World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 43 4327 3996 726 670 188 10371

Jonathan Grant publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jonathan Grant between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jonathan Grant published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 6.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2011. 17 of the 234 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2011. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 6 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 8 publications
1992 2025

234 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jonathan Grant: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 1
1994 2
1995 0
1996 0
1997 3
1998 2
1999 3
2000 2
2001 2
2002 1
2003 6
2004 9
2005 9
2006 12
2007 11
2008 12
2009 8
2010 5
2011 18
2012 6
2013 15
2014 12
2015 15
2016 13
2017 9
2018 9
2019 4
2020 7
2021 4
2022 14
2023 2
2024 9
2025 8
Total 234
Download as CSV

Jonathan Grant publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan Grant sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 184–193 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 188 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319 188
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Jonathan Grant D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan Grant sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300 43
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Jonathan Grant is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom. Their research contributions are primarily situated within the field of Medicine, encompassing 20 publications in this domain.

The scientist's work spans several subfields of study, including:

  • Genetics (9 publications)
  • Economics and Econometrics (8 publications)
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (8 publications)
  • General Health Professions (7 publications)
  • Surgery (6 publications)

Jonathan Grant's main research topics cover a diverse range of areas such as:

  • Scientometrics and bibliometrics research (12 publications)
  • Genomics and Rare Diseases (8 publications)
  • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (6 publications)
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 publications)
  • Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (4 publications)
  • Innovation Policy and R&D (4 publications)
  • Health Policy Implementation Science (4 publications)

They have published frequently in certain venues, including:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) with 5 publications
  • Health Research Policy and Systems with 3 publications
  • F1000Research with 3 publications
  • Journal of Diabetes with 3 publications
  • Genetics in Medicine with 2 publications

Key recent papers authored or co-authored by Jonathan Grant include:

  • From COVID-19 research to vaccine application: why might it take 17 months not 17 years and what are the wider lessons? (2020, Health Research Policy and Systems)
  • A simplified (modified) Duke Activity Status Index (M-DASI) to characterise functional capacity: a secondary analysis of the Measurement of Exercise Tolerance before Surgery (METS) study (2020, British Journal of Anaesthesia)
  • Using Policy Labs as a process to bring evidence closer to public policymaking: a guide to one approach (2020, Palgrave Communications)
  • The Inequities of Mental Health Research (IAMHRF) (2020, OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University))
  • Fundamental challenges in assessing the impact of research infrastructure (2021, Health Research Policy and Systems)

Jonathan Grant's collaboration network includes frequent co-authors such as Alice Garrett, Sophie Allen, Miranda Durkie, George J. Burghel, and Rachel Robinson, each of whom has co-authored 11 papers with them.

Best Publications

  • The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research:

    Zoë Slote Morris;Steven Wooding;Jonathan Grant

  • How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set

    Iain Chalmers;Michael B Bracken;Ben Djulbegovic;Silvio Garattini

  • How long does biomedical research take? Studying the time taken between biomedical and health research and its translation into products, policy, and practice

    Stephen R Hanney;Sophie Castle-Clarke;Jonathan Grant;Jonathan Grant;Susan Guthrie

  • Evaluating "payback" on biomedical research from papers cited in clinical guidelines: applied bibliometric study.

    Jonathan Grant;Robert Cottrell;Françoise Cluzeau;Gail Fawcett

  • Low Fertility and Population Ageing

    Jonathan Grant;Stijn Hoorens;Suja Sivadasan;Mirjam van het Loo

  • Low fertility and population ageing: causes consequences and policy options.

    Jonathan Grant;Stijn Hoorens;Suja Sivadasan;Mirjam van het Loo

  • Basic research and health: a reassessment of the scientific basis for the support of biomedical science

    Jonathan Grant;Liz Green;Barbara Mason

  • Proposed methods for reviewing the outcomes of health research: the impact of funding by the UK's 'Arthritis Research Campaign'

    Stephen R Hanney;Jonathan Grant;Steven Wooding;Martin J Buxton

  • The comparative role of consanguinity in infant and childhood mortality in Pakistan

    Jonathan Grant;AH Bittles

  • Does inbreeding lead to decreased human fertility

    AH Bittles;Jonathan Grant;Sian Sullivan;Rohanah Hussain

  • A global call for action to include gender in research impact assessment

    Pavel V. Ovseiko;Trisha Greenhalgh;Paula Adam;Jonathan Grant

  • Estimating the returns to United Kingdom publicly funded musculoskeletal disease research in terms of net value of improved health outcomes

    Matthew Glover;Erin Montague;Alexandra Pollitt;Susan Guthrie

  • ISRIA statement: ten-point guidelines for an effective process of research impact assessment

    Paula Adam;Pavel V. Ovseiko;Jonathan Grant;Kathryn E. A. Graham

  • Payback arising from research funding: evaluation of the Arthritis Research Campaign.

    Steven Wooding;Stephen Hanney;Martin Buxton;Jonathan Grant

  • Women and academic medicine: a review of the evidence on female representation:

    Maryse Penny;Rosanna Jeffries;Jonathan Grant;Sally C Davies

  • Do patients always prefer quicker treatment?: a discrete choice analysis of patients' stated preferences in the London Patient Choice Project

    Peter Burge;Nancy Devlin;John Appleby;Charlene Rohr

  • Estimating the returns to UK publicly funded cancer-related research in terms of the net value of improved health outcomes.

    Matthew Glover;Martin Buxton;Susan Guthrie;Stephen Hanney

  • Measuring research: A guide to research evaluation frameworks and tools

    Susan Guthrie;Watu Wamae;Stephanie Diepeveen;Steven Wooding

  • Quantifying the economic impact of government and charity funding of medical research on private research and development funding in the United Kingdom

    Jon Sussex;Yan Feng;Jorge Mestre-Ferrandiz;Michele Pistollato

  • Medical Research: What's It Worth? Estimating the Economic Benefits from Medical Research in the UK

    Martin Buxton;Stephen Hanney;Steve Morris;Leonie Sundmacher

  • The nature, scale and beneficiaries of research impact: An initial analysis of the Research Excellence Framework (REF) 2014 impact case studies

    Jonathan Grant;Saba Hinrichs

  • The nature, scale and beneficiaries of research impact

    Jonathan Grant;Saba Hinrichs;Alastair Gill;Jonathan Adams

Frequent Co-Authors

Alan H. Bittles
Alan H. Bittles Edith Cowan University
Keith M. Channon
Keith M. Channon University of Oxford
Alastair M. Buchan
Alastair M. Buchan University of Oxford
Graham Thornicroft
Graham Thornicroft King's College London
Graham M. Lord
Graham M. Lord University of Manchester
Nancy Devlin
Nancy Devlin University of Melbourne
Iain Chalmers
Iain Chalmers University of Oxford
Thed N. van Leeuwen
Thed N. van Leeuwen Leiden University
Vincent Larivière
Vincent Larivière University of Montreal
Trisha Greenhalgh
Trisha Greenhalgh University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring the Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to a range of flexible and rewarding online degree options. Students interested in making a positive impact in their communities can fast-track their education with accelerated masters in social work programs, which prepare graduates for leadership roles in social services in less time than traditional pathways.

For those fascinated by human behavior and mental health, an accredited 2 year psychology degree online offers a streamlined route to entry-level positions or advanced studies in psychology. Many counseling careers require specialized licensure; choosing one of the most cacrep schools ensures graduates meet national standards for professional counselors and have access to quality training.

Those inspired to support families and couples can pursue online marriage and family therapy graduate programs to build expertise in this growing field. Whether you're beginning your academic journey or advancing your credentials, these online programs offer affordable and flexible pathways to meaningful careers.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan Grant

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles