World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
43
Citations
10371
World Ranking
4327
National Ranking
726

Jonathan Grant publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan Grant sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 188 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Jonathan Grant D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan Grant sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jonathan Grant is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom. Their research contributions are primarily situated within the field of Medicine, encompassing 20 publications in this domain.

The scientist's work spans several subfields of study, including:

  • Genetics (9 publications)
  • Economics and Econometrics (8 publications)
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (8 publications)
  • General Health Professions (7 publications)
  • Surgery (6 publications)

Jonathan Grant's main research topics cover a diverse range of areas such as:

  • Scientometrics and bibliometrics research (12 publications)
  • Genomics and Rare Diseases (8 publications)
  • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (6 publications)
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 publications)
  • Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (4 publications)
  • Innovation Policy and R&D (4 publications)
  • Health Policy Implementation Science (4 publications)

They have published frequently in certain venues, including:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) with 5 publications
  • Health Research Policy and Systems with 3 publications
  • F1000Research with 3 publications
  • Journal of Diabetes with 3 publications
  • Genetics in Medicine with 2 publications

Key recent papers authored or co-authored by Jonathan Grant include:

  • From COVID-19 research to vaccine application: why might it take 17 months not 17 years and what are the wider lessons? (2020, Health Research Policy and Systems)
  • A simplified (modified) Duke Activity Status Index (M-DASI) to characterise functional capacity: a secondary analysis of the Measurement of Exercise Tolerance before Surgery (METS) study (2020, British Journal of Anaesthesia)
  • Using Policy Labs as a process to bring evidence closer to public policymaking: a guide to one approach (2020, Palgrave Communications)
  • The Inequities of Mental Health Research (IAMHRF) (2020, OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University))
  • Fundamental challenges in assessing the impact of research infrastructure (2021, Health Research Policy and Systems)

Jonathan Grant's collaboration network includes frequent co-authors such as Alice Garrett, Sophie Allen, Miranda Durkie, George J. Burghel, and Rachel Robinson, each of whom has co-authored 11 papers with them.

Best Publications

  • The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research:

    Zoë Slote Morris;Steven Wooding;Jonathan Grant

  • How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set

    Iain Chalmers;Michael B Bracken;Ben Djulbegovic;Silvio Garattini

  • How long does biomedical research take? Studying the time taken between biomedical and health research and its translation into products, policy, and practice

    Stephen R Hanney;Sophie Castle-Clarke;Jonathan Grant;Jonathan Grant;Susan Guthrie

  • Evaluating "payback" on biomedical research from papers cited in clinical guidelines: applied bibliometric study.

    Jonathan Grant;Robert Cottrell;Françoise Cluzeau;Gail Fawcett

  • Low Fertility and Population Ageing

    Jonathan Grant;Stijn Hoorens;Suja Sivadasan;Mirjam van het Loo

  • Low fertility and population ageing: causes consequences and policy options.

    Jonathan Grant;Stijn Hoorens;Suja Sivadasan;Mirjam van het Loo

  • Basic research and health: a reassessment of the scientific basis for the support of biomedical science

    Jonathan Grant;Liz Green;Barbara Mason

  • Proposed methods for reviewing the outcomes of health research: the impact of funding by the UK's 'Arthritis Research Campaign'

    Stephen R Hanney;Jonathan Grant;Steven Wooding;Martin J Buxton

  • The comparative role of consanguinity in infant and childhood mortality in Pakistan

    Jonathan Grant;AH Bittles

  • Does inbreeding lead to decreased human fertility

    AH Bittles;Jonathan Grant;Sian Sullivan;Rohanah Hussain

  • A global call for action to include gender in research impact assessment

    Pavel V. Ovseiko;Trisha Greenhalgh;Paula Adam;Jonathan Grant

  • Estimating the returns to United Kingdom publicly funded musculoskeletal disease research in terms of net value of improved health outcomes

    Matthew Glover;Erin Montague;Alexandra Pollitt;Susan Guthrie

  • ISRIA statement: ten-point guidelines for an effective process of research impact assessment

    Paula Adam;Pavel V. Ovseiko;Jonathan Grant;Kathryn E. A. Graham

  • Payback arising from research funding: evaluation of the Arthritis Research Campaign.

    Steven Wooding;Stephen Hanney;Martin Buxton;Jonathan Grant

  • Women and academic medicine: a review of the evidence on female representation:

    Maryse Penny;Rosanna Jeffries;Jonathan Grant;Sally C Davies

  • Do patients always prefer quicker treatment?: a discrete choice analysis of patients' stated preferences in the London Patient Choice Project

    Peter Burge;Nancy Devlin;John Appleby;Charlene Rohr

  • Estimating the returns to UK publicly funded cancer-related research in terms of the net value of improved health outcomes.

    Matthew Glover;Martin Buxton;Susan Guthrie;Stephen Hanney

  • Measuring research: A guide to research evaluation frameworks and tools

    Susan Guthrie;Watu Wamae;Stephanie Diepeveen;Steven Wooding

  • Quantifying the economic impact of government and charity funding of medical research on private research and development funding in the United Kingdom

    Jon Sussex;Yan Feng;Jorge Mestre-Ferrandiz;Michele Pistollato

  • Medical Research: What's It Worth? Estimating the Economic Benefits from Medical Research in the UK

    Martin Buxton;Stephen Hanney;Steve Morris;Leonie Sundmacher

  • The nature, scale and beneficiaries of research impact: An initial analysis of the Research Excellence Framework (REF) 2014 impact case studies

    Jonathan Grant;Saba Hinrichs

  • The nature, scale and beneficiaries of research impact

    Jonathan Grant;Saba Hinrichs;Alastair Gill;Jonathan Adams

Frequent Co-Authors

Alan H. Bittles
Alan H. Bittles Edith Cowan University
Keith M. Channon
Keith M. Channon University of Oxford
Alastair M. Buchan
Alastair M. Buchan University of Oxford
Graham Thornicroft
Graham Thornicroft King's College London
Graham M. Lord
Graham M. Lord University of Manchester
Nancy Devlin
Nancy Devlin University of Melbourne
Iain Chalmers
Iain Chalmers University of Oxford
Thed N. van Leeuwen
Thed N. van Leeuwen Leiden University
Vincent Larivière
Vincent Larivière University of Montreal
Trisha Greenhalgh
Trisha Greenhalgh University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring the Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to a range of flexible and rewarding online degree options. Students interested in making a positive impact in their communities can fast-track their education with accelerated masters in social work programs, which prepare graduates for leadership roles in social services in less time than traditional pathways.

For those fascinated by human behavior and mental health, an accredited 2 year psychology degree online offers a streamlined route to entry-level positions or advanced studies in psychology. Many counseling careers require specialized licensure; choosing one of the most cacrep schools ensures graduates meet national standards for professional counselors and have access to quality training.

Those inspired to support families and couples can pursue online marriage and family therapy graduate programs to build expertise in this growing field. Whether you're beginning your academic journey or advancing your credentials, these online programs offer affordable and flexible pathways to meaningful careers.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan Grant

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles