World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 47 5916 5676 47 47 137 6339

Christina Biasi publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Christina Biasi between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Christina Biasi published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 6 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2022. 26 of the 180 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2022. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 3 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 21 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 16 publications
1996 2025

180 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Christina Biasi: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 2
1998 0
1999 0
2000 2
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 3
2006 1
2007 1
2008 3
2009 4
2010 3
2011 2
2012 7
2013 4
2014 6
2015 7
2016 11
2017 15
2018 10
2019 14
2020 13
2021 13
2022 21
2023 11
2024 10
2025 16
Total 180
Download as CSV

Christina Biasi publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christina Biasi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 137 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544 137
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Christina Biasi D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christina Biasi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275 47
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Christina Biasi is affiliated with the University of Eastern Finland in Finland and works primarily within the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences. Their research focuses significantly on atmospheric science, ecology, and global and planetary change, with additional interests spanning environmental chemistry and soil science.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Climate change and permafrost
  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Peatlands and wetlands ecology
  • Atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics
  • Methane hydrates and related phenomena
  • Geology and paleoclimatology research
  • Soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics

Biasi's notable recent papers illustrate a focus on biogeochemical cycles and ecosystem dynamics related to cold-region environments. These papers include:

  • Statistical upscaling of ecosystem CO2 fluxes across the terrestrial tundra and boreal domain: Regional patterns and uncertainties, 2021, published in Global Change Biology
  • Nitrous oxide emissions from permafrost-affected soils, 2020, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
  • Global patterns of nitrate isotope composition in rivers and adjacent aquifers reveal reactive nitrogen cascading, 2021, Communications Earth & Environment
  • Modeled Microbial Dynamics Explain the Apparent Temperature Sensitivity of Wetland Methane Emissions, 2020, Global Biogeochemical Cycles
  • Microbiome assembly in thawing permafrost and its feedbacks to climate, 2022, Global Change Biology

Frequent co-authors contributing to Biasi's research include:

  • Maija E. Marushchak
  • Carolina Voigt
  • Pertti J. Martikainen
  • Henri Siljanen
  • Anna-Maria Virkkala

Biasi's work is often published in several prolific venues such as Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Global Change Biology, Peer Community In Microbiology, Global Biogeochemical Cycles, and Environmental Research Letters. These venues reflect a broad engagement with environmental and biogeochemical research communities.

Best Publications

  • Potential carbon emissions dominated by carbon dioxide from thawed permafrost soils

    Christina Schädel;Martin K.-F. Bader;Edward A.G. Schuur;Christina Biasi

  • Warming of subarctic tundra increases emissions of all three important greenhouse gases – carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide

    Carolina Voigt;Richard E. Lamprecht;Maija E. Marushchak;Saara E. Lind

  • Large N2O emissions from cryoturbated peat soil in tundra

    Maija E. Repo;Sanna Susiluoto;Saara E. Lind;Simo Jokinen

  • Hot spots for nitrous oxide emissions found in different types of permafrost peatlands

    M. E. Marushchak;A. Pitkämäki;H. Koponen;C. Biasi

  • Contrasting denitrifier communities relate to contrasting N2O emission patterns from acidic peat soils in arctic tundra.

    Katharina Palmer;Christina Biasi;Marcus A Horn

  • Temperature‐dependent shift from labile to recalcitrant carbon sources of arctic heterotrophs

    Christina Biasi;Olga Rusalimova;Hildegard Meyer;Christina Kaiser

  • Statistical upscaling of ecosystem CO2 fluxes across the terrestrial tundra and boreal domain: Regional patterns and uncertainties

    Anna Maria Virkkala;Juha Aalto;Juha Aalto;Brendan M. Rogers;Torbern Tagesson;Torbern Tagesson

  • Increased nitrous oxide emissions from Arctic peatlands after permafrost thaw

    Carolina Voigt;Maija E. Marushchak;Richard E. Lamprecht;Marcin Jackowicz-Korczyński

  • Initial effects of experimental warming on carbon exchange rates, plant growth and microbial dynamics of a lichen-rich dwarf shrub tundra in Siberia

    Christina Biasi;Christina Biasi;Hildegard Meyer;Olga Rusalimova;Rainer Hämmerle

  • Nitrous oxide emissions from permafrost-affected soils

    Carolina Voigt;Maija E. Marushchak;Benjamin W. Abbott;Christina Biasi

  • A plant-microbe interaction framework explaining nutrient effects on primary production.

    Petr Čapek;Stefano Manzoni;Eva Kaštovská;Birgit Wild

  • Direct experimental evidence for the contribution of lime to CO2 release from managed peat soil

    Christina Biasi;Saara E. Lind;Niina M. Pekkarinen;Jari T. Huttunen

  • Interaction between tannins and fungal necromass stabilizes fungal residues in boreal forest soils.

    Bartosz Adamczyk;Outi-Maaria Sietiö;Christina Biasi;Jussi Heinonsalo;Jussi Heinonsalo

  • Conservation of soil organic matter through cryoturbation in arctic soils in Siberia

    Christina Kaiser;Hildegard Meyer;Christina Biasi;Olga Rusalimova

  • Microbiome assembly in thawing permafrost and its feedbacks to climate

    Unknown

  • Global patterns of nitrate isotope composition in rivers and adjacent aquifers reveal reactive nitrogen cascading

    Ioannis Matiatos;Leonard I. Wassenaar;Lucilena R. Monteiro;Jason J. Venkiteswaran

  • A review of the importance of mineral nitrogen cycling in the plant-soil-microbe system of permafrost-affected soils—changing the paradigm

    Unknown

  • Thawing Yedoma permafrost is a neglected nitrous oxide source

    Unknown

  • Modeled Microbial Dynamics Explain the Apparent Temperature Sensitivity of Wetland Methane Emissions

    Sarah E. Chadburn;Tuula Aalto;Mika Aurela;Dennis Baldocchi

  • Carbon dioxide balance of subarctic tundra from plot to regional scales

    M. E. Marushchak;I. Kiepe;C. Biasi;V. Elsakov

  • Ecosystem carbon response of an Arctic peatland to simulated permafrost thaw

    Carolina Voigt;Carolina Voigt;Maija E. Marushchak;Maija E. Marushchak;Mikhail Mastepanov;Mikhail Mastepanov;Richard E. Lamprecht

  • Cultivation of a perennial grass for bioenergy on a boreal organic soil – carbon sink or source?

    Narasinha J. Shurpali;Niina P. Hyvönen;Jari T. Huttunen;Robert J. Clement

  • Linking microbial community structure and allocation of plant-derived carbon in an organic agricultural soil using 13CO2 pulse-chase labelling combined with 13C-PLFA profiling

    Niina M. Tavi;Pertti J. Martikainen;Kwaku Lokko;Merja Kontro

Frequent Co-Authors

Pertti J. Martikainen
Pertti J. Martikainen University of Eastern Finland
Andreas Richter
Andreas Richter University of Bremen
Tarmo Virtanen
Tarmo Virtanen University of Helsinki
Benjamin W. Abbott
Benjamin W. Abbott Brigham Young University
Torben R. Christensen
Torben R. Christensen Aarhus University
Jukka Pumpanen
Jukka Pumpanen University of Eastern Finland
Hannu Nykänen
Hannu Nykänen University of Eastern Finland
Gustaf Hugelius
Gustaf Hugelius Stockholm University
Hana Šantrůčková
Hana Šantrůčková University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice
Thomas Friborg
Thomas Friborg University of Copenhagen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse career opportunities, often requiring interdisciplinary knowledge. For those looking to advance their expertise or shift into educational roles, exploring online edd no dissertation programs can be ideal. These pathways offer flexibility without the extensive commitment of a dissertation.

Educators seeking to elevate their qualifications might consider eds to edd bridge programs online, which provide a streamlined approach to doctoral studies. This is especially useful for professionals aiming to merge environmental knowledge with leadership roles.

For those interested in social aspects of environmental work, affordable doctorates in social work can enhance one’s ability to address community impact and policy. The cheapest dsw program options offer cost-effective routes to this specialization.

Additionally, pursuing broader educational goals through best affordable online general studies degree programs can provide foundational knowledge adaptable to various environmental careers.

Best Scientists Citing Christina Biasi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles