World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Rosemary R. C. McEachan

Rosemary R. C. McEachan

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
58
Citations
11913
World Ranking
1665
National Ranking
306

Rosemary R. C. McEachan publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rosemary R. C. McEachan sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 185 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Rosemary R. C. McEachan D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rosemary R. C. McEachan sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rosemary R. C. McEachan is affiliated with the National Health Service in the United Kingdom and has published extensively in environmental science and medicine. Their research focuses primarily on topics intersecting health and the environment, with particular attention to public health, toxicology, and developmental health issues.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Medicine

Within these fields, they explore several subfields such as:

  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • General Health Professions
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
  • Speech and Hearing

Key research topics covered in their publications revolve around:

  • Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Birth, Development, and Health
  • Noise Effects and Management
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Urban Green Space and Health
  • Climate Change and Health Impacts

Rosemary R. C. McEachan has contributed to multiple papers, including:

  • Long COVID burden and risk factors in 10 UK longitudinal studies and electronic health records (2022) published in Nature Communications
  • Nature-based outdoor activities for mental and physical health: Systematic review and meta-analysis (2021) published in SSM - Population Health
  • Understanding COVID-19 misinformation and vaccine hesitancy in context: Findings from a qualitative study involving citizens in Bradford, UK (2021) published in Health Expectations
  • Early-Life Environmental Exposures and Childhood Obesity: An Exposome-Wide Approach (2020) published in Environmental Health Perspectives
  • The LifeCycle Project-EU Child Cohort Network: a federated analysis infrastructure and harmonized data of more than 250,000 children and parents (2020) published in European Journal of Epidemiology

The scientist frequently collaborates with several colleagues, noted for co-authoring numerous works, including:

  • John Wright
  • Martine Vrijheid
  • Regina Gražulevičienė
  • Léa Maître
  • Marina Vafeiadi

Rosemary's publications appear regularly in venues such as:

  • Wellcome Open Research
  • Environment International
  • Harvard Dataverse
  • ISEE Conference Abstracts
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Best Publications

  • Long COVID burden and risk factors in 10 UK longitudinal studies and electronic health records

    Unknown

  • Meta-Analysis of the Reasoned Action Approach (RAA) to Understanding Health Behaviors.

    Rosemary McEachan;Natalie Taylor;Natalie Taylor;Reema Harrison;Rebecca Lawton

  • Desire or reason: predicting health behaviors from affective and cognitive attitudes.

    Rebecca Lawton;Mark Conner;Rosemary McEachan

  • The Human Early-Life Exposome (HELIX): Project Rationale and Design

    Martine Vrijheid;Rémy Slama;Oliver Robinson;Leda Chatzi

  • Development of an evidence-based framework of factors contributing to patient safety incidents in hospital settings: a systematic review

    Rebecca Lawton;Rosemary R C McEachan;Sally J Giles;Reema Sirriyeh

  • Nature-based outdoor activities for mental and physical health: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Peter A. Coventry;JenniferV.E. Brown;Jodi Pervin;Sally Brabyn

  • The association between green space and depressive symptoms in pregnant women: moderating roles of socioeconomic status and physical activity

    R. R. C. McEachan;S. L. Prady;Graham Smith;L. Fairley

  • Understanding COVID-19 misinformation and vaccine hesitancy in context: Findings from a qualitative study involving citizens in Bradford, UK.

    Bridget Lockyer;Shahid Islam;Aamnah Rahman;Josie Dickerson

  • Not All Green Space Is Created Equal: Biodiversity Predicts Psychological Restorative Benefits From Urban Green Space.

    Emma Wood;Alice Harsant;Martin Dallimer;Anna Cronin de Chavez

  • Human Early Life Exposome (HELIX) study: A European population-based exposome cohort

    Léa Maitre;Jeroen de Bont;Maribel Casas;Oliver Robinson

  • Changing exercise through targeting affective or cognitive attitudes.

    Mark Conner;Ryan E. Rhodes;Ben Morris;Rosemary McEachan

  • DNA methylation in childhood asthma: an epigenome-wide meta-analysis

    Cheng-Jian Xu;Cilla Söderhäll;Mariona Bustamante;Nour Baïz

  • Inequality, green spaces, and pregnant women: roles of ethnicity and individual and neighbourhood socioeconomic status.

    Payam Dadvand;John Wright;David Martinez;Xavier Basagaña

  • Early-Life Environmental Exposures and Childhood Obesity: An Exposome-Wide Approach

    Martine Vrijheid;Serena Fossati;Léa Maitre;Sandra Márquez

  • Role of affective attitudes and anticipated affective reactions in predicting health behaviors.

    Mark Conner;Rosemary McEachan;Natalie Taylor;Jane O'Hara

  • Evidence, Theory and Context: Using intervention mapping to develop a worksite physical activity intervention

    Rosemary R C McEachan;Rebecca J Lawton;Cath Jackson;Mark Conner

  • Role of patient and public involvement in implementation research: a consensus study

    Kara A Gray-Burrows;Thomas A Willis;Robbie Foy;Martin Rathfelder

  • The LifeCycle Project-EU Child Cohort Network: a federated analysis infrastructure and harmonized data of more than 250,000 children and parents.

    Vincent W. V. Jaddoe;Janine F. Felix;Anne-Marie Nybo Andersen;Marie-Aline Charles;Marie-Aline Charles

  • Determinants of the urinary and serum metabolome in children from six European populations.

    Chung-Ho E. Lau;Alexandros P. Siskos;Léa Maitre;Oliver Robinson

  • Prenatal Exposure to Perfluoroalkyl Substances Associated With Increased Susceptibility to Liver Injury in Children

    Nikos Stratakis;Nikos Stratakis;David V. Conti;Ran Jin;Katerina Margetaki

  • Contrasting Distributions of Urban Green Infrastructure across Social and Ethno-racial Groups

    M. Ferguson;H.e. Roberts;R.r.c. Mceachan;M. Dallimer

  • Early-life exposome and lung function in children in Europe: an analysis of data from the longitudinal, population-based HELIX cohort.

    Lydiane Agier;Xavier Basagana;Lea Maitre;Berit Granum

  • Testing a workplace physical activity intervention: a cluster randomized controlled trial

    Rosemary R C McEachan;Rebecca J Lawton;Cath Jackson;Mark Conner

  • Randomized controlled trial of collaborative implementation intentions targeting working adults' physical activity.

    Andrew Prestwich;Mark T. Conner;Rebecca J. Lawton;Jane K. Ward

Frequent Co-Authors

John Wright
John Wright National Health Service
Rebecca Lawton
Rebecca Lawton University of Leeds
Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen
Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen Barcelona Institute for Global Health
Xavier Basagaña
Xavier Basagaña Pompeu Fabra University
Mark Conner
Mark Conner University of Leeds
Kate E. Pickett
Kate E. Pickett University of York
Martine Vrijheid
Martine Vrijheid Pompeu Fabra University
Line Småstuen Haug
Line Småstuen Haug Norwegian Institute of Public Health
Debbie A. Lawlor
Debbie A. Lawlor University of Bristol
Jordi Sunyer
Jordi Sunyer Pompeu Fabra University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities online opens up a variety of career options. If you’re interested in mental health or counseling, you might consider online psychology degrees. These flexible programs are designed for students seeking affordable entry points into psychology-related professions, including counseling and human services.

For those passionate about community service or therapy, online MSW programs (Master of Social Work) offer accessible pathways to become licensed social workers. These degrees can lead to roles in school systems, hospitals, or private practice.

If you aspire to advanced clinical practice with an accelerated academic path, accelerated PsyD programs provide intensive online training for aspiring psychologists. These programs are ideal for those wanting to deliver clinical services or engage in applied research more quickly.

Another in-demand option is becoming a licensed marriage and family therapist. LMFT programs (Marriage and Family Therapy) are available online and can be completed in shorter timeframes, leading to specialized counseling careers addressing family dynamics and relationships.

Best Scientists Citing Rosemary R. C. McEachan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles