World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
95
Citations
31800
World Ranking
10100
National Ranking
5203

Clinton T. Rubin publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clinton T. Rubin sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 271 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Clinton T. Rubin D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clinton T. Rubin sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - Fellow, National Academy of Inventors

Overview

Clinton T. Rubin is affiliated with Stony Brook University in the United States. Their research primarily spans fields such as Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with additional focus on subfields including Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Oncology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, and Physiology.

The scientist's main research topics include:

  • Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
  • Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Bone Metabolism and Diseases
  • Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Bone health and treatments
  • Bone health and osteoporosis research

Frequent publication venues for Clinton T. Rubin include UNC Libraries, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Research Square, Bone Research, and Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology.

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Rubin include the following:

  • Mechanical suppression of breast cancer cell invasion and paracrine signaling to osteoclasts requires nucleo-cytoskeletal connectivity, 2020, Bone Research
  • Exercise to Mend Aged-tissue Crosstalk in Bone Targeting Osteoporosis & Osteoarthritis, 2021, Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology
  • Postural Stability in Obese Preoperative Bariatric Patients Using Static and Dynamic Evaluation, 2020, Obesity Facts
  • Suppression of cancer-associated bone loss through dynamic mechanical loading, 2021, Bone
  • Mechanical signal influence on mesenchymal stem cell fate is enhanced by incorporation of refractory periods into the loading regimen, 2020, UNC Libraries

Rubin collaborates regularly with several co-authors, including:

  • Janet Rubin
  • Gabriel M. Pagnotti
  • Gunes Uzer
  • Maya Styner
  • Buer Sen

In recognition of contributions made in their field, Clinton T. Rubin was named a Fellow of the National Academy of Inventors in 2017.

Best Publications

  • Regulation of bone formation by applied dynamic loads.

    Clinton T. Rubin;Lance E. Lanyon

  • Regulation of bone mass by mechanical strain magnitude

    Clinton T. Rubin;Lance E. Lanyon

  • Static vs dynamic loads as an influence on bone remodelling

    L.E. Lanyon;C.T. Rubin

  • Anabolism: Low mechanical signals strengthen long bones

    Clinton Rubin;A. Simon Turner;Steven Bain;Craig Mallinckrodt

  • Prevention of postmenopausal bone loss by a low-magnitude, high-frequency mechanical stimuli: a clinical trial assessing compliance, efficacy, and safety.

    Clinton T. Rubin;Robert Recker;Diane Cullen;John Ryaby

  • Osteoregulatory nature of mechanical stimuli: Function as a determinant for adaptive remodeling in bone

    Clinton T. Rubin;Lance E. Lanyon

  • Limb mechanics as a function of speed and gait: a study of functional strains in the radius and tibia of horse and dog

    C. T. Rubin;L. E. Lanyon

  • Molecular pathways mediating mechanical signaling in bone

    Janet Rubin;Clinton Rubin;Christopher Rae Jacobs

  • The use of low-intensity ultrasound to accelerate the healing of fractures.

    Clinton Rubin;Mark Bolander;John P. Ryaby;Michael Hadjiargyrou

  • Low magnitude mechanical loading is osteogenic in children with disabling conditions.

    Kate Ward;Chrissie Alsop;Janette Caulton;Clinton Rubin

  • Mechanical signals as anabolic agents in bone

    Engin Ozcivici;Yen Kim Luu;Ben Adler;Yi Xian Qin

  • Biology of bone and how it orchestrates the form and function of the skeleton.

    D W Sommerfeldt;C T Rubin

  • Quantifying the strain history of bone: spatial uniformity and self-similarity of low-magnitude strains.

    Susannah P Fritton;Kenneth J. McLeod;Clinton T Rubin

  • Low-Level, High-Frequency Mechanical Signals Enhance Musculoskeletal Development of Young Women With Low BMD

    Vicente Gilsanz;Tishya A L Wren;Monique Sanchez;Frederick Dorey

  • Dynamic strain similarity in vertebrates; an alternative to allometric limb bone scaling.

    Clinton T. Rubin;Lance E. Lanyon

  • Mechanical regulation of signaling pathways in bone.

    William R. Thompson;Clinton T. Rubin;Janet Rubin

  • Quantity and quality of trabecular bone in the femur are enhanced by a strongly anabolic, noninvasive mechanical intervention.

    Clinton Rubin;A. Simon Turner;Ralph Müller;Erik Mittra

  • The anabolic activity of bone tissue, suppressed by disuse, is normalized by brief exposure to extremely low-magnitude mechanical stimuli

    Clinton Rubin;Gang Xu;Stefan Judex

  • Mechanical strain, induced noninvasively in the high-frequency domain, is anabolic to cancellous bone, but not cortical bone

    C. Rubin;A.S. Turner;C. Mallinckrodt;C. Jerome

  • Low-magnitude mechanical signals that stimulate bone formation in the ovariectomized rat are dependent on the applied frequency but not on the strain magnitude.

    Stefan Judex;Xin Lei;Daniel Han;Clinton Rubin

Frequent Co-Authors

Douglas P. Kiel
Douglas P. Kiel Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Marian T. Hannan
Marian T. Hannan Harvard University
Lance E. Lanyon
Lance E. Lanyon Royal Veterinary College
Jay Magaziner
Jay Magaziner University of Maryland, Baltimore
Mary L. Bouxsein
Mary L. Bouxsein Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Lisa M. Miller
Lisa M. Miller Brookhaven National Laboratory
Farshid Guilak
Farshid Guilak Washington University in St. Louis
Sheryl Zimmerman
Sheryl Zimmerman University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Thomas D. Brown
Thomas D. Brown University of Iowa
Bruce A. Barton
Bruce A. Barton University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens doors to a variety of related online degrees and flexible career options. For those seeking a faster entry into the healthcare workforce, fastest LPN program options are now widely available online, helping you quickly become a Licensed Practical Nurse.

If you are interested in advanced nursing roles with a mental health focus, pursuing the fastest psychiatric nurse practitioner program online can accelerate your progress in this in-demand specialty. Many programs offer flexible formats that cater to working professionals or career changers.

For students drawn to leadership roles, an online health administration degree online equips you with essential management skills for running hospitals or clinics. Those aiming for senior healthcare management positions can benefit from choosing an affordable mha online program, which offers rigorous training without a heavy financial burden.

These online pathways offer flexibility, affordability, and practical experience, making them excellent alternatives or additions to traditional medical studies in the US.

Best Scientists Citing Clinton T. Rubin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles