World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
R. Frederick Westbrook

R. Frederick Westbrook

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
39
Citations
6812
World Ranking
8541
National Ranking
502

R. Frederick Westbrook publications per year

1969: 1 publications 1970: 2 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 2 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publications 1985: 1 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 1 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 16 publications
1969 2025

193 publications in total across all disciplines

R. Frederick Westbrook publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R. Frederick Westbrook sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 123 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

R. Frederick Westbrook D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R. Frederick Westbrook sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

R. Frederick Westbrook is affiliated with the University of New South Wales in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience, with an emphasis on understanding the mechanisms underlying memory, neural processes, and behavior. The scientist's work covers a range of subfields including cognitive neuroscience, cellular and molecular neuroscience, behavioral neuroscience, molecular biology, and neurology.

The main topics of Westbrook's research encompass:

  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Gut microbiota and health
  • Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Diet and metabolism studies

Westbrook's publications appear frequently in several venues, including:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Neuroscience
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Learning and Cognition
  • eLife
  • Neurobiology of Learning and Memory

Recent significant papers authored or co-authored by Westbrook include:

  • "Reward-related attentional capture and cognitive inflexibility interact to determine greater severity of compulsivity-related problems," 2020, Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
  • "Intermittent cafeteria diet identifies fecal microbiome changes as a predictor of spatial recognition memory impairment in female rats," 2020, Translational Psychiatry
  • "Acquisition and extinction of second-order context conditioned fear: Role of the amygdala," 2021, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
  • "The neural substrates of higher-order conditioning: A review," 2022, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • "Male Rat Offspring Are More Impacted by Maternal Obesity Induced by Cafeteria Diet than Females-Additive Effect of Postweaning Diet," 2022, International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Westbrook often collaborates with a group of co-authors, including:

  • Nathan M. Holmes
  • Margaret J. Morris
  • Nadeem O. Kaakoush
  • Simon Killcross
  • Vincent Laurent

Best Publications

  • The formalin test: scoring properties of the first and second phases of the pain response in rats

    Frances V. Abbott;Keith B.J. Franklin;R.Frederick Westbrook

  • Contextual and Temporal Modulation of Extinction: Behavioral and Biological Mechanisms.

    Mark E. Bouton;R. Frederick Westbrook;Kevin A. Corcoran;Stephen Maren

  • Inactivation of the infralimbic but not the prelimbic cortex impairs consolidation and retrieval of fear extinction.

    Vincent Laurent;R. Frederick Westbrook

  • Why is obesity such a problem in the 21st century? The intersection of palatable food, cues and reward pathways, stress, and cognition

    Margaret J. Morris;Jessica E. Beilharz;Jayanthi Maniam;Amy C. Reichelt

  • Effects of recent exposure to a conditioned stimulus on extinction of Pavlovian fear conditioning.

    Wan Yee Macy Chan;Hiu T. Leung;R. Frederick Westbrook;Gavan P. McNally

  • Reinstatement of fear to an extinguished conditioned stimulus: two roles for context

    R. Frederick Westbrook;Mihaela Iordanova;Gavan McNally;Rick Richardson

  • Distinct contributions of the basolateral amygdala and the medial prefrontal cortex to learning and relearning extinction of context conditioned fear.

    Vincent Laurent;R. Frederick Westbrook

  • Psychological and neural mechanisms of experimental extinction: a selective review.

    Andrew R. Delamater;Andrew R. Delamater;R. Frederick Westbrook

  • The basolateral amygdala is necessary for learning but not relearning extinction of context conditioned fear

    Vincent Laurent;Alain R. Marchand;R. Frederick Westbrook

  • Contextual control over conditioned responding in a latent inhibition paradigm.

    R. Frederick Westbrook;Megan L. Jones;Glynis K. Bailey;Justin A. Harris

  • Predicting danger: The nature, consequences, and neural mechanisms of predictive fear learning

    Gavan P. McNally;R. Frederick Westbrook

  • Opioid receptors regulate the extinction of Pavlovian fear conditioning.

    Gavan P. McNally;R. Frederick Westbrook

  • Blockade of dopamine activity in the nucleus accumbens impairs learning extinction of conditioned fear

    Orit Holtzman-Assif;Vincent Laurent;R. Frederick Westbrook

  • Facial emotion recognition deficits following moderate-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI): Re-examining the valence effect and the role of emotion intensity

    Hannah Rosenberg;Skye McDonald;Marie Dethier;Roy P.C. Kessels

  • Age-specific effects of voluntary exercise on memory and the older brain.

    Joyce Siette;Joyce Siette;R. Frederick Westbrook;Carl Cotman;Kuldip Sidhu

  • The effect of high fat, high sugar, and combined high fat-high sugar diets on spatial learning and memory in rodents: A meta-analysis.

    Kirsten N. Abbott;Christopher K. Arnott;R. Frederick Westbrook;Dominic M.D. Tran

  • Behavioural neuroscience: The circuit of fear.

    Pankaj Sah;R. Frederick Westbrook

  • Oxytocin signaling in basolateral and central amygdala nuclei differentially regulates the acquisition, expression, and extinction of context-conditioned fear in rats.

    Emma J. Campbell-Smith;Nathan M. Holmes;Nura W. Lingawi;Marios C. Panayi

  • Spontaneous recovery of extinguished fear responses deepens their extinction: A role for error-correction mechanisms.

    Hiu Tin Leung;R. Frederick Westbrook

  • Persistence of preference for a flavor presented in simultaneous compound with sucrose.

    Justin A. Harris;Fiona L. Shand;Louisa Q. Carroll;R. Frederick Westbrook

  • Opioid Receptors in the Nucleus Accumbens Regulate Attentional Learning in the Blocking Paradigm

    Mihaela D. Iordanova;Gavan P. McNally;R. Frederick Westbrook

  • The basolateral amygdala is critical for learning about neutral stimuli in the presence of danger, and the perirhinal cortex is critical in the absence of danger.

    Nathan M Holmes;Shauna L Parkes;A Simon Killcross;R Frederick Westbrook

Frequent Co-Authors

Gavan P. McNally
Gavan P. McNally University of New South Wales
Justin A. Harris
Justin A. Harris University of Sydney
Rick Richardson
Rick Richardson University of New South Wales
Skye McDonald
Skye McDonald University of New South Wales
Mark E. Bouton
Mark E. Bouton University of Vermont
Fiona Shand
Fiona Shand University of New South Wales
Lee-Fay Low
Lee-Fay Low University of Sydney
Roy P.C. Kessels
Roy P.C. Kessels Radboud University
Rosa M. Escorihuela
Rosa M. Escorihuela Autonomous University of Barcelona
Simon Killcross
Simon Killcross University of New South Wales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens up a variety of career pathways. Choosing the right program is important, especially with many schools offering specialized and flexible learning options.

When comparing options, it’s essential to consider factors like program reputation, graduate outcomes, and regional opportunities. For example, you can review the most valuable psychology degrees in St. Louis to find top-performing colleges in that area. In the southeast, you may want to explore the most valuable psychology degrees in South Carolina and see which universities offer the best return on investment.

Students considering opportunities in Florida can investigate the most valuable psychology degree programs ranking in Tampa to identify strong local programs with excellent career support. Broader national insights are available in the most valuable psychology degrees in the US guide. These listings can help you match your academic goals with future career prospects in clinical practice, counseling, research, education, and more.

Whether you pursue an online degree regionally or nationally, researching the value and pathways of each program is key for long-term career success.

Best Scientists Citing R. Frederick Westbrook

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles