World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
40
Citations
9800
World Ranking
7984
National Ranking
3427

Terrence R. Oakes publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Terrence R. Oakes sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 90 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Terrence R. Oakes D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Terrence R. Oakes sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Terrence R. Oakes is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their research spans multiple domains including traumatic brain injury, medical imaging, and biomedical engineering. The subfields of epidemiology and biomedical engineering are prominently represented in their scholarly contributions.

Oakes's work frequently addresses topics such as:

  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Anatomy and Medical Technology
  • Medical Imaging and Analysis

Their recent publications include studies on brain imaging techniques and surgical guidance technologies. Notable papers include:

  • "A-178 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Findings Are Not Related to Cognitive Functioning in Service Members with Remote History of Traumatic Brain Injury" (2022), published in Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
  • "¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography findings are not related to cognitive functioning in service members with remote history of mild traumatic brain injury" (2022), published in Neuropsychology
  • "Scan, Aim, Go: A Compact Brain Drill Guide for Accelerating Minimally-Invasive Neurosurgeries" (2024), published in the Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • "Automated Intraprocedural Detection and Registration of Interventional Devices via Characteristic Fiducial Markers" (2025), published in the Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition

The primary venues where Terrence R. Oakes has published include:

  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
  • Neuropsychology

Collaboration is a significant aspect of Oakes's research activities. Frequent coauthors involved in their work include Sara M. Lippa, Chihwa Song, Grant Bonavia, John Ollinger, and Thomas Lilieholm. These collaborations span multiple papers focusing on brain injury and imaging technologies.

Best Publications

  • Anterior cingulate activity as a predictor of degree of treatment response in major depression: evidence from brain electrical tomography analysis.

    Diego Pizzagalli;Roberto D. Pascual-Marqui;Jack B. Nitschke;Terrence R. Oakes

  • Diffusion tensor imaging of the corpus callosum in Autism

    Andrew L. Alexander;Jee Eun Lee;Mariana Lazar;Rebecca Boudos

  • Orbitofrontal cortex tracks positive mood in mothers viewing pictures of their newborn infants.

    Jack B Nitschke;Eric E Nelson;Brett D Rusch;Andrew S Fox

  • Metabolic rate in the right amygdala predicts negative affect in depressed patients.

    Heather C. Abercrombie;Stacey M. Schaefer;Christine L. Larson;Terrence R. Oakes

  • Functional but not structural subgenual prefrontal cortex abnormalities in melancholia

    D A Pizzagalli;T R Oakes;A S Fox;M K Chung

  • Motion correction and the use of motion covariates in multiple-subject fMRI analysis

    Tom Johnstone;Kathleen S. Ores Walsh;Larry L. Greischar;Andrew L. Alexander

  • Amygdala volume and nonverbal social impairment in adolescent and adult males with autism.

    Brendon M. Nacewicz;Kim M. Dalton;Tom Johnstone;Micah T. Long

  • Coupling of theta activity and glucose metabolism in the human rostral anterior cingulate cortex: An EEG/PET study of normal and depressed subjects

    Diego A. Pizzagalli;Terrence R. Oakes;Richard J. Davidson

  • Glucose metabolic changes in the prefrontal cortex are associated with HPA axis response to a psychosocial stressor

    Simone Kern;Terrence R. Oakes;Charles K. Stone;Emelia M. McAuliff

  • Reliability and Precision of Pseudo-Continuous Arterial Spin Labeling Perfusion MRI on 3.0 T and Comparison With 15O-water PET in Elderly Subjects at Risk for Alzheimer's Disease

    Guofan Xu;Howard A. Rowley;Gaohong Wu;David C. Alsop

  • Integrating VBM into the General Linear Model with Voxelwise Anatomical Covariates

    Terrence R. Oakes;Andrew S. Fox;Tom Johnstone;Moo K. Chung

  • Functional coupling of simultaneous electrical and metabolic activity in the human brain

    Terrence R. Oakes;Diego A. Pizzagalli;Andrew M. Hendrick;Katherine A. Horras

  • A population-average MRI-based atlas collection of the rhesus macaque

    Donald G. McLaren;Kristopher J. Kosmatka;Terrance R. Oakes;Christopher D. Kroenke;Christopher D. Kroenke

  • Amygdalar and hippocampal substrates of anxious temperament differ in their heritability

    Jonathan A. Oler;Andrew S. Fox;Steven E. Shelton;Jeffrey Rogers;Jeffrey Rogers

  • Brain electrical tomography in depression: the importance of symptom severity, anxiety, and melancholic features.

    Diego A Pizzagalli;Jack B Nitschke;Terrence R Oakes;Andrew M Hendrick

  • Comparison of fMRI motion correction software tools.

    Terrence R. Oakes;Tom Johnstone;K. S. Ores Walsh;Lawrence L. Greischar

  • The voice of emotion: an FMRI study of neural responses to angry and happy vocal expressions

    Tom Johnstone;Carien M. van Reekum;Terrence R. Oakes;Richard J. Davidson

  • Brain Regions Associated with the Expression and Contextual Regulation of Anxiety in Primates

    Ned H. Kalin;Steven E. Shelton;Andrew S. Fox;Terrence R. Oakes

  • Hippocampal morphometry in depressed patients and control subjects: relations to anxiety symptoms

    Brett D Rusch;Heather C Abercrombie;Terrence R Oakes;Stacey M Schaefer

  • Trait-Like Brain Activity during Adolescence Predicts Anxious Temperament in Primates

    Andrew S. Fox;Steven E. Shelton;Terrence R. Oakes;Richard J. Davidson

  • Stability of amygdala BOLD response to fearful faces over multiple scan sessions

    Tom Johnstone;Leah H. Somerville;Andrew L. Alexander;Terrence R. Oakes

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard J. Davidson
Richard J. Davidson University of Wisconsin–Madison
Ned H. Kalin
Ned H. Kalin University of Wisconsin–Madison
Andrew S. Fox
Andrew S. Fox University of California, Davis
Steven E. Shelton
Steven E. Shelton University of Wisconsin–Madison
Tom Johnstone
Tom Johnstone Swinburne University of Technology
Bradley T. Christian
Bradley T. Christian University of Wisconsin–Madison
Andrew L. Alexander
Andrew L. Alexander University of Wisconsin–Madison
Christine L. Larson
Christine L. Larson University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
Louis M. French
Louis M. French United States Army Research Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience opens many doors to interdisciplinary careers. If you're interested in human behavior, mental health, or social work, several related online degrees offer specialized training and flexibility for working students.

For those drawn to therapy and counseling, a marriage and family therapist degree can prepare you to support families and couples navigating life's challenges. Alternatively, you might pursue a masters in psychology, which builds foundational knowledge in mental processes and opens pathways to research, assessment, and clinical roles.

If you're seeking affordability and convenience, many psychology degrees online are available from reputable universities. These programs often allow you to specialize in areas such as organizational, clinical, or educational psychology.

For a career in social work and community support, check out the easiest msw online program options. A Master of Social Work (MSW) helps you qualify for leadership roles and impactful work in various social service settings.

Best Scientists Citing Terrence R. Oakes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles