World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
92
Citations
40014
World Ranking
11136
National Ranking
1056

John Wright publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Wright sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 529 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

John Wright D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Wright sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

John Wright is affiliated with the National Health Service in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focused on Medicine and Environmental Science, with an emphasis on subfields such as Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Genetics, and Molecular Biology.

Their work covers a range of research topics, including:

  • Birth, Development, and Health
  • Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Nutritional Studies and Diet

John Wright has contributed extensively to the scientific community with a series of notable publications. Among the recent papers are:

  • Cabozantinib in patients with advanced Ewing sarcoma or osteosarcoma (CABONE): a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial, 2020, The Lancet Oncology
  • Understanding COVID-19 misinformation and vaccine hesitancy in context: Findings from a qualitative study involving citizens in Bradford, UK, 2021, Health Expectations
  • Genome-wide association studies identify 137 genetic loci for DNA methylation biomarkers of aging, 2021, Genome Biology
  • Early-Life Environmental Exposures and Childhood Obesity: An Exposome-Wide Approach, 2020, Environmental Health Perspectives
  • Children develop robust and sustained cross-reactive spike-specific immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection, 2021, Nature Immunology

The frequent coauthors collaborating with John Wright include:

  • Rosemary McEachan
  • Martine Vrijheid
  • Regina Gražulevičienė
  • Léa Maître
  • Debbie A. Lawlor

John Wright's research has appeared in several key publication venues, such as:

  • Wellcome Open Research
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Environment International
  • ISEE Conference Abstracts
  • BMC Medicine

Best Publications

  • Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA): Achievements in 10 years and future needs

    J. Bousquet;H. J. Schünemann;B. Samolinski;P. Demoly

  • Continuous positive airways pressure for obstructive sleep apnoea in adults

    Tammie L Giles;Toby J Lasserson;Brian Smith;John White

  • Ambient air pollution and low birthweight: a European cohort study (ESCAPE)

    Marie Pedersen;Lise Giorgis-Allemand;Claire Bernard;Inmaculada Aguilera

  • Oral appliances for obstructive sleep apnoea

    Jerome Lim;Toby J Lasserson;John Fleetham;John J Wright

  • Cohort Profile: The Born in Bradford multi-ethnic family cohort study

    John Wright;Neil Small;Pauline Raynor;Derek Tuffnell

  • Impact of maternal body mass index and gestational weight gain on pregnancy complications: An individual participant data meta-analysis of European, North American and Australian cohorts

    Susana Santos;Ellis Voerman;Pilar Amiano;Henrique Barros

  • Development and importance of health needs assessment

    John Wright;Rhys Williams;John R Wilkinson

  • Health effects of obstructive sleep apnoea and the effectiveness of continuous positive airways pressure: a systematic review of the research evidence

    John Wright;Rachel Johns;Ian Watt;Arabella Melville

  • What's the evidence that NICE guidance has been implemented? Results from a national evaluation using time series analysis, audit of patients' notes, and interviews.

    Trevor A. Sheldon;Nicky Cullum;Diane Dawson;Annette Jean Lankshear

  • Comparison of the effectiveness of inhaler devices in asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease: a systematic review of the literature

    Brocklebank D;Ram F;Wright J;Barry P

  • Maternal body mass index, gestational weight gain and the risk of overweight and obesity across childhood: An individual participant data meta-analysis

    Ellis Voerman;Susana Santos;Bernadeta Patro Golab;Bernadeta Patro Golab;Pilar Amiano

  • Mechanical versus manual chest compression for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC): a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial

    Gavin D. Perkins;Gavin D. Perkins;Ranjit Lall;Tom Quinn;Charles D. Deakin;Charles D. Deakin

  • Information provision for stroke patients and their caregivers

    Anne Forster;Lesley Brown;Jane Smith;Allan House

  • The Human Early-Life Exposome (HELIX): Project Rationale and Design

    Martine Vrijheid;Rémy Slama;Oliver Robinson;Leda Chatzi

  • Canadian Incidence Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect: Final Report

    Nico Trocmé;Bruce MacLaurin;Barbara Fallon;Joanne Daciuk

  • Development of an evidence-based framework of factors contributing to patient safety incidents in hospital settings: a systematic review

    Rebecca Lawton;Rosemary R C McEachan;Sally J Giles;Reema Sirriyeh

  • The health impact of the 2014-15 Ebola outbreak.

    J.W.T. Elston;J.W.T. Elston;C. Cartwright;P. Ndumbi;J. Wright

  • A systematic review of the relationships between social capital and socioeconomic inequalities in health: a contribution to understanding the psychosocial pathway of health inequalities

    Eleonora P Uphoff;Kate E Pickett;Baltica Cabieses;Baltica Cabieses;Neil Small

  • PCSK9 genetic variants and risk of type 2 diabetes: a mendelian randomisation study

    Amand F Schmidt;Daniel I Swerdlow;Daniel I Swerdlow;Michael V Holmes;Michael V Holmes;Riyaz S Patel;Riyaz S Patel

  • Maternal body mass index, gestational weight gain, and the risk of overweight and obesity across childhood: An individual participant data meta-analysis

    Voerman E;antos S;Patro Golab B;Amiano P

Frequent Co-Authors

Debbie A. Lawlor
Debbie A. Lawlor University of Bristol
Rosemary R. C. McEachan
Rosemary R. C. McEachan National Health Service
Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen
Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen Barcelona Institute for Global Health
Neil Small
Neil Small University of Bradford
Kate E. Pickett
Kate E. Pickett University of York
Martine Vrijheid
Martine Vrijheid Pompeu Fabra University
Trevor A Sheldon
Trevor A Sheldon Queen Mary University of London
Xavier Basagaña
Xavier Basagaña Pompeu Fabra University
Jordi Sunyer
Jordi Sunyer Pompeu Fabra University
Jean Bousquet
Jean Bousquet University of Montpellier

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medical studies in the USA opens many career pathways beyond the traditional MD. For those interested in nursing, some options now offer an lpn program without teas test to help students start their journey with fewer testing barriers.

If healthcare management interests you, earning a health care administration degree online can lead to leadership roles in hospitals, clinics, and public health organizations. These flexible online degrees allow you to balance studies with work or family commitments.

Registered nurses aiming to advance can consider the asn to fnp pathway. This bridge program enables nurses with an associate’s degree to complete a master’s and become a Family Nurse Practitioner more efficiently.

Students passionate about nutrition and wellness might explore online nutrition degree programs, which lay the foundation for careers in health education, counseling, and dietetics.

Each of these options represents a distinct but highly valued career route in healthcare, offering both flexibility and diverse opportunities in the growing US medical field.

Best Scientists Citing John Wright

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles