World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 42 7609 7098 4089 3715 98 6636
Neuroscience 42 7672 7078 3294 2976 98 6636

Joseph E. Dunsmoor publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Joseph E. Dunsmoor between 2007 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Joseph E. Dunsmoor published across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025, averaging 7.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2024. 37 of the 140 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2024. 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 3 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 23 publications 2025: 14 publications
2007 2025

140 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Joseph E. Dunsmoor: publications per year, 2007 to 2025
Year Publications
2007 1
2008 1
2009 3
2010 2
2011 5
2012 2
2013 2
2014 3
2015 9
2016 2
2017 8
2018 3
2019 11
2020 12
2021 13
2022 15
2023 11
2024 23
2025 14
Total 140
Download as CSV

Joseph E. Dunsmoor publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph E. Dunsmoor sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 98 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 98
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Joseph E. Dunsmoor D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph E. Dunsmoor sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 42
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Joseph E. Dunsmoor is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Neuroscience and Psychology, with significant work in subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Behavioral Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.

The scientist's research addresses several main topics including Memory and Neural Mechanisms, Stress Responses and Cortisol, Memory Processes and Influences, Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research, Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes, as well as Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research.

Joseph E. Dunsmoor has published articles in several frequent venues, notably Neuropsychopharmacology, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Biological Psychiatry, and Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

Among recent papers authored or coauthored by this scientist are:

  • "Laboratory models of post-traumatic stress disorder: The elusive bridge to translation" (2022), Neuron
  • "Tag and capture: how salient experiences target and rescue nearby events in memory" (2022), Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • "Memory consolidation as an adaptive process" (2021), Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • "A meta-analysis of conditioned fear generalization in anxiety-related disorders" (2022), Neuropsychopharmacology
  • "Going Viral: How Fear, Socio-Cognitive Polarization and Problem-Solving Influence Fake News Detection and Proliferation During COVID-19 Pandemic" (2021), Frontiers in Communication

The scientist often collaborates with other researchers. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Samuel E. Cooper
  • Josh M. Cisler
  • Augustin C. Hennings
  • Jarrod A. Lewis-Peacock
  • Mason McClay

Best Publications

  • Fear Generalization in Humans: Systematic Review and Implications for Anxiety Disorder Research

    Simon Dymond;Joseph E. Dunsmoor;Bram Vervliet;Bryan Roche

  • Fear Generalization and Anxiety: Behavioral and Neural Mechanisms

    Joseph E. Dunsmoor;Rony Paz

  • Emotional learning selectively and retroactively strengthens memories for related events

    Joseph E. Dunsmoor;Vishnu P. Murty;Lila Davachi;Elizabeth A. Phelps

  • Rethinking Extinction

    Unknown

  • Generalization of conditioned fear along a dimension of increasing fear intensity

    Joseph E. Dunsmoor;Stephen R. Mitroff;Kevin S. LaBar

  • Neurobehavioral mechanisms of human fear generalization.

    Joseph E. Dunsmoor;Steven E. Prince;Vishnu P. Murty;Philip A. Kragel

  • Fear learning circuitry is biased toward generalization of fear associations in posttraumatic stress disorder

    RA Morey;JE Dunsmoor;CC Haswell;VM Brown

  • Categories, concepts, and conditioning: how humans generalize fear.

    Joseph E. Dunsmoor;Gregory L. Murphy

  • Role of conceptual knowledge in learning and retention of conditioned fear.

    Joseph E. Dunsmoor;Alex Martin;Kevin S. LaBar

  • Novelty-facilitated extinction: providing a novel outcome in place of an expected threat diminishes recovery of defensive responses.

    Joseph E. Dunsmoor;Vinn D. Campese;Ahmet O. Ceceli;Joseph E. LeDoux

  • Reward retroactively enhances memory consolidation for related items

    Anuya Patil;Vishnu P. Murty;Joseph E. Dunsmoor;Elizabeth A. Phelps;Elizabeth A. Phelps;Elizabeth A. Phelps

  • Impact of continuous versus intermittent CS-UCS pairing on human brain activation during Pavlovian fear conditioning.

    Joseph E. Dunsmoor;Peter A. Bandettini;David C. Knight

  • Neural correlates of unconditioned response diminution during Pavlovian conditioning.

    Joseph E. Dunsmoor;Peter A. Bandettini;David C. Knight

  • A meta-analysis of conditioned fear generalization in anxiety-related disorders

    Unknown

  • Aversive Learning Modulates Cortical Representations of Object Categories

    Joseph E. Dunsmoor;Philip A. Kragel;Alex Martin;Kevin S. LaBar

  • Memory consolidation as an adaptive process

    Emily T Cowan;Anna C Schapiro;Joseph E Dunsmoor;Vishnu P Murty

  • Stimulus generalization as a mechanism for learning to trust

    Oriel FeldmanHall;Joseph E. Dunsmoor;Alexa Tompary;Lindsay E. Hunter

  • Stimulus Typicality Determines How Broadly Fear Is Generalized

    Joseph E. Dunsmoor;Gregory L. Murphy

  • Conceptual similarity promotes generalization of higher order fear learning

    Joseph E. Dunsmoor;Allison J. White;Kevin S. LaBar

  • Laboratory models of post-traumatic stress disorder: The elusive bridge to translation

    Unknown

  • Extinction in multiple virtual reality contexts diminishes fear reinstatement in humans

    Joseph E. Dunsmoor;Fredrik Ahs;David J. Zielinski;Kevin S. LaBar

  • Effects of discrimination training on fear generalization gradients and perceptual classification in humans.

    Joseph E. Dunsmoor;Kevin S. LaBar

  • Behavioral and neural processes in counterconditioning: Past and future directions

    Nicole E. Keller;Augustin C. Hennings;Joseph E. Dunsmoor

Frequent Co-Authors

Elizabeth A. Phelps
Elizabeth A. Phelps Harvard University
Kevin S. LaBar
Kevin S. LaBar Duke University
Lila Davachi
Lila Davachi Columbia University
Stephen R. Mitroff
Stephen R. Mitroff George Washington University
Gregory L. Murphy
Gregory L. Murphy New York University
Rajendra A. Morey
Rajendra A. Morey Duke University
Bram Vervliet
Bram Vervliet KU Leuven
Miquel A. Fullana
Miquel A. Fullana Clínic Barcelona
Carles Soriano-Mas
Carles Soriano-Mas University of Barcelona
Alex Martin
Alex Martin National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering a neuroscience career, exploring related online degree options can open up flexible pathways. Many universities now offer accelerated programs that let you complete your studies faster, saving both time and money. These are ideal for students eager to enter the workforce or continue to graduate school sooner.

A neuroscience background can lead to some of the best degrees in the world in terms of salary and job security. Related fields such as biomedical engineering, computer science, and pharmacology are consistently among the college majors that make the most money, offering lucrative career prospects in both academia and industry.

For those looking for affordable education options, many cheap online colleges that accept fafsa make it possible to earn your degree without significant financial burden. No matter your goals or budget, there are online pathways in neuroscience and related disciplines to match your aspirations and career ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing Joseph E. Dunsmoor

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles