World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Steven A. Sloman

Steven A. Sloman

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
58
Citations
23767
World Ranking
3784
National Ranking
2118

Steven A. Sloman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven A. Sloman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 177 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Steven A. Sloman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven A. Sloman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1974 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation

Overview

Steven A. Sloman is affiliated with Brown University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Computer Science, with a significant focus on Artificial Intelligence. Their work also encompasses Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, and History and Philosophy of Science.

The central themes in Sloman's research involve Philosophy and History of Science, Climate Change Communication and Perception, COVID-19 and Mental Health, Embodied and Extended Cognition, Child and Animal Learning Development, Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment, and Social and Intergroup Psychology.

Sloman has published extensively in several academic venues. Notable frequent publication venues include arXiv (Cornell University), Cognition, Preprints.org, SSM - Population Health, and Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience.

Some of their recent papers are:

  • Gathering Strength, Gathering Storms: The One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence (AI100) 2021 Study Panel Report, 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Walking the party line: The growing role of political ideology in shaping health behavior in the United States, 2021, SSM - Population Health
  • Cognitive Neuroscience Meets the Community of Knowledge, 2021, Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
  • Evidence against risk as a motivating driver of COVID-19 preventive behaviors in the United States, 2021, Journal of Health Psychology
  • Is political extremism supported by an illusion of understanding?, 2022, Cognition

Frequent collaborators include Nathaniel Rabb, Jeffrey C. Zemla, Christos Bechlivanidis, David A. Lagnado, and Claude García.

In 1974, Sloman was recognized as a Fellow of the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation.

Best Publications

  • The empirical case for two systems of reasoning.

    Steven A. Sloman

  • The science of fake news

    David M. J. Lazer;Matthew A. Baum;Yochai Benkler;Adam J. Berinsky

  • Causal Models: How People Think About the World and Its Alternatives

    Steven A. Sloman

  • Two systems of reasoning.

    Steven A. Sloman

  • Feature-Based Induction.

    Steven A. Sloman

  • Motion events in language and cognition.

    Silvia P. Gennari;Steven A. Sloman;Barbara C. Malt;W. Tecumseh Fitch

  • Knowing versus Naming: Similarity and the Linguistic Categorization of Artifacts

    Barbara C. Malt;Steven A. Sloman;Silvia Gennari;Meiyi Shi

  • Base-rate respect: From ecological rationality to dual processes.

    Aron K. Barbey;Steven A. Sloman

  • Political Extremism Is Supported by an Illusion of Understanding

    Philip M. Fernbach;Todd Rogers;Craig R. Fox;Steven A. Sloman

  • Feature Centrality and Conceptual Coherence

    Steven A. Sloman;Bradley C. Love;Woo Kyoung Ahn

  • Comparing decision bound and exemplar models of categorization

    W. Todd Maddox;F. Gregory Ashby

  • The Advantage of Timely Intervention.

    David A. Lagnado;Steven Sloman

  • Frequency illusions and other fallacies

    Steven A. Sloman;David Over;Lila Slovak;Jeffrey M. Stibel

  • Similarity- versus rule-based categorization.

    Edward E. Smith;Steven A. Sloman

  • How bilinguals solve the naming problem

    Eef Ameel;Gert Storms;Barbara C. Malt;Steven A. Sloman

  • Forgetting in primed fragment completion.

    Steven A. Sloman;C. A. Gordon Hayman;Nobuo Ohta;Janine Law

  • The probability of causal conditionals.

    David E. Over;Constantinos Hadjichristidis;Jonathan St. B.T. Evans;Simon J. Handley

  • Causality in Thought

    Steven A. Sloman;David Lagnado

  • Beyond covariation: Cues to causal structure.

    DA Lagnado;Waldmann;Y Hagmaye;SA Sloman

  • Do We "do"?

    Steven A. Sloman;David A. Lagnado

Frequent Co-Authors

Barbara C. Malt
Barbara C. Malt Lehigh University
David A. Lagnado
David A. Lagnado University College London
David E. Over
David E. Over Durham University
Aron K. Barbey
Aron K. Barbey University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Miriam J. Metzger
Miriam J. Metzger University of California, Santa Barbara
Craig R. Fox
Craig R. Fox University of California, Los Angeles
Jonathan St. B. T. Evans
Jonathan St. B. T. Evans Plymouth University
Lance J. Rips
Lance J. Rips Northwestern University
Dan Sperber
Dan Sperber Central European University
Simon J. Handley
Simon J. Handley Macquarie University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in Psychology unlocks a wide range of online programs and diverse career paths. Many students choose to further specialize and pursue roles such as mental health counselors. Online psychology and counseling degrees are popular for their flexibility and wide acceptance among employers, but it’s important to understand state-specific requirements.

Each region has its own set of standards for licensure, coursework, and supervised clinical experience. For example, you can review the Buffalo mental health counselor certification requirements to see what’s needed in New York. In the Southwest, the Chandler mental health counselor education requirements differ to reflect Arizona’s regulations.

Those exploring opportunities in the Southeast should familiarize themselves with the Charlotte mental health counselor certification requirements. For those interested in public health roles in Virginia, learn more about the mental health counselor requirements in Chesapeake.

Understanding these requirements early helps you choose the right online program and prepares you for certification in your chosen location.

Best Scientists Citing Steven A. Sloman

Trending Scientists