What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Gene
- Internal medicine
- DNA
Gap junction, Cell biology, Connexin, Biophysics and Mesenchymal stem cell are his primary areas of study.
His Gap junction research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Gating, Cell junction, Permeability, Anatomy and Conductance.
His Cell biology research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Cell culture and Transfection.
His research integrates issues of Cell and Second messenger system in his study of Connexin.
His work deals with themes such as Nanotechnology, Electrophysiology, Ion channel and Homomeric, which intersect with Biophysics.
The Mesenchymal stem cell study combines topics in areas such as Biological pacemaker, Extracellular matrix, Stem cell and Electronic pacemaker.
His most cited work include:
- Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells as a Gene Delivery System to Create Cardiac Pacemakers (268 citations)
- Gap Junctions in Vascular Tissues Evaluating the Role of Intercellular Communication in the Modulation of Vasomotor Tone (250 citations)
- Connexin-specific cell-to-cell transfer of short interfering RNA by gap junctions. (239 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His main research concerns Gap junction, Cell biology, Biophysics, Internal medicine and Connexin.
His work is dedicated to discovering how Gap junction, Conductance are connected with Analytical chemistry and Ion channel and other disciplines.
His studies in Cell biology integrate themes in fields like Cell culture, Transfection and Cartilage.
His research in Biophysics tackles topics such as Anatomy which are related to areas like Myocyte.
His Internal medicine study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Anesthesia, Endocrinology and Cardiology.
His Connexin research integrates issues from Mutation, Lucifer yellow, Patch clamp and Second messenger system.
He most often published in these fields:
- Gap junction (36.44%)
- Cell biology (27.13%)
- Biophysics (25.91%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2010-2020)?
- Cell biology (27.13%)
- Gap junction (36.44%)
- Connexin (19.03%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Peter R. Brink focuses on Cell biology, Gap junction, Connexin, Internal medicine and Biophysics.
His study in Cell biology is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both microRNA and Cartilage.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Conductance, Permeability and Second messenger system in addition to Gap junction.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Mutation, Xenopus, Patch clamp and Immunology.
His Internal medicine research includes themes of Endocrinology, In vivo and Cardiology.
Peter R. Brink has researched Biophysics in several fields, including HeLa, Nerve conduction velocity, Coupling and Syncytium.
Between 2010 and 2020, his most popular works were:
- Stimulating Cardiac Muscle by Light: Cardiac Optogenetics by Cell Delivery (153 citations)
- Increased Cell-Cell Coupling Increases Infarct Size and Does not Decrease Incidence of Ventricular Tachycardia in Mice. (123 citations)
- The road to biological pacing. (98 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Gene
- Internal medicine
- DNA
His primary areas of investigation include Cell biology, Gap junction, Connexin, Internal medicine and Cell.
The concepts of his Cell biology study are interwoven with issues in Microvesicles, Cytoskeleton and Small interfering RNA.
Peter R. Brink combines subjects such as Vinculin, Biophysics and Cartilage with his study of Gap junction.
His Biophysics research incorporates elements of Cell junction, Permeability and Second messenger system.
His studies deal with areas such as Mutation, Nonsyndromic deafness and Ichthyosis as well as Connexin.
His study explores the link between Internal medicine and topics such as Endocrinology that cross with problems in In vivo, Cardioprotection, Anesthesia and Biological pacemaker.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
