World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
51
Citations
10284
World Ranking
5509
National Ranking
448

Mark Andrew Good publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Andrew Good sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 145 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Mark Andrew Good D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Andrew Good sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark Andrew Good is affiliated with Cardiff University in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to research in medicine, neuroscience, and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their research spans several subfields including physiology, molecular biology, public health, environmental and occupational health, genetics, and neurology.

The scientist's work covers a variety of interconnected main topics, such as:

  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Diet and metabolism studies
  • Genetics and neurodevelopmental disorders
  • Gut microbiota and health
  • Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration mechanisms

Several papers authored or co-authored by Mark Andrew Good include:

  • ACE2 activation protects against cognitive decline and reduces amyloid pathology in the Tg2576 mouse model of Alzheimer's disease, 2020, Acta Neuropathologica
  • A randomised controlled study shows supplementation of overweight and obese adults with lactobacilli and bifidobacteria reduces bodyweight and improves well-being, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Altered Hippocampal-Prefrontal Neural Dynamics in Mouse Models of Down Syndrome, 2020, Cell Reports
  • Retinal ganglion cell degeneration correlates with hippocampal spine loss in experimental Alzheimer's disease, 2020, Acta Neuropathologica Communications
  • The Impact of Probiotic Supplementation on Cognitive, Pathological and Metabolic Markers in a Transgenic Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Disease, 2022, Frontiers in Neuroscience

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers, including:

  • Victor L. J. Tybulewicz
  • Elizabeth Fisher
  • J. Scott Miners
  • Patrick G. Kehoe
  • Timothy R. Hughes

Mark Andrew Good publishes regularly in venues such as:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Acta Neuropathologica
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Scientific Reports
  • Cell Reports

Best Publications

  • Impaired synaptic plasticity and learning in aged amyloid precursor protein transgenic mice

    Paul F. Chapman;Gail L. White;Matthew W. Jones;Deirdre Cooper-Blacketer

  • Distinct components of spatial learning revealed by prior training and NMDA receptor blockade.

    D. M. Bannerman;M. A. Good;M. A. Good;S. P. Butcher;M. Ramsay

  • Double dissociation of function within the hippocampus: a comparison of dorsal, ventral, and complete hippocampal cytotoxic lesions.

    D. M. Bannerman;B. K. Yee;Mark Andrew Good;M. J. Heupel

  • Selective hippocampal lesions abolish the contextual specificity of latent inhibition and conditioning.

    Robert Colin Honey;Mark Andrew Good

  • Hippocampal lesions disrupt navigation based on cognitive maps but not heading vectors

    John M. Pearce;A. D. L. Roberts;Mark Andrew Good

  • Conditioning and contextual retrieval in hippocampal rats.

    Mark Andrew Good;Robert Colin Honey

  • Dissociable Effects of Selective Lesions to Hippocampal Subsystems on Exploratory Behavior, Contextual Learning, and Spatial Learning

    Mark Andrew Good;Robert Colin Honey

  • Hippocampal Lesions Disrupt an Associative Mismatch Process

    Robert Colin Honey;Andrew A. Watt;Mark Andrew Good

  • Cyclical changes in endogenous levels of oestrogen modulate the induction of LTD and LTP in the hippocampal CA1 region.

    Mark Andrew Good;Mark Day;Janice L. Muir

  • Double dissociation between hippocampal and prefrontal lesions on an operant delayed matching task and a water maze reference memory task

    Hazel L. Sloan;Mark Andrew Good;Stephen Bruce Dunnett

  • Identifying cortical inputs to the rat hippocampus that subserve allocentric spatial processes: A simple problem with a complex answer

    John Patrick Aggleton;Seralynne Denise Vann;Catherine J. P. Oswald;Mark Andrew Good

  • A Pathway-Specific Function for Different AMPA Receptor Subunits in Amygdala Long-Term Potentiation and Fear Conditioning

    Yann Humeau;Daniel Reisel;Alexander W. Johnson;Thilo Borchardt

  • Transfer of Spatial Behavior Between Different Environments: Implications for Theories of Spatial Learning and for the Role of the Hippocampus in Spatial Learning

    John Martindale Pearce;Mark Andrew Good;Peter M. Jones;Anthony McGregor

  • Potentiation, overshadowing, and blocking of spatial learning based on the shape of the environment.

    John Martindale Pearce;Moira Anne Graham;Mark Andrew Good;Peter M. Jones

  • Enhanced long-term and impaired short-term spatial memory in GluA1 AMPA receptor subunit knockout mice: evidence for a dual-process memory model.

    David J. Sanderson;Mark Andrew Good;Kathryn Skelton;Rolf Sprengel

  • Context- but not familiarity-dependent forms of object recognition are impaired following excitotoxic hippocampal lesions in rats.

    Mark Andrew Good;Philip Andrew Barnes;Victoria Ann Staal;Anthony McGregor

  • Influence of a beacon on spatial learning based on the shape of the test environment.

    John Martindale Pearce;Jasper Ward-Robinson;Mark Andrew Good;Clayton J. Fussell

  • The role of the GluR-A (GluR1) AMPA receptor subunit in learning and memory.

    David J. Sanderson;Mark A. Good;Peter H. Seeburg;Rolf Sprengel

  • The role of the entorhinal cortex in two forms of spatial learning and memory

    D. M. Bannerman;B. K. Yee;M. Lemaire;L. Wilbrecht

  • ACE2 activation protects against cognitive decline and reduces amyloid pathology in the Tg2576 mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease

    Charles E. Evans;James S. Miners;Giulia Piva;Christine L. Willis

  • Deletion of glutamate receptor-A (GluR-A) AMPA receptor subunits impairs one-trial spatial memory.

    David J. Sanderson;Alane Gray;A. W. Simon;Amy M. Taylor

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert Colin Honey
Robert Colin Honey Cardiff University
David M. Bannerman
David M. Bannerman University of Oxford
John M. Pearce
John M. Pearce Cardiff University
J. N. P. Rawlins
J. N. P. Rawlins University of Oxford
Richard G. M. Morris
Richard G. M. Morris University of Edinburgh
John Patrick Aggleton
John Patrick Aggleton Cardiff University
Elizabeth M. C. Fisher
Elizabeth M. C. Fisher University College London
Julian R. Marchesi
Julian R. Marchesi Imperial College London
Simon Killcross
Simon Killcross University of New South Wales
Stephanie Schorge
Stephanie Schorge University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Mark Andrew Good

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles