World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Francisco Lucena

Francisco Lucena

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 51 4363 4014 136 133 139 7947

Francisco Lucena publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Francisco Lucena between 1979 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Francisco Lucena published across 47 years, from 1979 to 2025, averaging 4.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2004. 4 of the 213 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1979 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2004. 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 2 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 2 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 5 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 5 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 4 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 10 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 0 publications 2025: 4 publications
1979 2025

213 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Francisco Lucena: publications per year, 1979 to 2025
Year Publications
1979 1
1980 0
1981 1
1982 2
1983 2
1984 1
1985 2
1986 3
1987 1
1988 5
1989 5
1990 1
1991 5
1992 1
1993 1
1994 4
1995 7
1996 1
1997 10
1998 3
1999 4
2000 6
2001 3
2002 7
2003 9
2004 12
2005 5
2006 5
2007 6
2008 10
2009 4
2010 4
2011 2
2012 11
2013 5
2014 7
2015 5
2016 6
2017 7
2018 7
2019 6
2020 11
2021 7
2022 3
2023 1
2024 0
2025 4
Total 213
Download as CSV

Francisco Lucena publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Francisco Lucena sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 135–144 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 139 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288 139
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

Francisco Lucena D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Francisco Lucena sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111 51
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139
61 123
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Overview

Francisco Lucena is affiliated with the University of Barcelona in Spain and conducts research primarily within the field of Environmental Science. Their investigations focus on various subfields, including Water Science and Technology, Ecology, Pollution, Molecular Biology, and Environmental Engineering.

Their work addresses several main topics, notably fecal contamination and water quality, gut microbiota and health, microbial community ecology and physiology, water treatment and disinfection, child nutrition and water access, groundwater flow and contamination studies, and microplastics and plastic pollution.

Lucena has published extensively in scientific journals, contributing to multiple papers including:

  • Combining multi-isotopic and molecular source tracking methods to identify nitrate pollution sources in surface and groundwater (2020) in Water Research
  • Impact of treated sewage effluent on the bacterial community composition in an intermittent mediterranean stream (2020) in Environmental Pollution
  • Detection of faecal bacteria and antibiotic resistance genes in biofilms attached to plastics from human-impacted coastal areas (2022) in Environmental Pollution
  • Review: Indicator bacteriophages in sludge, biosolids, sediments and soils (2020) in Environmental Research
  • Unravelling the composition of tap and mineral water microbiota: Divergences between next-generation sequencing techniques and culture-based methods (2020) in International Journal of Food Microbiology

Their frequent publication venues include Water Research, Dental Materials, Environmental Pollution, Journal of Environmental Management, and Environmental Research.

Lucena has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including Anicet R. Blanch, Cristina García-Aljaro, Elisenda Ballesté, Míriam Pascual-Benito, and Javier Méndez. These collaborations reflect a sustained engagement with fellow scientists working on related topics.

Best Publications

  • Viral Pollution in the Environment and in Shellfish: Human Adenovirus Detection by PCR as an Index of Human Viruses

    Sonia Pina;Montserrat Puig;Francisco Lucena;Joan Jofre

  • Detection of adenoviruses and enteroviruses in polluted waters by nested PCR amplification.

    M Puig;J Jofre;F Lucena;A Allard

  • Survival of bacterial indicator species and bacteriophages after thermal treatment of sludge and sewage

    Laura Mocé-Llivina;Maite Muniesa;Hugo Pimenta-Vale;Francisco Lucena

  • EU policy on sewage sludge utilization and perspectives on new approaches of sludge management.

    G. Mininni;A. R. Blanch;F. Lucena;S. Berselli

  • Integrated analysis of established and novel microbial and chemical methods for microbial source tracking.

    Anicet R. Blanch;Lluís Belanche-Muñoz;Xavier Bonjoch;James Ebdon

  • Sludge As a Potential Important Source of Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Both the Bacterial and Bacteriophage Fractions

    William Calero-Cáceres;Ana Melgarejo;Marta Colomer-Lluch;Claudia Stoll

  • Human origin of Bacteroides fragilis bacteriophages present in the environment.

    C Tartera;F Lucena;J Jofre

  • Reduction of bacterial indicators and bacteriophages infecting faecal bacteria in primary and secondary wastewater treatments.

    F. Lucena;A.E. Duran;A. Morón;E. Calderón

  • Removal and inactivation of indicator bacteriophages in fresh waters.

    A.E. Durán;M. Muniesa;X. Méndez;F. Valero

  • Evaluation of potential indicators of viral contamination in shellfish and their applicability to diverse geographical areas

    M Formiga-Cruz;Annika K Allard;A-C Conden-Hansson;K Henshilwood

  • Microbial indicators and pathogens: removal, relationships and predictive capabilities in water reclamation facilities.

    Ana Costán-Longares;Michel Montemayor;Andrey Payán;Javier Méndez

  • Combining multi-isotopic and molecular source tracking methods to identify nitrate pollution sources in surface and groundwater

    Raúl Carrey;Elisenda Ballesté;Anicet R. Blanch;Francisco Lucena

  • Occurrence and levels of indicator bacteriophages in bathing waters throughout Europe.

    N Contreras-Coll;F Lucena;K Mooijman;A Havelaar

  • Solar Advanced Oxidation Processes as disinfection tertiary treatments for real wastewater: Implications for water reclamation

    M. Agulló-Barceló;M.I. Polo-López;F. Lucena;J. Jofre

  • Enteroviruses and bacteriophages in bathing waters.

    Laura Mocé-Llivina;Francisco Lucena;Juan Jofre

  • Method for Isolation of Bacteroides Bacteriophage Host Strains Suitable for Tracking Sources of Fecal Pollution in Water

    Andrey Payan;James Ebdon;Huw Taylor;Christophe Gantzer

  • Evaluation of Bacteroides fragilis Bacteriophages as Indicators of the Virological Quality of Water

    J. Jofre;A. Bosch;F. Lucena;R. Gironés

  • Occurrence and levels of indicators and selected pathogens in different sludges and biosolids

    C. Guzmán;J. Jofre;M. Montemayor;F. Lucena

  • Comparative analysis of viral pathogens and potential indicators in shellfish.

    I. Muniain-Mujika;M. Calvo;F. Lucena;R. Girones

  • Comparative Survival of Free Shiga Toxin 2-Encoding Phages and Escherichia coli Strains outside the Gut

    Maite Muniesa;Francisco Lucena;Juan Jofre

  • Standardised evaluation of the performance of a simple membrane filtration-elution method to concentrate bacteriophages from drinking water.

    Javier Méndez;Ana Audicana;Ana Isern;Julián Llaneza

Frequent Co-Authors

Juan Jofre
Juan Jofre University of Barcelona
Anicet R. Blanch
Anicet R. Blanch University of Barcelona
Maite Muniesa
Maite Muniesa University of Barcelona
Albert Bosch
Albert Bosch University of Barcelona
Rosina Girones
Rosina Girones University of Barcelona
Sergi Astals
Sergi Astals University of Barcelona
Göran Wadell
Göran Wadell Umeå University
Damià Barceló
Damià Barceló University of Almería
Miren López de Alda
Miren López de Alda Spanish National Research Council
Joan Mata-Álvarez
Joan Mata-Álvarez University of Barcelona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students studying Microbiology in the USA, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways, especially in healthcare and data management. One growing field is health information management, where professionals oversee patient data and support medical systems. Pursuing a accredited online health information management degree cahiim ensures quality education from programs recognized for their rigorous standards.

In parallel, career options like becoming a certified professional coder offer strong job prospects. Those interested can discover details about cpc salary and career paths to guide their decisions. For faster certification, many benefit from pursuing an accredited fast medical billing and coding certificate online, which helps quickly enter the workforce in medical administration roles.

Additionally, those with a foundational degree might consider advanced roles such as health information managers. Learning about the bachelor of science in health information management salary provides insight into the earning potential and responsibilities of these positions, bridging healthcare expertise with data management skills.

Best Scientists Citing Francisco Lucena

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles