organizational studies, accounting and organizational management, as well as the nonprofit sector and volunteering.

Their recent publications include:

  • How does policy awareness impact consumer preferences for passenger vehicles? A study from China, 2024, Transport Policy
  • Racial/Ethnic Residential Segregation, Socioeconomic Inequality, and Job Accessibility by Public Transportation Networks in the United States, 2021, Spatial Demography
  • Reconciling Theory and Context in Comparative Nonprofit Research, 2021, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
  • A Place at the Table: Organization Theory and Public Management, 2020, Perspectives on Public Management and Governance
  • Correction to: A Place at the Table: Organization Theory and Public Management, 2020, Perspectives on Public Management and Governance

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Joseph Galaskiewicz are:

  • Kathryn Freeman Anderson
  • Andrew B. Whitford
  • H. Brinton Milward
  • Anne M. Khademian
  • Yi Zhao

Joseph Galaskiewicz's scholarly output has been published in the following venues with multiple works appearing in some:

  • Perspectives on Public Management and Governance
  • Spatial Demography
  • Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
  • Transport Policy
  • Management and Organization Review

Best Publications

  • Taking Stock of Networks and Organizations: A Multilevel Perspective

    Daniel J. Brass;Joseph Galaskiewicz;Henrich R. Greve;Wenpin Tsai

  • Mimetic Processes within an Interorganizational Field: An Empirical Test

    Joseph Galaskiewicz;Stanley Wasserman

  • Advances in Social Network Analysis: Research in the Social and Behavioral Sciences

    Stanley Wasserman;Joseph Galaskiewicz

  • Community Structure as Interorganizational Linkages

    Edward O. Laumann;Joseph Galaskiewicz;Peter V. Marsden

  • Institutional Isomorphism and Public Sector Organizations

    Peter Frumkin;Joseph Galaskiewicz

  • Interorganization Contagion in Corporate Philanthropy

    Joseph Galaskiewicz;Ronald S. Burt

  • An urban grants economy revisited: Corporate charitable contributions in the twin cities, 1979-81, 1987-89

    Joseph Galaskiewicz

  • Social Organization of an Urban Grants Economy: A Study of Business Philanthropy and Nonprofit Organizations

    Joseph Galaskiewicz

  • Interorganizational Coordination: Theory, Research, and Implementation

    David L. Rogers;David A. Whetten

  • Distribution of Knowledge, Group Network Structure, and Group Performance

    Diane L. Rulke;Joseph Galaskiewicz

  • Nonprofit Organizations in an Age of Uncertainty: A Study of Organizational Change

    Joseph Galaskiewicz;Wolfgang Bielefeld

  • Does Government Funding Suppress Nonprofits' Political Activity?

    Mark Chavesc;Laura Stephens;Joseph Galaskiewicz

  • Professional Networks and the Institutionalization of a Single Mind Set

    Joseph Galaskiewicz

  • Stock Ownership and Company Contributions to Charity

    Lisa Atkinson;Joseph Galaskiewicz

  • Networks and Organizational Growth: A Study of Community Based Nonprofits

    Joseph Galaskiewicz;Wolfgang Bielefeld;Myron Dowell

  • Exchange Networks and Community Politics

    Joseph Galaskiewicz

  • Networks of Interorganizational Relations

    Mark S. Mizruchi;Joseph Galaskiewicz

  • Social Network Analysis: Concepts, Methodology, and Directions for the 1990s

    Joseph Galaskiewicz;Stanley Wasserman

  • STRUCTURAL EMBEDDEDNESS AND THE LIABILITY OF NEWNESS AMONG NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS

    Mark A. Hager;Joseph Galaskiewicz;Jeff A. Larson

  • Nonprofit Boards: Crucibles of Expertise or Symbols of Local Identities?

    Rikki Abzug;Joseph Galaskiewicz

  • The Behavior of Organizations

    Joseph Galaskiewicz;Wolfgang Bielefeld

  • Organizations and Organization Theory.

    Joseph Galaskiewicz;Jeffrey Pfeffer

Frequent Co-Authors

Stanley Wasserman
Stanley Wasserman Indiana University
Peter V. Marsden
Peter V. Marsden Harvard University
Yanjie Bian
Yanjie Bian Xi'an Jiaotong University
Anne S. Tsui
Anne S. Tsui Arizona State University
Andrew B. Whitford
Andrew B. Whitford University of Georgia
Edward O. Laumann
Edward O. Laumann University of Chicago
H. Brinton Milward
H. Brinton Milward University of Arizona
Yoshiki Yamagata
Yoshiki Yamagata Keio University
Peter M. Blau
Peter M. Blau Columbia University
Michael W. Morris
Michael W. Morris Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens up a range of degree options and professional paths. Online education has quickly evolved, offering both flexibility and accessibility for busy learners and working adults.

For those pursuing advanced roles in psychology or mental health, there are shortest online psyd programs designed to fast-track clinical training. Aspiring marriage and family therapists can benefit from accelerated mft programs online, which shorten the time to licensure while maintaining rigorous standards.

If affordability is a primary concern, consider affordable online masters in psychology options, which allow you to balance cost with career advancement. For educators looking to move into leadership, the easiest edd programs offer a way to earn a doctorate efficiently and with minimal disruption.

These pathways not only make advanced credentials more attainable, but also connect graduates with meaningful careers in academia, mental health, public policy, and counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Joseph Galaskiewicz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles