World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 50 2579 2330 199 181 97 7789

Martin Lowe publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Martin Lowe between 1994 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Martin Lowe published across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025, averaging 4.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2019. 13 of the 155 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2019. 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 4 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 4 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 9 publications
1994 2025

155 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Martin Lowe: publications per year, 1994 to 2025
Year Publications
1994 1
1995 2
1996 2
1997 2
1998 5
1999 0
2000 2
2001 1
2002 3
2003 1
2004 4
2005 6
2006 1
2007 4
2008 3
2009 7
2010 2
2011 6
2012 4
2013 3
2014 3
2015 8
2016 4
2017 11
2018 6
2019 15
2020 9
2021 10
2022 9
2023 8
2024 4
2025 9
Total 155
Download as CSV

Martin Lowe publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Lowe sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 97–106 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 97 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131 97
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Martin Lowe D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Lowe sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130 50
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Martin Lowe is affiliated with the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom. Their research spans several interconnected fields within biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine. The scientist's work has a significant focus on cell biology, molecular biology, physiology, surgery, and immunology.

Their research topics cover a range of areas including cellular transport and secretion, endoplasmic reticulum stress and disease, inflammasome and immune disorders, biomedical research and pathophysiology, pancreatic function and diabetes, retinal development and disorders, and heme oxygenase-1 and carbon monoxide.

Recent notable publications by Martin Lowe include:

  • The NLRP3-inflammasome as a sensor of organelle dysfunction (2020), The Journal of Cell Biology
  • Membrane trafficking in health and disease (2020), Disease Models & Mechanisms
  • PCYT2-regulated lipid biosynthesis is critical to muscle health and ageing (2023), Nature Metabolism
  • Disruptions in endocytic traffic contribute to the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome (2023), Science Signaling
  • Cell-Based Phenotypic Drug Screening Identifies Luteolin as Candidate Therapeutic for Nephropathic Cystinosis (2020), Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

Martin Lowe frequently publishes in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), The Journal of Cell Biology, Journal of Cell Science, Faculty Opinions - Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature, and Disease Models & Mechanisms.

Their collaboration network includes frequent co-authorships with Rebecca Yarwood, Anthony Jackson-Crawford, Paula I. Seoane, David Brough, and Rachel Lennon.

Best Publications

  • A Role for Giantin in Docking COPI Vesicles to Golgi Membranes

    Birte Sönnichsen;Martin Lowe;Tim Levine;Eija Jämsä

  • The coiled-coil membrane protein golgin-84 is a novel rab effector required for Golgi ribbon formation

    Aipo Diao;Dinah Rahman;Darryl J.C. Pappin;John Lucocq

  • Caspase-mediated cleavage of the stacking protein GRASP65 is required for Golgi fragmentation during apoptosis.

    Jon D. Lane;John Lucocq;James Pryde;Francis A. Barr

  • Lowe Syndrome Protein OCRL1 Interacts with Clathrin and Regulates Protein Trafficking between Endosomes and the Trans-Golgi Network

    Rawshan Choudhury;Aipo Diao;Fang Zhang;Evan Eisenberg

  • The mitotic phosphorylation cycle of the cis-Golgi matrix protein GM130.

    Martin Lowe;Nicholas K. Gonatas;Graham Warren

  • Membrane targeting and activation of the Lowe syndrome protein OCRL1 by rab GTPases.

    Noora Hyvola;Aipo Diao;Eddie McKenzie;Alison Skippen

  • Structure and Function of the Lowe Syndrome Protein OCRL1

    Martin Lowe

  • Golgins and GRASPs: holding the Golgi together.

    Irene Barinaga-Rementeria Ramirez;Martin Lowe

  • The localization of human cyclins B1 and B2 determines CDK1 substrate specificity and neither enzyme requires MEK to disassemble the Golgi apparatus

    Viji Mythily Draviam;Simona Orrechia;Martin Lowe;Ruggero Pardi

  • Structural organization of the Golgi apparatus

    Martin Lowe

  • Autophagosome-lysosome fusion triggers a lysosomal response mediated by TLR9 and controlled by OCRL.

    Maria Giovanna De Leo;Leopoldo Staiano;Mariella Vicinanza;Alessandro Luciani

  • Inheritance and biogenesis of organelles in the secretory pathway

    Martin Lowe;Francis A. Barr

  • In Vitro Assembly and Disassembly of Coatomer

    Martin Lowe;Thomas E. Kreis

  • The Cellular and Physiological Functions of the Lowe Syndrome Protein OCRL1

    Zenobia B Mehta;Zenobia B Mehta;Grzegorz Pietka;Martin Lowe

  • Dissecting the role of the ARF guanine nucleotide exchange factor GBF1 in Golgi biogenesis and protein trafficking.

    Tomasz Szul;Robert Grabski;Susan Lyons;Yuichi Morohashi

  • Regulation of membrane traffic in animal cells by COPI.

    Martin Lowe;Thomas E. Kreis

  • Dissociation of Coatomer from Membranes Is Required for Brefeldin A–induced Transfer of Golgi Enzymes to the Endoplasmic Reticulum

    Jochen Scheel;Rainer Pepperkok;Martin Lowe;Gareth Griffiths

  • The Golgin Family of Coiled-Coil Tethering Proteins

    Tomasz M. Witkos;Martin Lowe

  • The NLRP3-inflammasome as a sensor of organelle dysfunction.

    Paula I. Seoane;Paula I. Seoane;Bali Lee;Bali Lee;Christopher Hoyle;Christopher Hoyle;Shi Yu;Shi Yu

  • Membrane trafficking in health and disease.

    Rebecca Yarwood;John Hellicar;Philip G. Woodman;Martin Lowe

Frequent Co-Authors

Francis A. Barr
Francis A. Barr University of Oxford
Uwe Kornak
Uwe Kornak University of Göttingen
Alexander A. Mironov
Alexander A. Mironov University of Manchester
Ralph R. Isberg
Ralph R. Isberg Tufts University
John M. Lucocq
John M. Lucocq University of St Andrews
Eija Jokitalo
Eija Jokitalo University of Helsinki
Timothy P. Levine
Timothy P. Levine University College London
Philip L. Beales
Philip L. Beales University College London
Stefan Mundlos
Stefan Mundlos Max Planck Society

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Molecular Biology opens the door to multiple academic and career opportunities in the sciences and healthcare. Many students consider bsn to msn programs online when looking to bridge a background in biology or nursing into advanced roles in healthcare leadership and research.

Flexibility is crucial when pursuing higher education, especially for working professionals, parents, or those with military backgrounds. Enrolling at nonprofit online colleges ensures students receive an affordable, high-quality, and accredited education. Similarly, veteran friendly online colleges offer tailored support and resources, making it easier for military personnel, veterans, and their families to excel.

Those interested in the intersection of science and community wellbeing may also find value in related programs, such as msw online programs. These degrees prepare graduates for impactful roles where knowledge of biology and social work can make a difference in healthcare, policy, and advocacy sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Lowe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles