World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
David J. Sanderson

David J. Sanderson

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
46
Citations
7621
World Ranking
6720
National Ranking
521

David J. Sanderson publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David J. Sanderson sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 116 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

David J. Sanderson D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David J. Sanderson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Hippocampal synaptic plasticity, spatial memory and anxiety

    David M. Bannerman;Rolf Sprengel;David J. Sanderson;Stephen B. McHugh

  • Contribution of Hippocampal and Extra-Hippocampal NR2B-Containing NMDA Receptors to Performance on Spatial Learning Tasks

    Jakob von Engelhardt;Beril Doganci;Beril Doganci;Vidar Jensen;Øivind Hvalby

  • Systemic inflammation induces acute working memory deficits in the primed brain: relevance for delirium

    C. Murray;D.J. Sanderson;C. Barkus;R.M.J. Deacon

  • NMDA receptor subunit NR2A is required for rapidly acquired spatial working memory but not incremental spatial reference memory.

    David M. Bannerman;Burkhard Niewoehner;Louisa Lyon;Carola Romberg

  • Can prepared responses be stored subcortically

    Anthony N. Carlsen;Romeo Chua;J. Timothy Inglis;David J. Sanderson

  • Prepared movements are elicited early by startle.

    Anthony N. Carlsen;Romeo Chua;J. Timothy Inglis;David J. Sanderson

  • Rapid neck muscle adaptation alters the head kinematics of aware and unaware subjects undergoing multiple whiplash-like perturbations

    Gunter P Siegmund;David J Sanderson;Barry S Myers;J Timothy Inglis

  • Malaise in the water maze: Untangling the effects of LPS and IL-1β on learning and memory

    Colm Cunningham;David J. Sanderson

  • Awareness affects the response of human subjects exposed to a single whiplash-like perturbation.

    Gunter P. Siegmund;David J. Sanderson;Barry S. Myers;J. Timothy Inglis

  • Dissecting spatial knowledge from spatial choice by hippocampal NMDA receptor deletion

    David M Bannerman;Thorsten Bus;Amy Taylor;David J Sanderson

  • Enhanced long-term and impaired short-term spatial memory in GluA1 AMPA receptor subunit knockout mice: evidence for a dual-process memory model.

    David J. Sanderson;Mark Andrew Good;Kathryn Skelton;Rolf Sprengel

  • Adaptations to normal human gait on potentially slippery surfaces: the effects of awareness and prior slip experience.

    Tamika L. Heiden;David J. Sanderson;J. Timothy Inglis;Gunter P. Siegmund

  • The role of the GluR-A (GluR1) AMPA receptor subunit in learning and memory.

    David J. Sanderson;Mark A. Good;Peter H. Seeburg;Rolf Sprengel

  • Worsening Cognitive Impairment and Neurodegenerative Pathology Progressively Increase Risk for Delirium

    Daniel H.J. Davis;Donal T. Skelly;Carol Murray;Edel Hennessy

  • Startle response of human neck muscles sculpted by readiness to perform ballistic head movements

    Gunter P. Siegmund;J. Timothy Inglis;David J. Sanderson

  • Age-dependent and -independent behavioral deficits in Tg2576 mice.

    R.M.J. Deacon;L.L. Cholerton;K. Talbot;R.G. Nair-Roberts

  • Deletion of glutamate receptor-A (GluR-A) AMPA receptor subunits impairs one-trial spatial memory.

    David J. Sanderson;Alane Gray;A. W. Simon;Amy M. Taylor

  • The role of habituation in hippocampus-dependent spatial working memory tasks: evidence from GluA1 AMPA receptor subunit knockout mice.

    David J Sanderson;David M Bannerman

  • Do GluA1 knockout mice exhibit behavioral abnormalities relevant to the negative or cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder

    Chris Barkus;Michael Feyder;Carolyn Graybeal;Tara Wright

  • What causes aberrant salience in schizophrenia? A role for impaired short-term habituation and the GRIA1 (GluA1) AMPA receptor subunit

    C Barkus;D J Sanderson;J N P Rawlins;M E Walton

Frequent Co-Authors

David M. Bannerman
David M. Bannerman University of Oxford
Colm Cunningham
Colm Cunningham Trinity College Dublin
J. N. P. Rawlins
J. N. P. Rawlins University of Oxford
Mark Andrew Good
Mark Andrew Good Cardiff University
Paul J. Harrison
Paul J. Harrison University of Oxford
John Patrick Aggleton
John Patrick Aggleton Cardiff University
Robert M. J. Deacon
Robert M. J. Deacon University of Oxford
Madeline J. Eacott
Madeline J. Eacott University of Essex
John M. Pearce
John M. Pearce Cardiff University
Vidar Jensen
Vidar Jensen University of Oslo

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing David J. Sanderson

Recently Published Articles