World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
82
Citations
29676
World Ranking
15954
National Ranking
8029

Bradley N. Gaynes publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bradley N. Gaynes sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 518 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Bradley N. Gaynes D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bradley N. Gaynes sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bradley N. Gaynes is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the United States. Their research spans the fields of Medicine and Psychology, with significant contributions to Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Social Psychology, Infectious Diseases, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

Their research topics include:

  • HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Bradley N. Gaynes has published extensively, particularly in venues such as UNC Libraries, PLoS ONE, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), AIDS and Behavior, and Journal of Affective Disorders.

Some of their recent papers are:

  • "A systematic review of validated screening tools for anxiety disorders and PTSD in low to middle income countries", 2020, BMC Psychiatry
  • "The impact of an integrated depression and HIV treatment program on mental health and HIV care outcomes among people newly initiating antiretroviral therapy in Malawi", 2020, PLoS ONE
  • "Depression and Suicide Risk Screening", 2023, JAMA
  • "Stigma and mental health challenges among adolescents living with HIV in selected adolescent-specific antiretroviral therapy clinics in Zomba District, Malawi", 2022, BMC Pediatrics
  • "Scaling Up Maternal Mental healthcare by Increasing access to Treatment (SUMMIT) through non-specialist providers and telemedicine: a study protocol for a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial", 2021, Trials

Frequent co-authors of Bradley N. Gaynes include:

  • Brian W. Pence
  • Michael Udedi
  • Kazione Kulisewa
  • Mina C. Hosseinipour
  • Vivian F. Go

Best Publications

  • Perinatal depression: a systematic review of prevalence and incidence.

    Norma I. Gavin;Bradley Neil Gaynes;Kathleen N. Lohr;Samantha E Meltzer-Brody

  • Perinatal depression: prevalence, screening accuracy, and screening outcomes.

    BN Gaynes;N Gavin;S Meltzer-Brody;KN Lohr

  • The efficacy of light therapy in the treatment of mood disorders: a review and meta-analysis of the evidence.

    Robert N. Golden;Bradley N. Gaynes;R. David Ekstrom;Robert M. Hamer

  • Screening for Depression in Adults: A Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force

    Michael P. Pignone;Bradley N. Gaynes;Jerry L. Rushton;Catherine Mills Burchell

  • Psychological treatments for adults with posttraumatic stress disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis:

    Karen Cusack;Daniel E. Jonas;Catherine A. Forneris;Candi Wines

  • What did STAR*D teach us? Results from a large-scale, practical, clinical trial for patients with depression

    M.P.H. Bradley N. Gaynes;M.B.A. Diane Warden;Madhukar H. Trivedi;Stephen R. Wisniewski

  • Impact of Stressful Life Events, Depression, Social Support, Coping, and Cortisol on Progression to AIDS

    Jane Leserman;John M. Petitto;Robert N. Golden;Bradley N. Gaynes

  • Deployment and the Use of Mental Health Services among U.S. Army Wives

    Alyssa J. Mansfield;Jay S. Kaufman;Stephen W. Marshall;Bradley N. Gaynes

  • Comparative benefits and harms of second-generation antidepressants for treating major depressive disorder: an updated meta-analysis.

    Gerald Gartlehner;Richard A Hansen;Laura C Morgan;Kylie Thaler

  • Progression to AIDS, a clinical AIDS condition and mortality: psychosocial and physiological predictors.

    J. Leserman;J. M. Petitto;J. M. Petitto;J. M. Petitto;H. Gu;H. Gu;H. Gu;B. N. Gaynes;B. N. Gaynes;B. N. Gaynes

  • Efficacy and Safety of Second-Generation Antidepressants in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder

    Richard A. Hansen;Gerald Gartlehner;Kathleen N. Lohr;Bradley N. Gaynes

  • Screening for Depression in Adult Patients in Primary Care Settings: A Systematic Evidence Review

    Elizabeth A. O'Connor;Evelyn P. Whitlock;Tracy L. Beil;Bradley N. Gaynes

  • Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Bradley N. Gaynes;Stacey W. Lloyd;Linda Lux;Gerald Gartlehner;Gerald Gartlehner

  • STAR*D: Revising Conventional Wisdom

    John A. Rush;John A. Rush;Diane Warden;Stephen R. Wisniewski;Maurizio Fava

  • The Perinatal Depression Treatment Cascade: Baby Steps Toward Improving Outcomes.

    Elizabeth Q. Cox;Nathaniel A. Sowa;Samantha E Meltzer-Brody;Bradley Neil Gaynes

  • Systematic review of multifaceted interventions to improve depression care

    John W. Williams;Martha Gerrity;Tracey Holsinger;Steve Dobscha

  • Defining treatment-resistant depression.

    Bradley N Gaynes;Linda Lux;Gerald Gartlehner;Gerald Gartlehner;Gary Asher

  • Prevalence of DSM-IV-defined mood, anxiety, and substance use disorders in an HIV clinic in the Southeastern United States.

    Brian Wells Pence;William C. Miller;Kathryn Whetten;Joseph J. Eron

  • Comparative benefits and harms of second-generation antidepressants: background paper for the American College of Physicians.

    Gerald Gartlehner;Gerald Gartlehner;Bradley N. Gaynes;Richard A. Hansen;Patricia Thieda

  • Can phase III trial results of antidepressant medications be generalized to clinical practice? A STAR*D report.

    Stephen R. Wisniewski;A. John Rush;Andrew A. Nierenberg;M.P.H. Bradley N. Gaynes

Frequent Co-Authors

Kathleen N. Lohr
Kathleen N. Lohr RTI International
Madhukar H. Trivedi
Madhukar H. Trivedi The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
A. John Rush
A. John Rush Duke University
Stephen R. Wisniewski
Stephen R. Wisniewski University of Pittsburgh
Maurizio Fava
Maurizio Fava Harvard University
William C. Miller
William C. Miller The Ohio State University
Stacie B. Dusetzina
Stacie B. Dusetzina Vanderbilt University
Til Stürmer
Til Stürmer University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Andrew A. Nierenberg
Andrew A. Nierenberg Harvard University
Michael J. Mugavero
Michael J. Mugavero University of Alabama at Birmingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a future in medicine doesn’t always mean becoming a physician. There are various online degree paths and specialized programs that can open doors to rewarding healthcare careers in the USA.

Many nurses seek advanced practice roles by enrolling in a rn to np bridge program, which enables registered nurses to earn a master’s degree and become nurse practitioners more efficiently. Similarly, those interested in nutrition and wellness may consider earning an online dietitian degree to qualify for roles as nutritionists or registered dietitians.

Accreditation is crucial when selecting a healthcare management program. Always check for programs that are recognized for their accreditation by cahme to ensure high educational standards and better career prospects. For nurses with time constraints, rn to bsn programs without clinicals offer a flexible pathway to earning a bachelor’s degree completely online.

With these options, pursuing a healthcare career has never been more accessible—providing flexible opportunities for both new students and working professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Bradley N. Gaynes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles