World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
57
Citations
9744
World Ranking
14019
National Ranking
5916

Carolyn E. Machamer publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carolyn E. Machamer sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 108 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Carolyn E. Machamer D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carolyn E. Machamer sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Carolyn E. Machamer is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in the United States. Their research spans the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a focus on several subfields including Infectious Diseases, Molecular Biology, Immunology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, and Surgery.

Their work includes topics such as SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research, Cell death mechanisms and regulation, COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies, Complement system in diseases, Cancer Mechanisms and Therapy, Melanoma and MAPK Pathways, and Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Carolyn E. Machamer include:

  • IgM anti-ACE2 autoantibodies in severe COVID-19 activate complement and perturb vascular endothelial function, 2022, JCI Insight
  • IgM autoantibodies recognizing ACE2 are associated with severe COVID-19, 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Dipyridamole Inhibits Lipogenic Gene Expression by Retaining SCAP-SREBP in the Endoplasmic Reticulum, 2020, Cell chemical biology
  • Evidence for the role of Rab11-positive recycling endosomes as intermediates in coronavirus egress from epithelial cells, 2022, Histochemistry and Cell Biology
  • Tumor MK2 transcript levels are associated with improved response to chemotherapy and patient survival in non-small cell lung cancer, 2023, Physiological Genomics

Frequently collaborating co-authors include Mahendra Damarla, Karthik Suresh, Othello Del Rosario, Medha Kallem, and Gayatri Singh.

Their publications frequently appear in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), JCI Insight, Cell chemical biology, Histochemistry and Cell Biology, and Physiological Genomics.

Best Publications

  • Caspase-2 Is Localized at the Golgi Complex and Cleaves Golgin-160 during Apoptosis

    Marie Mancini;Carolyn E. Machamer;Sophie Roy;Donald W. Nicholson

  • Assembly of vaccinia virus: role of the intermediate compartment between the endoplasmic reticulum and the Golgi stacks.

    B. Sodeik;R.W. Doms;M. Ericsson;G. Hiller

  • Infectious Bronchitis Virus E Protein Is Targeted to the Golgi Complex and Directs Release of Virus-Like Particles

    Emily Corse;Carolyn E. Machamer

  • The Coronavirus E Protein: Assembly and Beyond

    Travis R. Ruch;Carolyn E. Machamer

  • Privileged delivery of polymer nanoparticles to the perinuclear region of live cells via a non-clathrin, non-degradative pathway.

    Samuel K. Lai;Kaoru Hida;Stan T. Man;Clive Chen

  • A specific transmembrane domain of a coronavirus E1 glycoprotein is required for its retention in the Golgi region.

    C E Machamer;J K Rose

  • Efficient Export of the Vesicular Stomatitis Virus G Protein from the Endoplasmic Reticulum Requires a Signal in the Cytoplasmic Tail That Includes Both Tyrosine-based and Di-acidic Motifs

    Carolyn S. Sevier;Ora A. Weisz;Mollie Davis;Carolyn E. Machamer

  • A Golgi retention signal in a membrane-spanning domain of coronavirus E1 protein.

    A M Swift;C E Machamer

  • The cytoplasmic tail of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein contains a novel endoplasmic reticulum retrieval signal that binds COPI and promotes interaction with membrane protein

    Corrin E. McBride;Jie Li;Carolyn E. Machamer

  • Differential effects of mutations in three domains on folding, quaternary structure, and intracellular transport of vesicular stomatitis virus G protein.

    R W Doms;A Ruusala;C Machamer;J Helenius

  • Vesicular stomatitis virus G proteins with altered glycosylation sites display temperature-sensitive intracellular transport and are subject to aberrant intermolecular disulfide bonding.

    Carolyn E Machamer;J. K. Rose

  • Golgi structure in stress sensing and apoptosis.

    Stuart W. Hicks;Carolyn E. Machamer

  • A single N-linked oligosaccharide at either of the two normal sites is sufficient for transport of vesicular stomatitis virus G protein to the cell surface.

    Carolyn E. Machamer;Robert Z. Florkiewicz;John K. Rose

  • Oligomerization of a membrane protein correlates with its retention in the Golgi complex

    Ora A. Weisz;Ann M. Swift;Carolyn E. Machamer

  • Intracellular Targeting Signals Contribute to Localization of Coronavirus Spike Proteins near the Virus Assembly Site

    Erik Lontok;Emily Corse;Carolyn E. Machamer

  • Glycosylation allows cell-surface transport of an anchored secretory protein.

    Jun Lin Guan;Jun Lin Guan;Carolyn E. Machamer;John K. Rose

  • Biosynthesis and glycosylation of the invariant chain associated with HLA-DR antigens.

    C E Machamer;P Cresswell

  • The cytoplasmic tails of infectious bronchitis virus E and M proteins mediate their interaction

    Emily Corse;Carolyn E Machamer

  • Ultrastructure and Regulation of Lateralized Connexin43 in the Failing Heart

    Geoffrey G. Hesketh;Manish H. Shah;Manish H. Shah;Victoria L. Halperin;Carol A. Cooke

  • Effects of a sphingolipid synthesis inhibitor on membrane transport through the secretory pathway

    Anne G. Rosenwald;Carolyn E. Machamer;Richard E. Pagano

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Cresswell
Peter Cresswell Yale University
Antony Rosen
Antony Rosen Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Matthew B. Frieman
Matthew B. Frieman University of Maryland, Baltimore
Oliver Laeyendecker
Oliver Laeyendecker Johns Hopkins University
Larissa A. Shimoda
Larissa A. Shimoda Johns Hopkins University
Ronen Marmorstein
Ronen Marmorstein University of Pennsylvania
Livia Casciola-Rosen
Livia Casciola-Rosen Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Martin S. Taylor
Martin S. Taylor Harvard University
Jef D. Boeke
Jef D. Boeke New York University
Justin Hanes
Justin Hanes Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

With a background in Biology or Biochemistry, you can explore numerous opportunities in healthcare, technology, and research. One growing field is health information management, where professionals handle patient data, billing, and coding. If you’re interested in an accessible entry point to this sector, online programs are available for those seeking the most affordable online health information management degree options.

Medical billing and coding are pivotal roles within healthcare administration. Demand for these positions is strong, with a positive medical billing and coding outlook and growing opportunities in both hospitals and clinics. Those considering this path often wonder about rewards and future growth. According to national data, medical coding salary can increase with experience, specialization, and certification.

Earning a credential like ccs certification can also help boost your career prospects. This designation demonstrates advanced coding proficiency and can set you apart in the job market, especially if you wish to transition into higher-responsibility roles that utilize both your scientific background and technical skills.

Best Scientists Citing Carolyn E. Machamer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles