World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
33
Citations
3681
World Ranking
10656
National Ranking
5574

Peter J. Urcuioli publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter J. Urcuioli sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 89 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Peter J. Urcuioli D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter J. Urcuioli sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter J. Urcuioli is affiliated with Purdue University West Lafayette in the United States.

There is no available data on recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, main fields of study, subfields, or main research topics associated with this scientist.

There are no records of awards received by Peter J. Urcuioli.

This profile is based solely on the available affiliation information without further details on the academic contributions or specific research interests.

Best Publications

  • The legacy of Guttman and Kalish (1956): Twenty-five years of research on stimulus generalization.

    Werner K. Honig;Peter J. Urcuioli

  • Evidence for common coding in many-to-one matching: Retention, intertrial interference, and transfer.

    Peter J. Urcuioli;Thomas R. Zentall;Pamela Jackson-Smith;Janice N. Steirn

  • Behavioral and associative effects of differential outcomes in discrimination learning

    Peter J. Urcuioli

  • Control of choice in conditional discriminations by sample-specific behaviors.

    Peter J. Urcuioli;Werner K. Honig

  • ASSOCIATIVE SYMMETRY, ANTISYMMETRY, AND A THEORY OF PIGEONS' EQUIVALENCE-CLASS FORMATION

    Peter J. Urcuioli

  • Control by sample location in pigeons' matching to sample.

    Karen M. Lionello;Peter J. Urcuioli

  • Retrospective coding in pigeons' delayed matching-to-sample.

    Peter J. Urcuioli;Thomas R. Zentall

  • Common coding in pigeons assessed through partial versus total reversals of many-to-one conditional and simple discriminations.

    Thomas R. Zentall;Janice N. Steirn;Lou M. Sherburne;Peter J. Urcuioli

  • Associative concept learning in animals

    Thomas R. Zentall;Edward A. Wasserman;Peter J. Urcuioli

  • Proactive interference in animal memory.

    Anthony A. Wright;Peter J. Urcuioli;Stephen F. Sands

  • Transfer of hue matching in pigeons.

    Peter J. Urcuioli;John A. Nevin

  • Some relationships between outcome expectancies and sample stimuli in pigeons' delayed matching

    Peter J. Urcuioli

  • Stimulus control topographies and tests of symmetry in pigeons.

    Karen M. Lionello-DeNolf;Peter J. Urcuioli

  • Interaction of sample dimension and sample-comparison mapping on pigeons' performance of delayed conditional discriminations

    Thomas R. Zentall;Peter J. Urcuioli;Joyce A. Jagielo;Pamela Jackson-Smith

  • Transfer to Derived Sample-comparison Relations by Pigeons Following Many-to-one versus One-to-many Matching with Identical Training Relations

    Peter J. Urcuioli;Thomas R. Zentall;Thomas DeMarse

  • 4 Acquired equivalences and mediated generalization in pigeon's matching-to-sample

    Peter J. Urcuioli

  • On the role of differential sample behaviors in matching-to-sample.

    Peter J. Urcuioli

  • Transfer effects of incompatible location-relevant mappings on a subsequent visual or auditory simon task.

    Kim-Phuong L. Vu;Robert W. Proctor;Peter Urcuioli

  • Emergent Relations in the Formation of Stimulus Classes by Pigeons

    Thomas R. Zentall;Peter J. Urcuioli

  • Memory codes in pigeon short-term memory: Effects of varying the number of sample and comparison stimuli☆

    Thomas R. Zentall;Joyce A. Jagielo;Pamela Jackson-Smith;Peter J. Urcuioli

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas R. Zentall
Thomas R. Zentall University of Kentucky
Robert W. Proctor
Robert W. Proctor Purdue University West Lafayette
Edward A. Wasserman
Edward A. Wasserman University of Iowa
Anthony A. Wright
Anthony A. Wright The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
John A. Nevin
John A. Nevin University of New Hampshire
Kim-Phuong L. Vu
Kim-Phuong L. Vu California State University, Long Beach
Raymond M. Klein
Raymond M. Klein Dalhousie University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology degrees in the USA opens doors to a range of online programs and fast-paced career pathways, especially for those interested in counseling fields. Many students seek streamlined options to enter the workforce efficiently without sacrificing quality education.

Online degrees not only offer flexibility but also align with state-specific requirements. Students looking for the Colorado fastest counseling programs can find accelerated course structures that help them qualify sooner. Similarly, if you are interested in the shortest path to becoming a counselor in Connecticut, there are targeted online options that cater to those timeframes.

States like Delaware also feature unique expedited tracks, with the Delaware fastest counseling programs providing practical pathways to licensure. For students based in Florida, following the quickest path to becoming a counselor in Florida could mean starting internships and building clinical experience even as you complete your coursework online.

With the demand for mental health professionals growing nationwide, these flexible, accredited programs are increasingly popular choices for aspiring counselors and psychologists.

Best Scientists Citing Peter J. Urcuioli

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles