World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 42 7601 7090 87 86 98 6713

Rosa M. Escorihuela publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rosa M. Escorihuela between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rosa M. Escorihuela published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 3.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 1992. 4 of the 128 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 1992. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 4 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 12 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 10 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 4 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 6 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 4 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 1 publication
1988 2025

128 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rosa M. Escorihuela: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 1
1990 4
1991 5
1992 12
1993 3
1994 8
1995 10
1996 4
1997 3
1998 9
1999 1
2000 4
2001 2
2002 7
2003 2
2004 0
2005 0
2006 1
2007 2
2008 3
2009 5
2010 0
2011 5
2012 5
2013 1
2014 6
2015 3
2016 1
2017 4
2018 0
2019 0
2020 2
2021 4
2022 4
2023 2
2024 3
2025 1
Total 128
Download as CSV

Rosa M. Escorihuela publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rosa M. Escorihuela sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 98 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 98
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Rosa M. Escorihuela D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rosa M. Escorihuela sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 42
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Rosa M. Escorihuela is affiliated with the Autonomous University of Barcelona in Spain and has contributed extensively to the fields of medicine, with a particular focus on physiology, public health, environmental and occupational health, endocrine and autonomic systems, clinical psychology, and nutrition and dietetics.

Their research addresses several interrelated topics, including diet and metabolism studies, regulation of appetite and obesity, adipose tissue and metabolism, biochemical analysis and sensing techniques, fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome research, heart rate variability and autonomic control, and consumer attitudes and food labeling.

Their notable recent publications include:

  • Reduced heart rate variability predicts fatigue severity in individuals with chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis, 2020, Journal of Translational Medicine
  • Dissecting ultra-processed foods and drinks: Do they have a potential to impact the brain?, 2022, Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
  • Ultra-Processed Foods and Drinks Consumption Is Associated with Psychosocial Functioning in Adolescents, 2022, Nutrients
  • Analysis of Gender Differences in HRV of Patients with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Using Mobile-Health Technology, 2021, Sensors
  • A restricted cafeteria diet ameliorates biometric and metabolic profile in a rat diet-induced obesity model, 2021, International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition

Frequent co-authors include Montserrat Solanas, Alex Subias-Gusils, A. Alvarez, Antoni Caimari, and Noemí Boqué, reflecting ongoing collaborative efforts within these research domains.

The scientist's work has been published repeatedly in several journals, highlighting recurring venues such as:

  • Nutrients
  • Metabolites
  • Journal of Translational Medicine
  • Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
  • Sensors

Best Publications

  • Hyperalgesia, anxiety, and decreased hypoxic neuroprotection in mice lacking the adenosine A1 receptor

    Björn Johansson;Linda Halldner;Thomas V. Dunwiddie;Susan A. Masino

  • A behavioral assessment of Ts65Dn mice: a putative Down syndrome model

    Rosa M. Escorihuela;Alberto Fernández-Teruel;Iria F. Vallina;Carmela Baamonde

  • Inbred Roman High- and Low-Avoidance Rats: Differences in Anxiety, Novelty-Seeking, and Shuttlebox Behaviors

    R.M Escorihuela;A Fernández-Teruel;L Gil;R Aguilar

  • Neonatal Handling and Environmental Enrichment Effects on Emotionality, Novelty/Reward Seeking, and Age-Related Cognitive and Hippocampal Impairments: Focus on the Roman Rat Lines

    A. Fernández-Teruel;R. M. Escorihuela;B. Castellano;B. González

  • Mice lacking the adenosine A1 receptor are anxious and aggressive, but are normal learners with reduced muscle strength and survival rate

    Lydia Giménez-Llort;Alberto Fernández-Teruel;Rosa Maria Escorihuela;Bertil B. Fredholm

  • Early-life handling stimulation and environmental enrichment: are some of their effects mediated by similar neural mechanisms?

    Alberto Fernández-Teruel;Lydia Giménez-Llort;Rosa M. Escorihuela;Luis Gil

  • Impaired short- and long-term memory in Ts65Dn mice, a model for Down syndrome

    Rosa M Escorihuela;Iria F Vallina;Carmen Martı́nez-Cué;Carmela Baamonde

  • Long-term neuroendocrine and behavioural effects of a single exposure to stress in adult animals.

    Antonio Armario;Rosa M. Escorihuela;Roser Nadal

  • Genetic Selection and Differential Stress Responses : The Roman Lines/Strains of Rats

    P. Driscoll;R.M. Escorihuela;A. Fernández-Teruel;A. Fernández-Teruel;O. Giorgi

  • A quantitative trait locus influencing anxiety in the laboratory rat.

    Alberto Fernández-Teruel;Rosa M. Escorihuela;Jeffrey A. Gray;Raúl Aguilar

  • Effects of Postnatal Handling of Rats on Emotional, HPA-Axis, and Prolactin Reactivity to Novelty and Conflict

    Juan Francisco Núñez;Pilar Ferré;Rosa María Escorihuela;Adolf Tobeña

  • Neurophysiological and epigenetic effects of physical exercise on the aging process.

    Perla Kaliman;Marcelina Párrizas;Jaume F. Lalanza;Antoni Camins

  • The early acquisition of two-way (shuttle-box) avoidance as an anxiety-mediated behavior: Psychopharmacological validation

    A. FernÁndez-Teruel;R.M. Escorihuela;J.F. Núñez;A. Zapata

  • Enduring effects of environmental enrichment on novelty seeking, saccharin and ethanol intake in two rat lines (RHA/Verh and RLA/Verh) differing in incentive-seeking behavior.

    A Fernández-Teruel;P Driscoll;L Gil;R Aguilar

  • Environmental enrichment and postnatal handling prevent spatial learning deficits in aged hypoemotional (Roman high-avoidance) and hyperemotional (Roman low-avoidance) rats.

    R M Escorihuela;A Tobeña;A Fernández-Teruel

  • Enduring effects of environmental enrichment from weaning to adulthood on pituitary-adrenal function, pre-pulse inhibition and learning in male and female rats.

    Yolanda Peña;Margarita Prunell;David Rotllant;Antonio Armario

  • Early stimulation effects on novelty-induced behavior in two psychogenetically-selected rat lines with divergent emotionality profiles

    A Fernández-Teruel;R.M Escorihuela;J.F Núñez;M Gomà

  • Behavior of the Roman-Verh high- and low- avoidance rat lines in anxiety tests: relationship with defecation and self-grooming

    P. Ferré;A. Fernández-Teruel;R.M. Escorihuela;P. Driscoll

  • Long-term treadmill exercise induces neuroprotective molecular changes in rat brain

    S. Bayod;J. del Valle;A. M. Canudas;J. F. Lalanza

  • Environmental enrichment reverses the detrimental action of early inconsistent stimulation and increases the beneficial effects of postnatal handling on shuttlebox learning in adult rats.

    Rosa M. Escorihuela;Adolf Tobeña;Albert Fernández-Teruel

  • A quantitative trait locus influencing anxiety in the laboratory rat

    J Flint;A Fernandez-Teruel;R M Escorihuela;J A Gray

Frequent Co-Authors

Alberto Fernández-Teruel
Alberto Fernández-Teruel Autonomous University of Barcelona
Mercè Pallàs
Mercè Pallàs University of Barcelona
Jonathan Flint
Jonathan Flint University of California, Los Angeles
Antoni Camins
Antoni Camins University of Barcelona
Rafael Torrubia
Rafael Torrubia Autonomous University of Barcelona
Gerard R. Dawson
Gerard R. Dawson P1vital LTD
Berta González
Berta González Autonomous University of Barcelona
Mara Dierssen
Mara Dierssen Centre for Genomic Regulation
Lluís Arola
Lluís Arola Rovira i Virgili University
Bertil B. Fredholm
Bertil B. Fredholm Karolinska Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens doors to various rewarding career paths, notably in counseling and mental health services. One fast-growing field is substance abuse counseling, where professionals help individuals overcome addiction and build healthier lives.

Becoming a counselor typically requires a specialized degree, state-specific certifications, and field experience. For example, understanding the substance abuse counselor requirements in Anchorage can guide students considering careers in Alaska. Similarly, those interested in other locations can review the steps for becoming a substance abuse counselor in Arlington or explore the Atlanta substance abuse counselor certification requirements. Each region may have unique educational and licensing standards to meet.

With flexible online degree options, students can prepare for careers almost anywhere. If you’re looking for another example, consider the pathway of becoming a substance abuse counselor in Aurora. Assess your career interests to pick the right program and location—each step can help you make a difference with the knowledge and credentials you gain.

Best Scientists Citing Rosa M. Escorihuela

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles