World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Tina B. Lonsdorf

Tina B. Lonsdorf

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
37
Citations
5381
World Ranking
9225
National Ranking
436

Tina B. Lonsdorf publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tina B. Lonsdorf sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 147 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Tina B. Lonsdorf D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tina B. Lonsdorf sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Don't fear 'fear conditioning': Methodological considerations for the design and analysis of studies on human fear acquisition, extinction, and return of fear

    Tina B. Lonsdorf;Mareike M. Menz;Marta Andreatta;Miguel A. Fullana

  • Genetic Gating of Human Fear Learning and Extinction Possible Implications for Gene-Environment Interaction in Anxiety Disorder

    Tina B. Lonsdorf;Tina B. Lonsdorf;Almut I. Weike;Pernilla Nikamo;Martin Schalling

  • More than just noise: Inter-individual differences in fear acquisition, extinction and return of fear in humans - Biological, experiential, temperamental factors, and methodological pitfalls.

    Tina B. Lonsdorf;Christian J. Merz

  • Distinct Contributions of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal and Orbitofrontal Cortex during Emotion Regulation

    Armita Golkar;Tina B. Lonsdorf;Andreas Olsson;Kara M. Lindstrom

  • Single dose of l-dopa makes extinction memories context-independent and prevents the return of fear

    Jan Haaker;Stefano Gaburro;Anupam Sah;Nina Gartmann

  • A review on human reinstatement studies: an overview and methodological challenges

    Jan Haaker;Armita Golkar;Dirk Hermans;Tina B. Lonsdorf

  • Navigating the garden of forking paths for data exclusions in fear conditioning research

    Tina B Lonsdorf;Maren Klingelhöfer-Jens;Marta Andreatta;Marta Andreatta;Tom Beckers

  • Increased Sensitivity to Thermal Pain Following a Single Opiate Dose Is Influenced by the COMT val158met Polymorphism

    Karin B. Jensen;Tina B. Lonsdorf;Martin Schalling;Eva Kosek

  • An elevated plus-maze in mixed reality for studying human anxiety-related behavior.

    Sarah V. Biedermann;Daniel G. Biedermann;Frederike Wenzlaff;Tim Kurjak

  • Imaging gene-substance interactions: the effect of the DRD2 TaqIA polymorphism and the dopamine agonist bromocriptine on the brain activation during the anticipation of reward.

    Peter Kirsch;Martin Reuter;Daniela Mier;Tina Lonsdorf

  • The COMTval158met polymorphism is associated with symptom relief during exposure-based cognitive-behavioral treatment in panic disorder

    Tina B Lonsdorf;Christian Rück;Jan Bergström;Gerhard Andersson;Gerhard Andersson

  • Long-term expression of human contextual fear and extinction memories involves amygdala, hippocampus and ventromedial prefrontal cortex: a reinstatement study in two independent samples

    Tina B. Lonsdorf;Jan Haaker;Raffael Kalisch

  • Perception of Thermal Pain and the Thermal Grill Illusion Is Associated with Polymorphisms in the Serotonin Transporter Gene

    Fredrik Lindstedt;Tina B. Lonsdorf;Martin Schalling;Eva Kosek

  • Sex differences in conditioned stimulus discrimination during context-dependent fear learning and its retrieval in humans: the role of biological sex, contraceptives and menstrual cycle phases.

    Tina B. Lonsdorf;Jan Haaker;Dirk Schümann;Tobias Sommer

  • Deficient inhibitory processing in trait anxiety: Evidence from context-dependent fear learning, extinction recall and renewal.

    J. Haaker;T.B. Lonsdorf;D. Schümann;M. Menz

  • 5-HTTLPR and COMTval158met genotype gate amygdala reactivity and habituation.

    Tina B. Lonsdorf;Armita Golkar;Kara M. Lindstöm;Peter Fransson

  • Fear Extinction Retention: Is It What We Think It Is?

    Tina B. Lonsdorf;Christian J. Merz;Miquel A. Fullana

  • A review on experimental and clinical genetic associations studies on fear conditioning, extinction and cognitive-behavioral treatment

    T B Lonsdorf;R Kalisch

  • Amygdala-dependent fear conditioning in humans is modulated by the BDNFval66met polymorphism.

    Tina B. Lonsdorf;Almut I. Weike;Armita Golkar;Martin Schalling

  • Making translation work: Harmonizing cross-species methodology in the behavioural neuroscience of Pavlovian fear conditioning

    Jan Haaker;Stephen Maren;Marta Andreatta;Marta Andreatta;Christian J. Merz

Frequent Co-Authors

Raffael Kalisch
Raffael Kalisch Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Martin Schalling
Martin Schalling Karolinska Institute
Arne Öhman
Arne Öhman Karolinska Institute
Andreas Reif
Andreas Reif Goethe University Frankfurt
Paul Pauli
Paul Pauli University of Würzburg
Katharina Domschke
Katharina Domschke University of Freiburg
Peter Zwanzger
Peter Zwanzger Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Alfons O. Hamm
Alfons O. Hamm University of Greifswald
Jürgen Deckert
Jürgen Deckert University of Würzburg
Christian J. Merz
Christian J. Merz Ruhr University Bochum

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Tina B. Lonsdorf