World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
57
Citations
13255
World Ranking
1769
National Ranking
133

Alan H. Bittles publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan H. Bittles sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 314 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Alan H. Bittles D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan H. Bittles sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2007 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Gene
  • Genetics
  • Mutation

His primary areas of study are Demography, Consanguinity, Consanguineous Marriage, Infant mortality and Inbreeding. His Demography research incorporates themes from Genetic counseling, Genetics, Intellectual disability, Urbanization and Pediatrics. His studies in Intellectual disability integrate themes in fields like Life expectancy, Cancer registry, Incidence and Down syndrome.

His Consanguinity research includes elements of Offspring, Pregnancy, Fertility, Public health and Developing country. His Consanguineous Marriage study incorporates themes from Endogamy, Legislation, Prejudice and Caste. His work in Infant mortality tackles topics such as Child mortality which are related to areas like Mortality rate, Logistic regression and Birth order.

His most cited work include:

  • Consanguinity and its relevance to clinical genetics (411 citations)
  • Consanguinity, human evolution, and complex diseases (336 citations)
  • The Influence of Intellectual Disability on Life Expectancy (325 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Alan H. Bittles mostly deals with Demography, Consanguinity, Consanguineous Marriage, Genetics and Inbreeding. His work deals with themes such as Fertility, Coefficient of relationship, Disease, Developing country and Ethnic group, which intersect with Demography. His Consanguinity research incorporates themes from Endogamy, Public health, Genetic counseling and Infant mortality.

His Public health research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Epidemiology and Human genetics. His Consanguineous Marriage research includes themes of Genealogy, Genetic drift and Cousin. His study in Genetics focuses on Allele in particular.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Demography (43.89%)
  • Consanguinity (36.67%)
  • Consanguineous Marriage (26.39%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2010-2020)?

  • Consanguinity (36.67%)
  • Consanguineous Marriage (26.39%)
  • Demography (43.89%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Consanguinity, Consanguineous Marriage, Demography, Disease and Public health are his primary areas of study. His work carried out in the field of Consanguinity brings together such families of science as Endogamy, Genealogy, Genetic counseling and Infant mortality. His study with Consanguineous Marriage involves better knowledge in Genetics.

His Demography study combines topics in areas such as Coefficient of relationship, First Cousin, Life expectancy, Down syndrome and Ethnic group. The Disease study combines topics in areas such as Clinical trial and Medical emergency. His Public health research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Epidemiology, Disease burden, Bioinformatics and Human genetics.

Between 2010 and 2020, his most popular works were:

  • Consanguineous marriages, pearls and perils: Geneva International Consanguinity Workshop Report (174 citations)
  • Consanguinity in Context (71 citations)
  • Consanguinity and the risk of congenital heart disease (52 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Gene
  • Genetics
  • Mutation

His primary areas of investigation include Consanguinity, Genetic counseling, Demography, Consanguineous Marriage and Pediatrics. In his study, Orphan drug is strongly linked to Disease, which falls under the umbrella field of Consanguinity. His studies in Genetic counseling integrate themes in fields like Latin Americans, Family medicine, Human genetics, Developing country and Health education.

His Demography study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Offspring, Pregnancy outcomes, First Cousin, Ethnic group and Index case. His Consanguineous Marriage research integrates issues from Global population, Fertility, Genetic testing and Infant mortality. Alan H. Bittles combines subjects such as Heart disease, European population, Genetic predisposition and Risk factor with his study of Pediatrics.

Best Publications

  • Consanguinity and its relevance to clinical genetics

    AH Bittles

  • Consanguinity, human evolution, and complex diseases

    Alan Bittles;Michael Black

  • The four ages of Down syndrome.

    Alan H Bittles;Carol Bower;Rafat Hussain;Emma J Glasson;Emma J Glasson;Emma J Glasson

  • The Influence of Intellectual Disability on Life Expectancy

    A.H. Bittles;B.A. Petterson;S.G. Sullivan;R. Hussain

  • The changing survival profile of people with Down's syndrome: implications for genetic counselling.

    Emma Glasson;S.G. Sullivan;R. Hussain;B.A. Petterson

  • Clinical, social, and ethical implications of changing life expectancy in Down syndrome

    A H Bittles;E J Glasson

  • Reproductive behavior and health in consanguineous marriages.

    Bittles Ah;Mason Wm;Greene J;Rao Na

  • The costs of human inbreeding and their implications for variations at the DNA level

    Alan H. Bittles;James V. Neel

  • Consanguineous marriages, pearls and perils: Geneva International Consanguinity Workshop Report

    Hanan Hamamy;Stylianos E. Antonarakis;Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza;Samia Temtamy

  • The Role and Significance of Consanguinity as a Demographic Variable

    Alan H. Bittles

  • The prevalence and demographic characteristics of consanguineous marriages in Pakistan

    R. Hussain;A. H. Bittles

  • Genetic Counseling and Screening of Consanguineous Couples and Their Offspring: Recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors

    Robin L. Bennett;Arno G. Motulsky;Alan Bittles;Louanne Hudgins

  • Endogamy, consanguinity and community genetics.

    A H Bittles

  • Gene mapping in Gypsies identifies a novel demyelinating neuropathy on chromosome 8q24.

    Luba Kalaydjieva;Luba Kalaydjieva;Joachim Hallmayer;David Chandler;Alexey Savov

  • Community control of genetic and congenital disorders

    A. Alwan;B. Modell;A.H. Bittles;A. Czeilel

  • A Community Genetics Perspective on Consanguineous Marriage

    A.H. Bittles

  • The impact of consanguinity on neonatal and infant health.

    Alan H Bittles;Alan H Bittles;Michael L Black

  • Consanguinity as a Determinant of Reproductive Behaviour and Mortality in Pakistan

    Alan H Bittles;Jonathan C Grant;Sajjad A Shami

  • Consanguinity in Context

    Alan H. Bittles

  • A climatologic investigation of the SARS-CoV outbreak in Beijing, China.

    Jingsong Yuan;Hongmin Yun;Wei Lan;Wei Wang

Frequent Co-Authors

Sheena G. Sullivan
Sheena G. Sullivan World Health Organization
Jonathan Grant
Jonathan Grant King's College London
Sue Fletcher
Sue Fletcher Murdoch University
Neil Small
Neil Small University of Bradford
Tony Roscioli
Tony Roscioli University of New South Wales
Ken McElreavey
Ken McElreavey Institut Pasteur
Bartha Maria Knoppers
Bartha Maria Knoppers McGill University Health Centre
Raoul C.M. Hennekam
Raoul C.M. Hennekam University of Amsterdam
Jon F. Merz
Jon F. Merz University of Pennsylvania
Anne De Paepe
Anne De Paepe Ghent University Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a future in social sciences or humanities, there are flexible pathways that make advanced degrees more accessible than ever. Many students opt for online degrees that offer both convenience and reputable credentials.

For those pursuing psychology, programs like the shortest online psyd programs can help you fast-track your journey to becoming a practicing psychologist. Similarly, the growing demand for marriage and family therapists makes accelerated mft programs online an attractive choice for those seeking specialized, accredited training at a faster pace.

Cost is another important consideration. If you’re exploring advanced education, you might wonder, how much is a masters in psychology? Affordable programs do exist, making it possible to gain vital skills while managing tuition expenses.

For educators interested in leadership and policy roles, accelerated edd programs allow for quick completion without sacrificing quality. Exploring these online options can put diverse and meaningful careers within your reach.

Best Scientists Citing Alan H. Bittles

Trending Scientists